L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
Clown Rape?
I would certainly hope so.
Clown Rape?
Here's a clue ... when Chen is inserted in the lineup ... it's not as a SHOOTING GUARD. He's a ball handler. And while he makes mistakes (as did Nate Tomlinson last year) ... he is still effective. He had a bad first half this game ... but overall I trust him with the ball more that Ski, who takes ill-advised shots, tries to penetrate the inside and gets stripped (happened at least twice in the 1st half today) ... and commits other turnovers by trying to force the pass (maybe Chen has been watching him to much and decided by imitating him he might get more PT ... seems to work for Ski).
By your own "stats" ... Chen has fewer average TOs and a higher shooting percentage. But in any case ... please tell me how you think that Ski has performed as a shooting guard for a major Div I program with a fg % of 36%? *
* by way of comparison ... AZ doesn't have a starter with less than a 42% fg percentage ... and that's Mark Lyons, who gets incessant criticism from their fans.
Add leaving their best shooter wide open for 3 to the list.
What does he do that Chen can't?
Pointing up agreeing with letsgoavs192 point about Chen^^^
this!!!!
So you kind of made it between Chen and Booker by the action I bolded above. Is Ski is a sophomore slump? Absolutely but look at the stats below....It's not a question of Booker v. Chen (although I submit that this argument started weeks ago when Mtn stated that very point, and at that point in the season I would have liked to have Chen get more PT with Booker on the bench) ... it's a question of Booker getting so much PT despite sub-par performance over everyone else who could contribute, e.g., Chen, Talton, Stalzer, hell ... the ****ing ball boy. In sum ... he has not performed up to the standard of a shooting guard for a major Div I program (which I trust you consider us to be at this point).
Pointing up agreeing with letsgoavs192 point about Chen
So you kind of made it between Chen and Booker by the action I bolded above. Is Ski is a sophomore slump? Absolutely but look at the stats below....
Win Shares:
1. Dinwiddie - 4.61
2. Roberson - 4.11
3. Scott - 2.7
4. Johnson - 2.11
5. Askia Booker - 1.27
6. Chen - 0.96
7. Staltzer - 0.53
8. Talton - 0.49
9. Adams - 0.19
Or we have "Adjusted +/-" for value per 40 minutes:
Booker: 0.62
Chen: -0.85
So out of Staltzer, Talton, and Chen (which you listed), Booker still adds more win value to the team.
http://www.allbuffs.com/showthread....in-Shares-and-Adjusted-for-the-last-5-seasons
Damn, thanks jg. I assume the adjusted +/- hasn't been adjusted yet?I updated the win shares, just now.
of note - booker's offensive win shares just went into the negative.
We really need him to shoot >40%
Damn, thanks jg. I assume the adjusted +/- hasn't been adjusted yet?
Kind of amazing that we're going to the tourny after looking at that, wow.adjusted +/- has now been updated.
we only have 4 guys with positive adjusted +/-. that is unbelievably terrible.
Kind of amazing that we're going to the tourny after looking at that, wow.
I don't think it would hurt Ski to be aggressive and drive early on in games. Maybe he could get a layup or two, get to to the line even. Always helps to see the ball go thru the net early.
The whole debate was fun for awhile, but honestly Ski needs to start hitting more shots. That is really all that matters now. He showed some flashes today, but it needs to be more than that because he is missing too many shots for us to be effective.
Very valid points, agree 100%Even though the updated #'s went somewhat against your argument, I'll say that I actually agree with you. Even though Booker's offensive #'s are terrible anyway you look at it, they aren't entirely his fault. He does take bad shots early in the shot clock, but he also shoots a decent amount as the shot clock is winding down. They aren't necessarily great shots, but you have to get one off, it's a product of our sh***y offense. Chen isn't taking those shots, he's deferring to either Ski or Dinwiddie. So Ski's numbers are skewed. I don't have anything empirically to back this up, but I would say around 1/4 of his shots are in the last 5 seconds of the shot clock.
Or don't shoot as much, and just take care of the ball and play good D
His shot selection is bad I agree but something has to get him going. He seemed to be not thinking so much last year. I haven't seen as many games this year but they said something on the radio today that made me think. He was missing a few shots and he was working on his stroke against air. He's always gonna be streaky but maybe he's thinking it too hard. Y'all have seen him more than me.
Unbelievable that the idea of Ski not shooting or even playing lives on in some minds as a winning solution. Simply not how it works. I'm not sure what else to say. We are what we are this year. Ski is a part of that. It would be absolute disaster without Ski.
I did have a question. Why are we getting so late into the clock? I heard it on the radio but damn it seemed like we had a ton of possessions that were under 10 on the clock, some lower.
Hate to say it, but sometimes we don't run an offense and do a bunch of one on one garbage that goes nowhere. Add Arizona's smothering D in, and I think that's the answer.
Goose calls it the "3 man weave 35 ft from the hoop" that's the best description that I've heard.
my dad called me during the game today, he watches a lot of bball but only the occasional CU game, his quote today "so if there there going to try to play 1 on 1, why don't they isolate the guy on one side so he has some room to work?" me "i know dad, i know"
Goose calls it the "3 man weave 35 ft from the hoop" that's the best description that I've heard.
my dad called me during the game today, he watches a lot of bball but only the occasional CU game, his quote today "so if there there going to try to play 1 on 1, why don't they isolate the guy on one side so he has some room to work?" me "i know dad, i know"
I started listening around when Jelly got his 2nd, that probably didn't help the O any. We need that dude in the tourney. I'm not of Ski shouldn't shoot camp and I know he doesn't have any choice. Hell, I don't want him to deferr. I probably shouldn't have said aggressive with Ski, Id just like to see him get some easy buckets early. It usually helps guys that can score.Hate to say it, but sometimes we don't run an offense and do a bunch of one on one garbage that goes nowhere. Add Arizona's smothering D in, and I think that's the answer.
Thats deep. But its not question ski is a better basketball player than Chen. Chen is a hustle guy. Reminds me of Eduardo Najera of the nuggets years ago. Ski is a great player who is having a long slum. He is thinking too much. Completely different levels, but in high school baseball my senior year I was hitting like 250 through the first 8 games worst slump of my life.I tried everything to get out of it. Hitting for hours. Videotaping. Everything. I got hurt and missed four games and got my mind off baseball and everything for a while and came back and busted out of the slump. Ski just needs to put the basketball away for a couple days.L Buff can you stop arguing that Chen is a better basketball player than Chen. When opposing fans read stuff like that on our site, it makes them think we are idots who don't know anything about basketball.