broncos1
Member
I know Hawk would have tried to go for the win.
He sure would have...better to lose trying that to try not at all
I know Hawk would have tried to go for the win.
I agree with this statement! There are a lot of good coaches out there that arent necessarily great all the time. No one is great all the time and it is unfair to expect that. At the same time, it is easy to identify bad coaches when you see one.
Definitely done arguing my opinion on this one. I give in. Bill Stewart for Coach of the Year!
He's got my vote...:thumbsup:
I am going to start a website-billstewartcoachoftheyear.com. I got three votes already:lol:
The point has completely flown about a mile over your head hasn't it. Every post you make just supports exactly what I am saying.
So after watching this game.
it's either
"Worst coached game I have EVER seen"
or
"Bill Stewart for Coach of the Year!"
There is no middle ground with you. Is it that hard to admit that you are marginalizing a good win for CU over a good program in WVU. Or do you truly believe that the only reason CU won this game was because of poor clock management by WVU.
Did WVU coach the perfect game. No one said that. Did they make some mistakes. Yes.
EVERY GAME EVER PLAYED HAS GOOD AND BAD DECISION during the course of the game. This game was no different.
To call it the "Worst coached game I have EVER seen" and then to think that we were only able to win by 3 in OT against the team that had the "Worst coached game I have EVER seen" doesn't speak well for our coaching staff now does it.
Okay, Bill Stewart for 53rd Best Coach of the Year Award! Whatever you want to hear big guy!
I have to disagree with you about the clock management issue. The head coach has the responsibility for the overall management of the football game. I'm sure Stewart has value as a football coach - but head coach is the leader and ultimate decision maker. He should have been totally in control of the last 60 seconds of a game, not the OC. Those are the kinds of decisions that win or lose close football games. If you cut him that slack, then who do you hold as responsible?
I have to disagree with you about the clock management issue. The head coach has the responsibility for the overall management of the football game. I'm sure Stewart has value as a football coach - but head coach is the leader and ultimate decision maker. He should have been totally in control of the last 60 seconds of a game, not the OC. Those are the kinds of decisions that win or lose close football games. If you cut him that slack, then who do you hold as responsible? I would be very interested to read Stewart's response to the clock management, especially since WVU only needed about 12 more yards to kick a field goal, and had 60 seconds to do it.
Stewart said he had his reasons for not taking timeouts. The only problem is that his reasons include a lack of faith in his offense and defense (not getting the first would put the Buffs at midfield with 2 TOs left). To me, a head coach that doesn't believe in the team is only going to have problems. I know Hawk would have tried to go for the win.
I really have to wonder if he didn't like his chances better in OT. Let's face it, White is a great athlete but not a passer. CU dropped an easy pick six earlier in the 4th and Stewart might well have thought that he ran a risk of something similar happening if White had to rush the ball down the field. And with their running threats and the fact that CU hadn't scored since early in the first, and with WVU having the kicking edge on paper, I thought Stewart might have been playing it intentionally close to the vest, more than willing to take his chances with OT... :huh:
Or maybe he's just the worst coach ever. I'm really not sure... :smile2: