It's too early to write off the sophomores...
They will be marginal role players but at a budding program with no history like Colorado, there's no room for error. Every miss is a devastating miss.
They have two years left to progress, it's too early.They will be marginal role players but at a budding program with no history like Colorado, there's no room for error. Every miss is a devastating miss.
They have two years left to progress, it's too early.
Dustin and Hopkins have both improved since last year. Why is Talton getting no blame here? He's an upperclassmen who has done nothing this year in games against a team with a pulse.You can't just repeat the same mantra with no justification. I'm telling you it's, as CVille attests, 'a big whiff.' It is a correct assessment and WILL be verified in time.
They have two years left to progress, it's too early.
Dustin and Hopkins have both improved since last year. Why is Talton getting no blame here? He's an upperclassmen who has done nothing this year in games against a team with a pulse.
Umm, no. This class is done. They have shown us zero for two years and there are zero signs that's going to ever change. DT is the only Soph that actually might be better than mediocre some day.
No he's notHopkins is the same player as last year. The SAME.
No he's not
Tini is right, Hopkins is:
Playing slightly more
Shooting slightly less
Shooting much more effectively
Taking better shots
Passing the ball more effectively
The only places he hasn't improved are in:
TOs
FT shooting.
Fletcher has been roughly the same player he was last year which considering the injury isnt that big of a surprise, his performances have also been really streaky, he's either very good, or very bad, with very little in the middle.
Hate to say it, but the best chance for an impact player from the 2013 class, might be George King. Fletcher has all the tools, but he hasn't put together the offensive game yet
Considering Hopkins' somewhat ballyhooed recruitment, being microscopically better is just not enough. Coupled with the aggregate problems amongst Talton, Eli, Thomas, Fletcher, the Detroit kid and King, there are too many misses for our paper-thin program to sustain.
6 misses in the lower ranks and you get what we currently see. The Booker, Johnson and Scott show with no help.
Considering Hopkins' somewhat ballyhooed recruitment, being microscopically better is just not enough. Coupled with the aggregate problems amongst Talton, Eli, Thomas, Fletcher, the Detroit kid and King, there are too many misses for our paper-thin program to sustain.
6 misses in the lower ranks and you get what we currently see. The Booker, Johnson and Scott show with no help.
Yr | G | %Min | ORtg | %Poss | %Shots | eFG% | TS% | OR% | DR% | ARate | TORate | Blk% | Stl% | FC/40 | FD/40 | FTRate | FT% | 2Pt% | 3Pt% | |
2015 | So | 11 | 49.2 | 88.4 | 18.0 | 16.3 | 55.1 | 54.3 | 1.6 | 11.6 | 14.3 | 31.0 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 34.7 | 47.1% | 56.2% | 35.3% |
2014 | Fr | 35 | 45.1 | 91.1 | 17.4 | 18.6 | 45.2 | 46.2 | 4.3 | 11.6 | 11.7 | 20.5 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 2.9 | 33.1 | 50.0% | 44.2% | 31.0% |
% Change | 9.1% | -3.0% | 3.4% | -12.4% | 21.9% | 17.5% | -62.8% | 0.0% | 22.2% | 51.2% | 100.0% | -24.0% | -4.2% | 3.4% | 4.8% | -5.8% | 27.1% | 13.9% |
Year | FGA | TS% | eFG% | % shots at rim | FG% at rim | %assisted at rim | % shots 2pt J | FG% 2pt Jumpers | %of shots 3pt | 3FG% | %assisted 3s | FTA/FGA | FT% |
2015 | 49 | 54.3% | 55.1% | 44.9% | 72.7% | 43.8% | 20.4% | 20.0% | 34.7% | 35.3% | 83.3% | 34.7% | 47.1% |
