I agree that two years might be jumping the gun, but I think we can start making good judgements after next season. We have a manageable non-conference schedule (don't even leave the state) and we likely do not have to go above .500 in conference play to get a bowl. With a team that will be returning a lot on offense and a fair amount on defense too, that is not an unreasonable expectation. If we are sitting here in December 2013 and there is no bowl game (under the assumption we do not make one in 2012), we are likely looking at two very bad recruiting classes in 2013 and 2014. What's the point of continuing the experiment at that point? To fulfill some mythical obligation to coaches?
Sorry if I think a former coach who has been out of the game for the better part of two decades should not be the deciding voice in the debate. I appreciate all Mac did for us in the past, but the program should not live or die by his word in 2012.
I agree 100%. But that's not entirely my point....my point was more along the lines that, while having been out of the game for 2 decades, he still knows more about the sport and the profession than any expert on here by a factor of 10. That in mind, one of his immediate assessments of the Embree hire combined with the state of the program at the time, was "patience"