Because there weren’t any NFL tight end coaches available.I'm wondering why we hired an NFL WR coach to be the HC.
Because there weren’t any NFL tight end coaches available.I'm wondering why we hired an NFL WR coach to be the HC.
Boooo!Because there weren’t any NFL tight end coaches available.
Nah. Lindsay was an incredible receiving RBFontenot is probably the best receiving rb CU has had in a while. Mangham is the better runner. Neither is a homerun threat from what we’ve seen. Clayton seems to have all of those qualities, so should know by the end of the year.
Won’t happen, but I would see if Mangham would try out ILB.
Howell mentioned in his chat today that the offense will not be like last years.
Bowl game!So 7 games, 3-4.
Fontenot seemed to have the better burst through the hole when it was there, but not a guy who was creating on his own. Mangham has more of the Le'Veon Bell style of running, IMO, where he is more patient, waits for things to develop and then hits the hole. I also feel like Mangham has the better break tackle ability.
We're also talking about a third year player vs a true freshman last year. I wouldn't be surprised to see Mangham continue to get better as he continues to develop
How was the running games less effective during conference play?I agree with Gary and you. We have to remember that Mangham played as a true freshman. He should get bigger, stronger, and faster, plus with experience I'd expect him to improve. Clayton is a great recruit, but he will have to grow onto the field. Mangham's numbers dropped in conference play, however the running game overall was much less effective in conference play. It is never a bad thing to have 3 good running backs... Even if he slots in 3rd string, he is still one injury away.
When do we get the schedule
Sometime this week according to Wilner. I haven't seen anything more specific than that
I've been away for awhile...who is this Clayton guy everybody is so high on?
I've been away for awhile...who is this Clayton guy everybody is so high on?
How was the running games less effective during conference play?
I've been away for awhile...who is this Clayton guy everybody is so high on?
Not really, the run game was pretty consistent last year.Per my recollection, someone can correct me if I am wrong, but the ypc went down; the RB production was down some, especially when LaViska was either running or out with an injury; and I think the 15+ yard carries were way down. AF did have a few good games, but I remember the execution with additional procedure or false start penalties. Also, the Buffs could not close out a couple of games in the 4Q, when they just needed a 1st down, and had a decent down and distance. In the two great home in-conference wins, the running game was better.
Here is another tidbit that seems to run counter to the report you reference.Question. We are reported to be one of 5 schools who were against playing is that due to the fact that our team has not been able practice?
Just in case anybody still believes the UCLA piece saying CU wasn't in favor of playing this whole time.