2014 | 157 | 46.2% | 45.2% | 35.7% | 53.6% | 63.3% | 19.1% | 26.7% | 45.2% | 31.0% | 95.5% | 33.1% | 50.0% |
% Change | 17.5% | 21.9% | 25.8% | 35.6% | -30.8% | 6.8% | -25.1% | -23.2% | 13.9% | -12.8% | 4.8% | -5.8% |
Yr G %Min ORtg %Poss %Shots eFG% TS% OR% DR% ARate TORate Blk% Stl% FC/40 FD/40 FTRate FT% 2Pt% 3Pt% 2015 So 11 49.2 88.4 18.0 16.3 55.1 54.3 1.6 11.6 14.3 31.0 1.0 1.9 4.6 3.0 34.7 47.1% 56.2% 35.3% 2014 Fr 35 45.1 91.1 17.4 18.6 45.2 46.2 4.3 11.6 11.7 20.5 0.5 2.5 4.8 2.9 33.1 50.0% 44.2% 31.0% % Change 9.1% -3.0% 3.4% -12.4% 21.9% 17.5% -62.8% 0.0% 22.2% 51.2% 100.0% -24.0% -4.2% 3.4% 4.8% -5.8% 27.1% 13.9%
Year FGA TS% eFG% % shots at rim FG% at rim %assisted at rim % shots 2pt J FG% 2pt Jumpers %of shots 3pt 3FG% %assisted 3s FTA/FGA FT% 2015 49 54.3% 55.1% 44.9% 72.7% 43.8% 20.4% 20.0% 34.7% 35.3% 83.3% 34.7% 47.1% 2014 157 46.2% 45.2% 35.7% 53.6% 63.3% 19.1% 26.7% 45.2% 31.0% 95.5% 33.1% 50.0% % Change
17.5% 21.9% 25.8% 35.6% -30.8% 6.8% -25.1% -23.2% 13.9% -12.8% 4.8% -5.8%
Seems like he's improved since last year in the majority of categories
His offensive rating is down slightly largely because his FT% is down, but his 2pt% and 3pt% are both up, along with his effective FG% and true shooting% being up. If you really want to call a player out for lack of improvement, then start talking about Talton. Hopkins and Dustin have improved, even if it wasn't as big of a jump as we saw with Burks and Spencer.Jesus. This is hard. His Offensive Rating, which seems to be the aggregate statistic, is down. Even if improved, it's not nearly enough given what Colorado, or any program, needs at this point in his or the other 6 relative misses' careers. You are splicing hairs and failing to see the forest from the trees. I am done with this conversation.
His offensive rating is down slightly largely because his FT% is down, but his 2pt% and 3pt% are both up, along with his effective FG% and true shooting% being up. If you really want to call a player out for lack of improvement, then start talking about Talton. Hopkins and Dustin have improved, even if it wasn't as big of a jump as we saw with Burks and Spencer.
His offensive rating is down slightly largely because his FT% is down, but his 2pt% and 3pt% are both up, along with his effective FG% and true shooting% being up. If you really want to call a player out for lack of improvement, then start talking about Talton. Hopkins and Dustin have improved, even if it wasn't as big of a jump as we saw with Burks and Spencer.
So do you admit that Hopkins has improved since last year? If not your argument is all over the place. I'm not denying his TOrate has increased, but overall he has improved.Don't forget that he turns the ball a lot. It taxes Booker because he's the only competant guard in the back court.
And yes, I called them all out. It's plain as day that this team is a below .500 in the Pac12 and the underclassmen +Talton/Stalzer are the problem areas.
So do you admit that Hopkins has improved since last year? If not your argument is all over the place. I'm not denying his TOrate has increased, but overall he has improved.
If he's our best chance, then I don't see it. His play last year was the least desirable out of the four. Which begs the question, is Tad ruthless enough to succeed at the high ranks of college basketball? Letting kids eat scholarships long past any their shelf life does not breed success ... attrition is a very valuable tool.
Great guys, decent tools, but if Stalzer and King cannot put Colorado to the next level, then you have to reload those scholarships. Just saying.