What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Answer the question

Plus, I did say answer the question, I never said I wouldn't say what the correct answer was. People were just wrong, and I was correcting them so they could learn of their mistakes. WINNING!
 
62-36 exposed the fuskers as a fraud. A win over KU would do no such thing, as KU is anything but a fraud. I would equate this to the 20-3 victory over OU in 1989. The "Things have Changed" game.

I would go back a bit further than that to the 20-10 victory over Nebraska in 86. Things had already changed by 89.
 
Back
Top