White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
:woot:
So will he actually count for the 2014 class? If he goes on a 2 year mission won't he be a 2016 recruit?
yes can we get some clarity here?
I also seem to recall reading at some point that this guy was into Aerospace Engineering stuff, IIRC. Logan Utah is a big Space community as they have the Utah State Space Dynamics Lab Corp there.
Space Dyanmics Lab does a lot of cool mission work much like Colorado's spinout does. Colorado is the CLEAR leader though in Space Mission work so if this kid grew up in that environment and is really into a career in Space/Science, he may be coming to Colorado regardless, as it's the #1 curriculum for him.
I also seem to recall reading at some point that this guy was into Aerospace Engineering stuff, IIRC. Logan Utah is a big Space community as they have the Utah State Space Dynamics Lab Corp there.
Space Dyanmics Lab does a lot of cool mission work much like Colorado's spinout does. Colorado is the CLEAR leader though in Space Mission work so if this kid grew up in that environment and is really into a career in Space/Science, he may be coming to Colorado regardless, as it's the #1 curriculum for him.
yes can we get some clarity here?
I also seem to recall reading at some point that this guy was into Aerospace Engineering stuff, IIRC. Logan Utah is a big Space community as they have the Utah State Space Dynamics Lab Corp there.
Space Dyanmics Lab does a lot of cool mission work much like Colorado's spinout does. Colorado is the CLEAR leader though in Space Mission work so if this kid grew up in that environment and is really into a career in Space/Science, he may be coming to Colorado regardless, as it's the #1 curriculum for him.
So how does that work exactly? He is on campus next year and likely RS. Than does his scholarship become available while he is on his mission? Than he comes back and he is back on scholarship.
Not sure that is a huge problem though. If he came back not ready to play I assume HCMM could rescind the scholarship. Besides not sure how binding a commitment is if he won't join the team until 2016 anyway.Looks like now he may go straight to the mission. Either way his scholly only counts against our 85 while he is on campus and recieving financial benefits. The two years he spends on his mission that slot is available to use for another player.
My concern is what happens on his mission. Some guys get sent to a place where they have an opportunity to continue working out and eating well putting on the lbs. I work with a guy who is LDS and went to BYU, had football players in his dorm. Talked about the guy who got a mission in Orem Utah and gained 45lbs. Also talked about the guy who did a mission to Africa or someplace like that and came back 20lbs lighter. Don't have a clue how they decide who goes where.
That specifically says one year, but missions are two years, yes? Armed service commitments are longer still. That rule needs some lawyering.
Did a little research. It looks like the NLI is binding upon recruits who sign their Letter and then go on a mission before enrolling -- as long as the school still has the scholarship available when they get back.
How is the NLI declared null and void?
One-Year Absence.
- Signee does not enroll (two-year or four-year institution) for at least one academic year and
the scholarship (in its same amount) is no longer available. Also applies to a signee who serves in
the U.S. Armed Forces or Church Mission for one year. NLI remains binding if the scholarship (in
its same amount) is available.
Quick Reference Guide to the NLI 2013-14
Also, Bennion will count toward the 25 signee limit for the 2014 class (no issues for CU there), but won't count toward the 85 scholarship roster limit until 2016.
The title is "One-Year Absence." The text of the rule says "at least one year," so it seems the letter of intent is binding for an indeterminate amount of time more than one year.
The LDS eligibility age requirement has been 19 for quite some time; it was the same when I lived in yootah in the mid-80's. Of course, this is a minimum age requirement.
Your point about the home structure and family-oriented values is true. They are usually some very well grounded young individuals.
Changed this year to 18 from 19. Mission is still 2 years.
I keep getting error messages when I try to amend my original post, so just replied to you.
That's what she saidInteresting. I guess they we're losing too many potential missionaries during that one year after hs.
Interesting. I guess they we're losing too many potential missionaries during that one year after hs.