Deleted member 807
Guest
I'm pretty much with you.
But I do sort of come back to C. What would you need to see from him in order to give him that chance?
I could actually see a path back; but I don't think he's capable of travelling that path (for starters he would have to really understand that the actions he took and decisions he made were terrible and wrong, and he's so far away from that first step that's it's silly to even talk about what steps 2-7 would/should be).
OTOH, I've been wrong about people's ability to undergo meaningful change before.
Conditions of hiring Briles
1) disclosure of fact regarding his dealings with Ukuwauchu and Elliot, the accusers, and the Baylor compliance apparatus.
An AD should consider the facts. This means having transparency into what Briles did right and wrong. Where Briles acted inappropriately, what did he learn that would keep him from repeating those mistakes?
2) Post scandal PR
Did Brials cut a seven or eight figure check to NSRV and other community resources that address sexual assault awareness and victim support?
If Briles only points to the 13 page PH as what happened and does not make a material contribution towards education and prevention about sexual and domestic violence, then **** him.
Last edited by a moderator: