AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
24-25 MBB Team
- Thread starter Buffsbball
- Start date
You ready to roll with Hammond (if he doesn't follow the rest), Ruffin or a R/S freshman as our primary ball handlers? How about as ALL of our ball handlers?
If we would just have a roster consisting of 8 PGs, 2 post players and 2 wings, we wouldn't be in this situation would we?!?
Wrong login @Darth Snow
What situation is that, a team that can rebound?
Come on man. I have TWO post players!
One can hope...
No, and I would bet Tad is looking to upgrade at PG regardless if Hammond comes back or not.
Damn, I guess this is the appropriate level of trolling in @Goose eyes. Taking notes.
Seriously, up your game. I hate having @Darth Snow be right.
This one was aimed exclusively at me.
Your sanctimonius posts on nearly ever topic related to CU basketball gets very old. You seem to really enjoy criticizing the CU fan base more than you do winning.
seattlebuff
Well-Known Member
Well, this is gonna be the most depressing and/or exciting offseason in recent CU hoops history!
I want to be optimistic about Diop and Dak ... but basically we've only see them 1. rotate the ball in the offense, 2. throw down the occasional alley oop, 3. get mostly worked on defense down low. Still a mystery to me whether they're legit contributors. I'm skeptical.
Hammond is Collier 2.0 = not the answer. I can't recall what RJ looked like, but he showed OK in the box score anyway.
Man, if that last 2 minutes vs Marquette would have gone better, this uncertainty might not sting so much.
I want to be optimistic about Diop and Dak ... but basically we've only see them 1. rotate the ball in the offense, 2. throw down the occasional alley oop, 3. get mostly worked on defense down low. Still a mystery to me whether they're legit contributors. I'm skeptical.
Hammond is Collier 2.0 = not the answer. I can't recall what RJ looked like, but he showed OK in the box score anyway.
Man, if that last 2 minutes vs Marquette would have gone better, this uncertainty might not sting so much.
No, I love winning. Pissing tools like you off is just a nice bonus.
Tad has only had one losing season in 2014-25 (holy **** that was 10 years ago!), the floor is pretty high, and that team had all kinds of issues that talent wasn't one of the big ones.
Given that, he may be looking at his second losing season next year, but then again, it may also surprise us.
Given that, he may be looking at his second losing season next year, but then again, it may also surprise us.
But, you really prefer criticizing CU fans to winning. It's quite obvious. Have your written your big NIL check yet?
GoBuffs99
Karl Dorrell's Sock
Thinking the coaches from Seattle, Loyola Marymount, and UC Santa Barbara would leave for a power conference job/paycheck is an example of “dramatically high expectations?”
wtf are you talking about?
Bryce Drew was a disaster at Vandy. Will Wade is at Mcneese State wow and has baggage. Chris Mack has been unemployed for several years. The JMU coach just took the job at vaunted Vandy.
With a few exceptions that list is completely realistic.
GoBuffs99
Karl Dorrell's Sock
Tad’s base salary is #52 in the country. Not great but respectable.
His total buyout (guaranteed money he were to be fired) ranks #27.
And the amount of money he could potentially earn from performance bonuses ranks #6.
Some of you all act like his contact/the potential template for the next coaches contract is awful.
His total buyout (guaranteed money he were to be fired) ranks #27.
And the amount of money he could potentially earn from performance bonuses ranks #6.
Some of you all act like his contact/the potential template for the next coaches contract is awful.
I'm shocked that people are caught off guard by this. We were always going to lose a ton of players this year. We were always going to suck next year.
That is why people cared so much about going deep this year.
That is why people cared so much about going deep this year.
MCskid
Well-Known Member
Exactly, this was the year for a sweet 16 run with a chance for something more, that why it was such a brutal loss.
Robert Sorell
Well-Known Member
If two of your PGs are Kin and KJ types and you get one Bey/Roberson type as a wing/big tweener then definitely a team that rebounds.
jumped ship
Well-Known Member
damn Goose is on one today, I'm here for it
just to confirm, Tad is still the CU coach yeah?
just to confirm, Tad is still the CU coach yeah?
Check back in a week…..
Until Friday. Doom comes