J-R-K
Well-Known Member
Your picking and choosing points from your own arguments now, that should tell you how poor of a post it was.
Even though Hansen signed in 2012 he played a year at Northwest college so eligibility wise he's in Ski/Dinwiddie's class he was highschool class of 2011. That means he is a year older and more developed than any of the three you keep bringing up, so the question if you want to keep harping on Hansen should be: can Jenkins or Talton as juniors average 17ppg against the 265th worst schedule in the country as their team's primary offensive option is a **** conference? Yeah they could.
As for Stalzer - even if he was a hero he'd never average 17ppg on any team it was not then and will not ever be his game. Did Boyle probably miss on this scholly by your definition? certainly. But if you think a guy like Hansen (a marginal athlete who is a gunner, not quick enough to be a guard in our conference, too short to be a forward, and too slow to be either - and with a usage rate that would take shots away from guys like Scott/Dinwiddie/Booker/XJ) would over the course of his career be of more value to the team than a role playing PG who can step in? then i dont know what to tell you. Hansen might modify his game with stars around him but as it is right now with his usage rate, his turnover rate that makes "bad" Booker look good he'd actually detract from this team as opposed to contributing very little.
If Talton transferred to a mid-major next year he wouldn't score at or close to 17 ppg (he's at 4 ppg this year). That's hardly a reach on my part to claim. And a guy who scores 17 ppg is less valuable then a below average PG and arguably would detract from our team??? :lol: Its not even worth arguing about this if you're going to be so unreasonable.