True, but well disciplined teams with experience can beat more athletic teams (good coaching matters here too) as well. Even though we lack experience the speed will definitely help, but it's going to be on our coaching staff to get the team ready.
IMO, this is going to be a year that defines Embree's leadership and coaching ability. No, I'm thinking we are still going to suck and not do very well, but this is going to be a year where we are going to see if players always know their assignments and are mentally tough to battle back even when UO scores 2 minutes into the game at Autzen. Are we going to be demoralized like last year and the game will be over then? Are we going to try and battle like we did against USC and try and hit them first? Are we going to let games like UCLA happen again? We were the walking dead after 5 minutes. Disgusting. We can't have signs here and there of a team that wants to win sometimes. We can't just show up when we want to. The team has to be ready to compete every week. I don't care if it's Fresno or Oregon, from top to bottom the team needs to care. I don't care if it's a short week. I don't care if we had a bye.
Those are more important to me for the lifeline of the program. If we don't make serious progress on that Embree isn't going to be the man going forward. If a guy knows his assignment, but gets beat on a juke or the OT gets beat on a swim move that's ok to me (to a certain extent) as long as their technique isn't so sloppy that it doesn't happen over and over and over again. Are we going to trust our guys, but also give them support to make sure if they mess up we gave up a TD in a way that lets the opposing side know to continue to throw that way or the RB to go that way?
Everything Embree is doing right now is fine with me. People question the # of QBs we have, but if we finally have some D1 talent at QB and have a real QB competition then I'm ok with that. Embree is setting the tone, but now it's up to him to finish what he started.