I think we as fans need to move on from the BB to LB dream. He has two years of eligibility left, and he is what he is... An OK rotational RB who provides decent snaps when needed as a FB/blocking type, and an excellent special teams player.
And a 4.5 100 meter?The guy I'm excited about for the future is Deion Smith. That was a 4* recruit if not for his injury. Legit 10.6 forty guy who I don't know we could have held onto if he had stayed healthy. I don't know if he'll be ready for 2018, but I think he's a future star for us. I like Fontenot a lot, too. It was huge, though, to land McMillian as a bridge to get to those guys sharing the load. If Evans is back to what he was in 2016 and Lee can give us a bit of what we've seen in flashes, I like this group. It's not the USC running back corp, but its solid.
I have seen nothing to suggest Beau is thinking about switching to LB other than it being a very popular topic for message board fans.
Edited. Thanks.And a 4.5 100 meter?
The running backs look better as a group, at least potentially. While there are still a lot of undersized guys being offered, there do seem to be more big, three down types getting offers.
What the **** is wrong with you? Speedy was a great Buff.We’ve come a long way from having Tony Jones and Rodney Stewart toting the rock.
What the **** is wrong with you? Speedy was a great Buff.
What the **** is wrong with you? Speedy was a great Buff.
*Their.What the **** is wrong with you, that comment is solely directed at there size. Context snow.
Edited. Thanks.
Also, I think the "undersized" thing is way overstated. Fontenot is 6'0" 190. Smith is 6'0" 180. Bisharat is 6'2" 215. McMillian is 6'0" 200. Lee and Evans are short, but they're built like brick ****houses.
Seems to me that we're actually getting bigger at RB from where we had been. Still mixing in some smaller APB types like Broussard at 5'9" 170. But Davis (2019 commit) is 5'10" 180 as a junior. That's hardly a small RB.
To be fair, didn't Fontenot get hurt his Senior year? Wasn't he an absolute dude his Junior year with monster stats as the "backup"?It is more about what they are looking for in RBs than just pure size though.
Fontenot had 91 total carries as a senior. Broussard had 67 total carries as senior. Davis had 900 yards rushing as junior (and the coaching staff offered him after seeing at WR in a 7 on 7 tourney).
Does that scream P5 RB group? Not really.
To be fair, didn't Fontenot get hurt his Senior year? Wasn't he an absolute dude his Junior year with monster stats as the "backup"?
iirc from what I read previously, Smith averaged over 10 yards a carry as a junior and was at 9.7 with 156 yards per game as a senior ahead of the mid-season ACL.It is more about what they are looking for in RBs than just pure size though.
Fontenot had 91 total carries as a senior. Broussard had 67 total carries as senior. Davis had 900 yards rushing as junior (and the coaching staff offered him after seeing at WR in a 7 on 7 tourney).
Does that scream P5 RB group? Not really.
iirc from what I read previously, Smith averaged over 10 yards a carry as a junior and was at 9.7 with 156 yards per game as a senior ahead of the mid-season ACL.
I hear you. We're not signing RBs like USC, UW, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon are. Probably also behind UA and ASU. Evaluations better be good because on paper we're in the bottom half of the conference at recruiting the position (maybe bottom 1/4).Which is fine. Take a chance on him.
But the recruiting as a whole has not been good. Fontenot better be really good (and outplay his recruiting rankings) or we are going to have issues this season and next.
Which is why I cringe everytime Elway takes one in the top 3 rounds. I'm okay with what we've done with Carr, Bisharat, Fontenot and Smith. All were pretty decently thought of at the time. I don't trust Hagan's eyes to be honest, but Smith could be the stud here.My track record hasn't been great on RB evaluations.
What was that you said? /SThe cold must be getting to you. After you were told (twice) the circumstances of Osborne’s vote, you asked again if the facts were “real.” Then for the third time someone had to repeat what anyone “who bleeds black and gold” already knows. Maybe stick with your presently underperforming hockey team-the Fighting Hawks.
LT | LG | C | RG | RT |
Haigler | Sherman? | Pursell? | Middlemiss | Kaiser |
Pursell is getting the C1 reps. He was actually better than Huckins last year and MM considered pulling his redshirt after Lynott went down but decided not to since it was so late in the season.Didn't see this posted anywhere else...
Josh Kaiser looks to provide leadership, stability at right tackle
Lists some of the "first team" at offensive line:
With Lynott out, looks like Middlemiss is getting the reps at RG. Figured Tonz might be getting some looks also at C with first team but haven't seen any reports about LG/C. Based on past comments would lean towards that being Sherman at LG and Pursell at C but is there anyone that has been to any practices or seen notes otherwise?[TBODY] [/TBODY]
LT LG C RG RT Haigler Sherman? Pursell? Middlemiss Kaiser