JimmyBuff
Well-Known Member
I believe you are forgetting about one Dan Hawkins.
:lol: Let's not go where Hawk is in the Big 12 in terms of coaching rank. :smile2:
I believe you are forgetting about one Dan Hawkins.
Bronco's a pretty classy guy.
I don't know. I could see them winning a bunch in a row and getting the early season loss "bye" by the pollsters.Gonna be a long year for the Sooners me thinks. I see probable 4 or 5 losses.
Thanks for ****ing up a great day by the Big 12 Sooners!
Buckle up for an other round of 'why there ought to be a playoff' talk.
I don't know. I could see them winning a bunch in a row and getting the early season loss "bye" by the pollsters.
Edit:
I am referring to the AP Poll BS rule: the bigger the team name the more willing the pollsters are willing to overlook early season losses.
I don't know. I could see them winning a bunch in a row and getting the early season loss "bye" by the pollsters.
Edit:
I am referring to the AP Poll BS rule: the bigger the team name the more willing the pollsters are willing to overlook early season losses.
Buckle up for an other round of 'why there ought to be a playoff' talk.
Why? Will a playoff assist Stoops in winning those type of games?
If BYU wins out, they still won't make the mNC. Same arguement Boise will make. Same arguement Utah made last year.
I think they would. Don't forget that they also have FSU on their schedule, and I'm not talking about Fresno State.
If BYU runs the table, including wins over OU, Florida State, Utah and TCU, they have an SOS arguement.
But if there are other undefeated teams from a BCS conf, then the cougars would be on the outside looking in.
Any pair of undefeated teams from the likes of Florida, USC, Texas, OSU and even Notre Dame would bust BYU's BCS buster bubble.
I absolutely agree. What a huge piece of bad judgement on his part. OU loses 3-4 this season, at least! This just became a one team conference.Bradford made a mistake coming back this season having lost virtually his entire line.
I hope he heals quickly and gets through the rest of the season healthy.
Bradford has no chance this year with his Oline, they are very young (in the sense that they havent played much) and he will not put up the same numbers as last year, not even close
They didn't score that many when he was in. Has the O been significantly impacted by him not being out there? They struggled before he went out and they are still struggling without him. To me they seem to be performing at about the same level. I don't think Bradford adds a whole lot to the O. JMHO
Correct. OU looked awful on offensive all night. Not a good O-Line at this point makes a Heisman winner look pretty ordinary!
Put me in the camp of those that say an experienced offensive line is the best barometer for how a team is going to perform. Oregon and Oklahoma showed how much an inexperienced o-line will stall a powerhouse offense. BYU too, even though they won. I predict they'll lose at least 2 games this year, probably 3.