Deleted member 807
Guest
Reading comprehension around here is piss poor.
Delicious. I like it when you are self deprecating.
Reading comprehension around here is piss poor.
You're making a big assumption that the rest of the team is upset about this decision - I'm not sure that was necessarily the case, but regardless I'll assume you view every contract holdout and transfer with the same disdain.
"We". Love it. Keep up the good work, Skid!Way to grasp at straws. Tell me more about the slave trade.
To be clear, I have never challenged the right that CM has to make decisions for himself to be as selfish as he needs to be.
It's disingenuous of you to claim otherwise.
I'm equal opportunity. It's a selfish choice for any college player to bail on their Bowl team because of their NFL draft stock.
We think you would be wise to drop your fictional narrative about this being isolated to McCaffrey.
I'd appreciate an initiative from the NCAA and AD's to develop boilerplate coaching contract language that restricts and penalizes coach movement that takes place prior to the team's post-season game(s).
I'd much rather loose a coach after the bowl game.
I'm curious what impact the proposed changes to the recruiting calendar will have on the timing of coaches moving to new programs if we start seeing most players signing during the 2 early periods (late June & mid December).
I'm not sure.
The different set of rules for transfer that coaches and players have is one of the nastier sides of college football.
My gut tells me that more consistency between the coaching carousel and the recruitment calendar would be more palatable.
It's pretty crummy for a player that has been recruited by coach Clark, for example, to now be in the position to choose between the Ducks and the Buffs.
That's the way it's always been, I guess.
Pressure is on the Buffs to get those vacancies fast and with coaches who have relationships with quality recruits equal or better than what we've lost.
Straw man arguments are abundant in this thread.
He did what was best for him. I don't like it as a fan of the college game (not an NFL fan), but it was his choice. We will see more of this in the future. Bowl games are going to become more meaningless in the future, unless it's a top tier bowl like the Rose or CFB playoffs. I think universities or th NCAA should carry draft insurance to mitigate this going forward.
People do have short memories. People excuse Von Miller if they are a Broncos fan, but I'll never forget him putting up an icon of his horse collar of speedy on twitter. I can hold my own grudge. Some can with McCaffery, but he'll be embraced by whatever team drafts him.
After seeing what almost just happened to Adoree Jackson (apparently an ankle injury, not a knee) ... seems like maybe CM made the right choice.
Does C Mac playing in El Paso suddenly make that statement untrue?For those of you who see bowl games as optional, why are you comfortable with the NFL having such a large farm program without risk or expense?
Does C Mac playing in El Paso suddenly make that statement untrue?
No. But I think the two issues are related. The pinnacle of college play is to reach and win a bowl game (preferably one of the big bowl games). I don't think that the goal of playing sports for a college should be to reach professional sports.