He's at 52 after yesterday and is averaging 13/game so assuming he keeps the average right around 13 we're looking at roughly 156 tacklesWhat is he on pace to finish with?
He's at 52 after yesterday and is averaging 13/game so assuming he keeps the average right around 13 we're looking at roughly 156 tacklesWhat is he on pace to finish with?
Thats Luke Kuechly esqHe's at 52 after yesterday and is averaging 13/game so assuming he keeps the average right around 13 we're looking at roughly 156 tackles
All 2 stars with no other offers turn into amazing players!
No way he amasses 82 tackles. That's not a knock on him though, just a pretty impressive number.
Okay, I'll take this opportunity to admit that I probably will be eating these words. Happy to do so.
Don't want to bring up potential problems but at the rate he's going do we see Gillam playing college football for 4 years? Because of the grayshirt he becomes draft eligible after his soph year. Kid looks like anything he doesn't have yet he can develop. Plays the run, plays the pass.
Seems to me that he is still very raw. I'd think he will need to take as much time in college as he can to refine his gifts. After all, this is only his second year, really, playing football. The kid is a savant.Don't want to bring up potential problems but at the rate he's going do we see Gillam playing college football for 4 years? Because of the grayshirt he becomes draft eligible after his soph year. Kid looks like anything he doesn't have yet he can develop. Plays the run, plays the pass.
Seems to me that he is still very raw. I'd think he will need to take as much time in college as he can to refine his gifts. After all, this is only his second year, really, playing football. The kid is a savant.
Don't want to bring up potential problems but at the rate he's going do we see Gillam playing college football for 4 years? Because of the grayshirt he becomes draft eligible after his soph year. Kid looks like anything he doesn't have yet he can develop. Plays the run, plays the pass.
Darn! That makes sense. It was probably something the NubDuck at the Post wrote.Apparently the "only his second year playing football" is a media myth. When CU had him dorks to the media after the Colo State game, a media member asked him about it, and he said that he did not know where the story came from, and that he has been playing football since he was six years old.
Apparently the "only his second year playing football" is a media myth. When CU had him dorks to the media after the Colo State game, a media member asked him about it, and he said that he did not know where the story came from, and that he has been playing football since he was six years old.
I can't help but think about the difference in expectations vs. reality between Gillam and Jon Major
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
No doubt, I didn't mean to knock Jon as he was one of my favorite players we've had in this tough time. He was a good linebacker and a great leader for this team while he was here, and he definitely played with a lot of heart. I merely meant to point out the difference in hype that the two linebackers came into this program with.I understand what you are saying but I will never get down on Jon. He is a guy who had a lot of other options and stayed at home going to CU. The dissapointment came when he couldn't keep his knees healthy. With multiple knee injuries he ended up significantly less mobile. He still played hard and gave it his all despite his limitations.
No doubt, I didn't mean to knock Jon as he was one of my favorite players we've had in this tough time. He was a good linebacker and a great leader for this team while he was here, and he definitely played with a lot of heart. I merely meant to point out the difference in hype that the two linebackers came into this program with.
Addison Gillam is not only physically good, but what I really like about him is...HE WANTS TO WIN. On another positive note: The California RB we just picked up is a playmaker with speed and moves. Another under the radar recruit.
That must be what we've been doing wrong for the last 8 years - recruiting players who don't want to win.
You mean like Cody who never lost a HS game?Read Gillam's ESPN interview; you're more right than you think. There's a world of difference recruiting kids from winning HS programs where raw talent usually prevails to recruiting kids who want to develop the attitude and put in the time necessary to win at the college level; i.e. film study and getting it down in practice. Contrast Gillam and his film study attitude with a certain 4* DB who apparently thought Ladies Night in the Boulder bars was more important than film study last year.
Think of it as the differnce between kids who want to play and those who need to play. WB recruited the former; HCMM appears to target the latter group.