And have Hagler on the sidelines eating cheeseburgers and lifting weights.Against CSU you start Callahan.
And have Hagler on the sidelines eating cheeseburgers and lifting weights.
I always wanted to be called the big Unit. That should play well.The big news today from Folsom Frenzy, is they have been rebranded.
Makes a lot of sense in terms of logistics and branding. I hope this leads to better organization and more ability to support the students from the AD.
But when his wife busted up laughing, the jig was up!I always wanted to be called the big Unit.[/B] That should play well.
I think you have those in the wrong order.But when his wife busted up laughing, the jig was up!
For comparative purposes, IMG academy's OL averages 6'4" 325 lbs...Irwin (6'-5", 295), Kough (6'-4", 295), Kelley (6'-2", 305), Lynott (6'-3", 300), Kronshage (6'-6", 295)
As listed, that is a pretty stout looking OL.
For comparative purposes, IMG academy's OL averages 6'4" 325 lbs...
Agreed. Was just joking... The Atlanta Falcons average 305 lbs. If our OL averages around 300 lbs of "good weight", we're in a good spot, physically.Sure. But when you see CU's OL they are not fat guys. These are huge dudes around 20% body fat. Pretty much an average male for that age but with a ton of muscle mass. When I look at HS OLs who are tipping the scales at 290+ and certainly at 325, they're fat.
This was one of the things that really struck me the first time I was around NFL offensive linemen. They're not fat. It's more like they are just super sized versions of regular people who also do some weight training.
Irwin (6'-5", 295), Kough (6'-4", 295), Kelley (6'-2", 305), Lynott (6'-3", 300), Kronshage (6'-6", 295)
As listed, that is a pretty stout looking OL.
Sure. But when you see CU's OL they are not fat guys. These are huge dudes around 20% body fat. Pretty much an average male for that age but with a ton of muscle mass. When I look at HS OLs who are tipping the scales at 290+ and certainly at 325, they're fat.
2d string NT. They go 4 deep there for some reason on their depth chart, so yea, I expect them to rotate a lot.I thought CSU was going to start a 300+ frosh up front? I think he'll be totally gassed by the 3rd down....
2d string NT. They go 4 deep there for some reason on their depth chart, so yea, I expect them to rotate a lot.
CSU's D-line is 6-4 270, 6-4 290, 6-4 265, and 6-4 245. CU's OL should be able to get a good push against them.
Yes - that was the guy I was referring to.Christian Colon was the guy getting all the hype that I think holic was talking about. Missed a couple weeks with a fracture in his foot and I don't see him on the depth chart.
For the last few years the Lammies have had upperclassmen (Jrs, who became Srs) at DL positions, all of whom worked against a very decent OL in practice. CS-Ewe graduated those guys and are now facing changed circumstances, with a ton of new young guys, in a new system..I agree, but we say that every year and we still seem to have trouble running it.
As I said in the radio thread, Clough is just as bad as everybody else on that station when it comes to college (CU) football.Just happened to catch a segment on Denver's 104.3 The Fan. Sandy Clough with weekly guest Chris Landry. Subject shifted from constant NFL talk to college, albeit briefly. The cynicism was heavy wrt CU. I know, big shock. Neither think even four wins is likely. They viewed JMFL as merely a MacIntyre equivalent replacement. Not an upgrade. I need to learn not to tune in.
As I said in the radio thread, Clough is just as bad as everybody else on that station when it comes to college (CU) football.