Updated stats. We're given a 73% - 79% chance of winning in each of our remaining games.
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2016-colorado-advanced-statistical-profile
I think I'm going to have to call my doctor in 4 hours.Updated stats. We're given a 73% - 79% chance of winning in each of our remaining games.
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2016-colorado-advanced-statistical-profile
passing offense is "all" the way down to #4 after the last two weeks. but the rushing offense has improved considerably. And oh yea, that defense... damn.Updated stats. We're given a 73% - 79% chance of winning in each of our remaining games.
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2016-colorado-advanced-statistical-profile
passing offense is "all" the way down to #4 after the last two weeks. but the rushing offense has improved considerably. And oh yea, that defense... damn.
Oh yea, damn.
Gotta get off the ViagraI think I'm going to have to call my doctor in 4 hours.
passing offense is "all" the way down to #4 after the last two weeks. but the rushing offense has improved considerably. And oh yea, that defense... damn.
Oh yea, damn.
Yes. That was the joke. See, he's really excited.Gotta get off the Viagra
In three quarters with our starting QB.oh, and Michigan's O isn't that great, but their D is playing at historic levels.
Points CU put up against Michigan: 28.
Points six other teams have put up against michigan, combined: 42.
Is it time to change "UBL" to "LVB"?Yes. That was the joke. See, he's really excited.
I feel Miami is the more consistent culpritIs it time to change "UBL" to "LVB"?
2016 S&P+ rankings, preseason through Week 8
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Team Record Preseason After 1 After 2 After 3 After 4 After 5 After 6 After 7 After 8 Michigan 7-0 6 4 4 1 2 3 2 1 1 Louisville 6-1 18 14 14 8 4 5 5 5 2 Alabama 8-0 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 Clemson 7-0 2 2 2 6 5 4 4 4 4 Ohio State 6-1 11 9 7 5 1 1 3 3 5 Washington 7-0 10 11 9 4 11 6 7 6 6 Auburn 5-2 25 23 24 22 26 17 12 8 7 LSU 5-2 3 3 3 3 19 9 8 7 8 Florida 5-1 20 20 16 9 7 8 10 9 9 Wisconsin 5-2 36 33 29 20 16 18 25 13 10 Baylor 6-0 19 18 15 14 12 15 16 14 11 Virginia Tech 5-2 33 31 37 24 14 14 19 16 12 Oklahoma 5-2 4 6 5 7 21 12 6 12 13 Florida State 5-2 5 5 6 10 13 13 9 15 14 Texas A&M 6-1 23 27 21 19 10 11 13 11 15 Penn State 5-2 28 26 26 28 44 38 17 20 16 Colorado 6-2 86 82 75 67 43 31 34 19 17 Boise State 7-0 37 40 41 34 18 22 26 22 18 Ole Miss 3-4 7 8 8 11 8 7 11 10 19 USC 4-3 9 10 11 16 34 21 18 23 20 West Virginia 6-0 35 34 40 40 48 47 49 24 21 Nebraska 7-0 27 28 25 29 23 23 24 21 22 Miami-FL 4-3 31 35 33 15 6 10 14 17 23 Western Michigan 8-0 63 69 62 60 59 48 61 28 24 San Diego State 6-1 50 46 46 47 50 59 42 31 25
Gotta get off the Buffagra
New rank | Team | scoring O | rushing O | passing O | scoring D | rushing D | passing D | turnover margin | penalty yards | Sagarin SOS | AVG RANK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Michigan Michigan | 3 | 13 | 72 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 18 | 50 | 19.1 |
2 | Alabama Alabama | 6 | 8 | 66 | 6 | 1 | 32 | 33 | 39 | 11 | 22.4 |
3 | Colorado Colorado | 38 | 35 | 33 | 20 | 41 | 22 | 5 | 19 | 22 | 26.1 |
4 | Washington Washington | 2 | 23 | 34 | 8 | 61 | 9 | 1 | 25 | 85 | 27.6 |
5 | Ohio State Ohio State | 5 | 6 | 77 | 5 | 22 | 4 | 8 | 92 | 40 | 28.8 |
6 | Auburn Auburn | 27 | 3 | 95 | 3 | 28 | 28 | 51 | 6 | 19 | 28.9 |
7 | Western Michigan Western Michigan | 10 | 20 | 46 | 17 | 32 | 54 | 2 | 29 | 95 | 33.9 |
8 | Louisville Louisville | 1 | 4 | 13 | 29 | 18 | 17 | 68 | 124 | 42 | 35.1 |
9 | LSU LSU | 55 | 17 | 96 | 7 | 5 | 30 | 54 | 37 | 21 | 35.8 |
10 | Virginia Tech Virginia Tech | 26 | 41 | 58 | 14 | 10 | 51 | 54 | 34 | 49 | 37.4 |
#17 makes more sense to me than #23.http://www.footballstudyhall.com/20...t=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
this is beautiful. FYI, #17 now that preseason expectations are out.
We're still 17 after Stanford. Stanford was our second worst game of the year too.http://www.footballstudyhall.com/20...t=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
this is beautiful. FYI, #17 now that preseason expectations are out.
Weighting a bunch of categories evenly and ranking by the average is okay, but they should be somewhat related, such as offense ranks and defense ranks and turnover ranks. Really weird to include Sagarin SOS with on-the-field performance stats and on-the-field performance rankings.I can't make heads or tails of that Reddit system (I think he ****ed up somewhere), but I like it.
RANK | NAME | TEAM | CL | POSITION | G | FF | FFPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jimmie Gilbert | Colorado | Sr. | DL | 8 | 5 | .63 |
2 | James Hearns | Louisville | Jr. | DB | 7 | 4 | .57 |
- | Micah Kiser | Virginia | Jr. | LB | 7 | 4 | .57 |
- | Harold Landry | Boston College | Jr. | DL | 7 | 4 | .57 |
5 | Rodney Allen | Marshall | Jr. | DB | 6 | 3 | .50 |
Yet another stat for the year. Points allowed is perhaps the best defensive stat to have.
EDIT: Considering we gave up 38 to UO, this is an amazing number. The following games were 6, 21, 16, and 5.
Yet another stat for the year. Points allowed is perhaps the best defensive stat to have.
EDIT: Considering we gave up 38 to UO, this is an amazing number. The following games were 6, 21, 16, and 5.
He's toastOregon is giving up 53.5 ppg in conf. That's Embree bad.