Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2015 National Signing Day Announcements Thread

Buffs are just waiting on the letter from Tuiloma to close out all committed players. After that waiting on Kelly.
 
I don't think a guy in Hawaii is really a straggler. Probably isn't even out of bed yet.
 
Do they allow scanned .pdf emails? How the hell much longer are we going to have to rely on fax's?

OK, so Rivals has us at #68 now. Arizona is at #39. Our average is 2.78 with 18 recruits and 14 three stars. Arizona has 25 recruits and 20 three stars with a 2.8 average. When I look at the Rivals rankings, it just seems to me that the difference between us at #68 down to about #35 or so is pretty slim. It also didn't appear to have any impact at all on our ranking when we picked up Carr. So to me, even though some will argue we are "last in the Pac XII", to me, the only reason for that is the number of kids we signed vs other schools.

Another question I have is that I thought, at one time, we were looking to sign around 25. Instead, we are at 18. Why is that? Are we carrying over some for next year and how many did we count against last year?
 
Last edited:
DBT said:
Do they allow scanned .pdf emails? How the hell much longer are we going to have to rely on fax's?

OK, so Rivals has us at #68 now. Arizona is at #39. Our average is 2.78 with 18 recruits and 14 three stars. Arizona has 25 recruits and 20 three stars with a 2.8 average. When I look at the Rivals rankings, it just seems to me that the difference between us at #68 down to about #35 or so is pretty slim. It also didn't appear to have any impact at all on our ranking when we picked up Carr. So to me, even though some will argue we are "last in the Big XII", to me, the only reason for that is the number of kids we signed vs other schools.

Another question I have is that I thought, at one time, we were looking to sign around 25. Instead, we are at 18. Why is that? Are we carrying over some for next year and how many did we count against last year?
Click to expand...

hmmm
 
DBT said:
Do they allow scanned .pdf emails? How the hell much longer are we going to have to rely on fax's?
Click to expand...

I saw UCLA has been using e-sig software:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf...-signature-option-for-recruits-053933325.html

The problem they run into with leaving the fax machines behind is that a lot of high school offices still rely on them. Plus, it works(mostly), it's simple, you don't have to worry about not getting a kid's signature because he can't figure out how to get it to you.
 
TJ Fehoko about to announce between North Carolina State, Nevada, and Washington State
 
Some drama for UCLA right now. New commit Roquan Smith says that he has not made a final decision yet and still has to fax in his paperwork.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top