We are now listed as a 10 seed. Wouldn't be a bad place to finish but at this point, I am more concerned with making the tourney than anything else.
Yep, I'll worry about seeding later. Right now, I'm just concerned about making it. I don't think 7-10 makes too much difference for the first round, much more about the draw.We are now listed as a 10 seed. Wouldn't be a bad place to finish but at this point, I am more concerned with making the tourney than anything else.
Yep, I'll worry about seeding later. Right now, I'm just concerned about making it. I don't think 7-10 makes too much difference for the first round, much more about the draw.
Winning four games should be about the status quo, maybe a little above. 3 games probably below. 5 games would be a definite upgrade.Lunardi has us as one of the last four byes. Maybe I'm being too optimistic, but I think we'll do better than that. If we finish as top 4 or 5 in the conference and beat UofA we should have the strength of schedule and the quality wins needed to get in with an 8 or 9 seed. I'm not sure what goes on behind the scenes during Selection Sunday, but the committee may dock us for not having Dinwiddie. However, if we finish off the season by winning 2 games at home and 2 games away, we should be a lock for a decent seed and not one of the last four byes. A Buffs victory over UCLA would probably do wonders for us in terms of seeding, huge opportunity if we can pull off a road sweep here.
The Buffaloes have wins over Kansas, Oregon and Harvard, all of which came at home, and all of which came before the season ending injury to star Spencer Dinwiddie. Colorado needs to reprove themselves to the committee now. They have four road games in the final six, so the real test is ahead.
Not too concerned with our projected opponents other than because it's fun to talk about, we still haven't locked down a spot even. I'm more concerned where we are seeded than anything else.Lunardi now has us projected with the Tarheels as the 7-10 pairing. NO THANK YOU.
50. Colorado Buffaloes (Previous ranking: 54)
With Spencer Dinwiddie in the lineup, this would be a team to watch in March. Without him, you have to admire the fight, because Colorado will not quit. The Buffs have won four of five.
Buffs keep winning but they may lose so not gonna rank them higher.
Do not want VCU. Was talking to TZ about this on twitter. We have a pretty valid argument to be seeded higher than KSU, Umass, Pitt, and Memphis.
That be good revenge from 2011 Selection Sunday, even if they're argument was bolstered by the Final Four run.Do not want VCU. Was talking to TZ about this on twitter. We have a pretty valid argument to be seeded higher than KSU, Umass, Pitt, and Memphis.
That be good revenge from 2011 Selection Sunday, even if they're argument was bolstered by the Final Four run.
I think VCU took away our spot more than those teams.Sure. Whatever they can use for motivation they should use.
Personally, I was much more upset about the Penn State and USC selections that year.
we need to move up or move down, no question. My guess is that we will probably move up a bit by the end of the year. hoping for win vs az, @ utah & split in the bay area.
Hard to see us getting above a 7 seed, so it's going to all remain about the same unless we stumble or get snubbed into an 11 or 12
If we can win 3 of these last 5 and advance in the Pac-12 tourney, I expect our RPI and closing record to push the Buffs into a 6-seed or better. It helps that there simply aren't many teams in the west that are justified as sub-8 seeds. Zona, UCLA and SDSU with CU, Gonzaga, New Mexico and ASU lurking. That's light for the MT & PT zones.
I think KU will want to win regardless of who they are facing in a win-or-go-home tourney.If we get up to a 6, just don't let us get in KU's bracket. They would want some serious revenge.