What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Buffs are 4 point dogs @ USC

USC has given up a pant load of points thus season. The buffs win if it becomes a track meet.
 
Leavitt and Buffaloes D, especially the DBs, against a frosh QB bodes well for Saturday.
 
Just to be clear. The women are required to have large trust funds. I've seen some very attractive European women with hairy armpits that no one would kick of bed for eating crackers. So yes, I'll allow some hair in the armpits under certain conditions.

Is the rise real? We'll find out in 3 weeks.
Worry about your own ****ing schedule and who is going to expose Nebraska first.
 
This worries me.
http://www.wearesc.com/2016/10/02/defensively-speaking-asu-review-2/
We used the standard front (4-3 hybrid or Pendergast’s 5-2) less than 1/3 of the time. We used multiple fronts with 5, 6 and 7 on the LOS (line of scrimmage) or crowded the LOS. Most pressure came from the edges but with pretty good containment we forced the QB into pressure and ultimately out of the game. We also used delayed read blitzes (Hutchings mostly) and I noticed that these delayed read blitz is based on the RB in the backfield and no pass threat to that side and then rushed but with lane control…good discipline. We also used some CB blitzes out of nickel package and then used Jackson on man cover on that side…good scheme and execution. The success is based upon putting pressure on the QB which we were successful doing for the first time this season.
Montez has overall done ok against standard pressure, but blitzes and all out assaults have really given him problems, either from him not seeing it, checking out of it, or just something going wrong with the protection called (one reason we don't see donovan lee much anymore...). OSU did really slow him down in the second half with blitzes, and we all know what Michigan did.

Not as worried about Sefo if he can go, but only if he's able to be mobile.
 
Please don't do this to another thread.
Over at stampede there is like 5 threads on it. I don't understand why people can't read the "Sefo or Montez" thread and post their opinion in there. Feel like these people got educated at CSU or Nebraska.
 
we can win this game at usc. we can. there isn't a team left on the schedule that we simply can't beat and there isn't a team left on the schedule that can't beat us.

usc is playing better every week and they have the athletes to be very, very good. on the road, against a team we've never beaten, who has more athletes and depth, and who is also trending up... that's a big ask. i will say this: if our Buffs win this, it will be a very important win for this team and for the program. expectations are going to go up 10000% with a win. we're in for some bumps this season-- there are just too many good teams ahead of us and we're simply not all the way back yet. but, every week, we can compete and we can win. so, let's go get these guys. a win over usc would be a big deal, coming from where we've been these last 10 years.
Hopefully Christmas comes early this year...
 
Hey @BuffSurveyor must have stopped wringing his hands over the Fusker National Anthem protest long enough to sign on to Allbuffs. Not to worry, he'll be back to beating off to Tom Osborne pictures soon enough. It's pretty rich that a Fusker sycophant is questioning the Rise.
 
Back
Top