I'm all too used to the Zags not living up to expectations in March.
Not sure the Zags have many expectations this year.
They did win a decent conference though.
I'm all too used to the Zags not living up to expectations in March.
I like the fact the Ivy League gives it's (usual) one-bid to the best regular season team and if it comes down to it they have a one-game tiebreaker.
I don't like how these conferences very much discount the regular season so they can get some exposure they wouldn't get otherwise. Believe me, I get why they do it. I just don't like how it's treated like a high school playoff tournament and every team makes it regardless of record and they're only playing for seeding.
I like it in the old Big East how they eliminated the worst teams. I like how this conference and others gives the higher seed homecourt advantage.
And to your last point your absolutely right. We benefited from that kind of thing even though the Pac-12 got another bid that year. The difference is the Pac-12 was very down that year, even if let's say Wazzu won this year, the Pac-12 would still get a lot of representation. I don't think a one-bid league should be awarding it this way.
When Towson went like 2-24 some years ago in the regular season, the joke was they were 10 games away from winning the national championship, not exactly realistic but stupid nonetheless.Completely agree, the regular season champ is certainly the more deserving team. It's unfair that a lousy team can get hot for 3 or 4 games and win their conference tourney and get a shot to play for the national championship while a more deserving conference champ or a bubble team gets left out. But as you implied they do it because these conference tournaments are fun for everyone and most importantly they make alot of money.
Ugh. MSM doesn't even have a winning record. Just can't enjoy that, personally. Selection show will show them jumping around holding up the "#1" sign when it gets announced they're in the 16 seed play in game for the right to lose to Florida by 49.
And MSM isn't even a legit NEC tournament champion. In the quarterfinals, they were behind in the closing seconds, got a steal off their press, and scored to pull within 1... then won the game.
Unfortunately, they had 6 men on the court for that press and the refs didn't notice.
http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcspo...won-nec-tournament-with-six-men-on-the-court/
Boston U playing American U right now for the Patriot title on CBSSN.
BU could win a tournament game (Top 100 RPI team that played a decent OOC and has beaten good teams like UC Irvine). Would hate to see them miss the Dance.
I'm a sucker for the unpredictability of the tourney.Of course American U won.
And with as much griping as I'm doing about the small conferences not sending their best teams this season, it's a stone cold lock that I'll fill out my bracket close to chalk and we'll end up seeing a record-setting tournament for major upsets. :lol:
I'm not sure how much of a difference it will ultimately be who ends up getting the #1 overall, a somewhat decent chance these teams end up for the national title. I do think the field is wide open this year more than others, but gun to my head that would likely be my Finals matchup.I think that Arizona, Florida and Wichita are all locked into 1-seeds at this point. You're probably right that Florida will be the #1 overall seed unless they lose today or tomorrow.
Nik,
Even if UofA loses aren't they still a #1 seed? I think they need UF to lose to get the #1 overall.
You said they were playing for a #1 seed, I don't think they are. I think they're locked into no matter what happens, same with UF(as is Witchita). Only that fourth #1 seed is up for grabs.UofA is RPI #1 and Florida is #2. Cats have road wins at Michigan and San Diego State plus a win over Duke in the non-conference. Stronger resume that I think outweighs Florida having 1 fewer loss that can be explained by going undefeated in an SEC that is much weaker than the Pac-12.
You said they were playing for a #1 seed, I don't think they are. I think they're locked into no matter what happens, same with UF(as is Witchita). Only that fourth #1 seed is up for grabs.
I agree with you UofA deserves the #1 overall seed more, but that doesn't mean the committee will agree with us.
Albany will represent the Am East.
Tulsa locks up the C-USA bid.
I'd be pretty shocked if they were any worse than the #3 overall seed, I don't even think they should be be below the #2 overall seed. Any of those you means you listed I think are the last #1 seed regardless. If UofA had a loss to us, maybe they don't get a first seed.Who knows with the Committee? Could a 4-loss Arizona end up behind a 6-loss Wisconsin or Virginia or a 5-loss Louisville? Theoretically. I assume that despite the low probability of that happening, Miller will play the psychology and have his team thinking in terms of taking what they want versus backing into it and relying on the committee. I meant that intro more in terms of expecting both teams seeing a lot riding on this game and playing with intensity. (Both have had letdowns in the past couple weeks when they didn't have much of anything to play for and I don't see either treating the game that way today.)
More upsets. Really think these small conferences should reconsider how they give their auto bids.
Who knows with the Committee? Could a 4-loss Arizona end up behind a 6-loss Wisconsin or Virginia or a 5-loss Louisville? Theoretically. I assume that despite the low probability of that happening, Miller will play the psychology and have his team thinking in terms of taking what they want versus backing into it and relying on the committee. I meant that intro more in terms of expecting both teams seeing a lot riding on this game and playing with intensity. (Both have had letdowns in the past couple weeks when they didn't have much of anything to play for and I don't see either treating the game that way today.)
I tend to agree here, I think the games on Sunday don't really matter as much as well. I think the committee pretty much goes to bed with the bracket a certain way and they'll have contingency plans incase an At-L qualifies or for example which way, they'll if UVA or Duke wins (who could potentially get the #1 seed there). But I think the hard work is done for the most part.Another thing that might be working in Arizona's favor is playing its conference tournament final on Saturday while Florida plays on Sunday.
Committee, with an Arizona win, could lock UofA into the #1 overall and Florida into the #2 overall. That way, regardless of whether Florida wins or loses on Sunday they wouldn't have to make any adjustments. Florida wouldn't have to be dropped off the 2 line with its #2 RPI if they fell to 31-3 by losing to Kentucky on a neutral floor. But if Florida had been penciled in as the #1 overall and lost, it would be very hard to justify keeping them there.
(Always assume people will do things in the way that would require the least work.)
Completely agree, and you have to wonder how much money these small-conference tournaments actually make because when you see the games the arena is not only small it's often not close to being full. Unless having their title games on one of the ESPN channels makes them that much money. :huh:
And I don't mean this in a demeaning way, but to Mtn's point, how many national TV games did you have?As a Georgia State student, I'm all for changing the format. We were 17-1 in conference, now 18-1 after destroying Ark St today. But if we lose tomorrow against Western Kentucky or Lafayette, we would be out even though we beat both teams twice this year.