Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2020 Recruit Profile Index & Recruiting News

HCMT is workin' his @$$ off. He won't get all of those guys but I'd put good money down that he starts to get those big studs rollin' in. Good stuff.
 
Just need a couple of these big offers to pop and it would create crazy momentum for the rest of the class.
 
Seems like we're swinging for the fences here. I like it a lot. Start getting these kids to campus and we'll be in good shape
 
Makes one wonder if the fact that the previous staff was so reluctant to pursue 4* and 5* recruits sent a message that the program was inferior? If I were a top level athlete, I would have my doubts when the majority of CU recruits were 3* and projects.
 
WarBuff said:
Makes one wonder if the fact that the previous staff was so reluctant to pursue 4* and 5* recruits sent a message that the program was inferior? If I were a top level athlete, I would have my doubts when the majority of CU recruits were 3* and projects.
Click to expand...

I think you’re on to something here. Macintyre set boundaries in his mind about the limits of what’s possible. Tucker is not a limits kind of person. “Roads? Where we’re going, we won’t need roads”.
 
Just like cold calling in sales, it's a numbers game. According to 247, CU had around 208 offers out there this cycle, 85 (41% of the total) of which were to 4 and 5* prospects. Of those 85 offers, 8 (9.5% of the 85) are listed as having visited (assuming OVs) and only 1 (Huffman Dixon) committed. There is still a small chance Ford could add to the list but doubtful.

1. Can MT and staff increase the number of offers given and in turn, increase the number of 4 and 5* offers? That shouldn't be hard, IMO.
2. Can MT and staff get more than ~10% of those 4 and 5* offers in on visits? If they are the recruiters we have been told they are, that shouldn't be hard, IMO.
3. Can MT and staff close more than 12% of those 4 and 5* prospects who end up visiting? If they are the recruiters we have been told they are, that shouldn't be hard, IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top