Don't know where to put this, but yes please. We have a connection now!
Kountz is here this weekend, too.So Sow and Parquet are on campus this weekend, with Higgs next weekend. Any word on Battin, Kountz or Hamilton? We should be getting answers on the 2018 class very soon.
Thanks Nik. I have to imagine it's either Kountz or Parquet. We'll see who pops first.Kountz is here this weekend, too.
A big is a must, with only Battey and Walton bringing any real size to next year's roster. A left handed wing is a safe bet for Tad in every cycle. They have some flexibility to go BPA with the 3rd scholarship, but my money would be on another wing. One of Parquet/Kountz plus Higgs plus Sow complements one another pretty well. They could save that final scholarship for a grad transfer, too.What's the class makeup for this year? Is it a one-to-one replacement of the scholarship players leaving? Right now we have a guard, wing, and big leaving, are we trying to duplicate that in the class?
I just don't see why recruiting should dip this year from Top 150 type guys. It's where they were with Peters and Siewert. It's where they were with the 2017 class except for the Euro recruiting. I believe that's they type of player we'll see for the 2018 class.
Parquet missed a lot of basketball with a torn rotator cuff. It's safe to assume that as he plays more, he'll get more exposure. That may correspond to a bump. A 300 spot bump? Probably not.Kountz is #306 by the 24/7 composite and Parquet is #441. It's going to take a massive leap for either of them to be top 150 type guys.
This is what happens when you have 7 (mostly) highly regarded freshmen. Hopefully one of them outplays their ranking.
Parquet missed a lot of basketball with a torn rotator cuff. It's safe to assume that as he plays more, he'll get more exposure. That may correspond to a bump. A 300 spot bump? Probably not.
This class was always going to be comprised of under-the-radar guys. I have faith in our current evaluators. Sow or another big like him is the difference maker.
I refuse to accept this statement at first read. If you actually mean, "less hyped than our last class", then sure, that's fine. If you actually do mean "under the radar", I completely disagree. We should always be getting a similar ranked class within some range, not under the radar.
Most debates are born out of two separate uses of the same keywords.
Are you talking about what we should be doing or reality? Like I posted in this thread in July, this is going to be a complementary class and the people who don't understand why are going to be upset. The circumstances of the 2017 class were unusual both in its size and quality. Let's review CU's class ranking on 24/7 for the 5 years prior to 2017:
2016: #75
2015: #126
2014: #70
2013: #55
2012: #17
2017 was a once-every-4 or 5 year class for this program. Quality recruits want to go to blue bloods or good programs with straightforward routes to playing time--hello McKinley Wright. 7 scholarship freshmen makes it very hard for recruits to forecast their playing time. With less success on the court than we had 4 years ago, it was always unreasonable to expect more than one highly-regarded prospect in this cycle.
With Sow out, I'd rather save the scholarship for the spring when we know more about what we have with this team and the transfer market heats up.
Among western Nike hoops schools, I don’t feel good about the competitionI'm refusing to get my hopes up. Nope.
What I'm seeing in the NCAA tourney with the teams having the most success is: 1 guy who is able to dictate pace as the primary ball handler, 1 guy who can guard the post and score from it, and 3 guys who play positionless basketball. I think that's a trend that is here to stay and that it fits Tad's way of doing things.Based on Adam's recent reporting and news of this Williams visit, looks like Boyle is not looking for a wing for this position. Looking at bigs and also at big time take guards. I personally prefer a guard, preferably another one who can be a legit point guard. I've grown to like watching CU play offense with a legit point guard, and I don't want to go back to the dark days. I'm also worried his focus on bigs is related to uncertainty with Big Gravy. A positive take would be that the staff thinks we scored with our two guard recruits already in the fold. I may also just be seeing something that's not there
What I'm seeing in the NCAA tourney with the teams having the most success is: 1 guy who is able to dictate pace as the primary ball handler, 1 guy who can guard the post and score from it, and 3 guys who play positionless basketball. I think that's a trend that is here to stay and that it fits Tad's way of doing things.