Logic is flawed for both posts.
Originally Posted by buffsyko
I agree with most of what you said but we have to stop blowing off not getting dt's. No excuses, none,notta,zip. I'm going to post a list of every DT 3* and above still undecided and you will find that there is no way in hell, cu can't sign one of these guys. I've heard this bs every year for the last 7-8 years, i'm done.
I'm 100% in agreement with syko. Each year we come up with an excuse why next year is going to be different. Have we not learned the key to a great defense starts up front? Most of you will say yes, but thanks for stating the obvious Stampede. Well I ask you, if it's so obvious, why do we repeatedly accept the lack of success recruiting this area? I'm all for drinking the cool-aid and believe our future is bright, but we're never going to compete let alone win a NC without having 1 or 2 dominant DTs.
Originally Posted by buffsyko
I agree with most of what you said but we have to stop blowing off not getting dt's. No excuses, none,notta,zip. I'm going to post a list of every DT 3* and above still undecided and you will find that there is no way in hell, cu can't sign one of these guys. I've heard this bs every year for the last 7-8 years, i'm done.
I'm 100% in agreement with syko. Each year we come up with an excuse why next year is going to be different. Have we not learned the key to a great defense starts up front? Most of you will say yes, but thanks for stating the obvious Stampede. Well I ask you, if it's so obvious, why do we repeatedly accept the lack of success recruiting this area? I'm all for drinking the cool-aid and believe our future is bright, but we're never going to compete let alone win a NC without having 1 or 2 dominant DTs.