The garnet jersey looks like boston college. Garnet helmet looks like 1960's redskins.
Change for change's sake. Not a fan.
Bingo. You don't have to change uniforms just because all the other trend-followers are
The garnet jersey looks like boston college. Garnet helmet looks like 1960's redskins.
Change for change's sake. Not a fan.
The subsequent FSU posts tell me the above isn't Virginia Tech, but I'm telling myself it's Virginia Tech.
Huh?
Looks like VT if featuring a black jersey. The garnet looks closer to their maroon.
nice, these look sweet. I wish every team couldn't use black though. We had dibs =/
Hate the numbers. Nike says they are "tall and narrow to mimic the NYC skyline". They are awful is what they are.
Would not surprise me at all if RG planned it like thatWould love to see the new jerseys release correspond with the new facilities opening.
Hate the numbers. Nike says they are "tall and narrow to mimic the NYC skyline". They are awful is what they are.
Sick.
Clarification for the under 30s:
Better than 'Cuse. It was also a full AD rebrand so a lot changed. They are trying to get as far away from Chief Illiniwek as they can.
Link to the new Illinois unis (much easier to see the details).
So who is in favor of CU getting a secondary logo? I'm sure a lot will say Ralphie is fine, but pretty much every other school has a 2nd logo. Cal and Georgia are a couple recent programs to add a secondary logo
Idk I still think Maryland's are the worst I've seen, their **** is just ugly.