Mick Ronson
Well-Known Member
Depends on how we view it, I guess, but I'd rather be sitting on top of all that Florida talent than being at modern day Notre Dame. You're more likely to bag a couple national championships at Florida in 2014 than you are at Notre Dame. I'm not sure I wouldn't view it over OU and OSU, also.. but that's tough. OU has a nice set up in this current Big XII to make the playoff quite often. I really think the B1G 10 may fade over coming decades due to demographics. I'd certainly rather be in a place like UF where the talent you sit on top of gets better and better each year as opposed to a place like Michigan where population is plummeting. Obviously these brand name programs can go national -- I'm hardly implying Michigan will turn into Akron, but I do think it will make things more challenging.
if you want to take the state of florida talent angle, can you argue that UF is even the best job in the state of Flordia? FSU is the defending champ and have 20 years of Bowden in the top 10. Notre Dame played for the NC just a couple years ago, hard to speculate against them when they were 60 minutes away (even tho Bama was clearly the better team by a lot).
i'll stand by what i say: UF is a top 10 job. i didn't even mention FSU....oversight. i'd say that's a better job than UF...at least the argument could be made. i get the "shifting CFB landscape argument"....and current rah rah forever ESPN SEC tilt....but, having this discussion now....UF is the one in jeopardy....ND, OU, they are strong. Bama, strong. top 10 teams. UF, struggling to beat Kentucky at home. if the "now" is the argument, UF is the one in trouble. history is also against them in the atmosphere of OU, tOSU, ND, etc.
seems to me the arguments against UF as a top 5 job are stronger and multiple...
Last edited: