Going to need a great Tuesday practice.
Some issues though are or should be fixable. We had some badly blown coverages. The first TD had Abrams alone on two receivers, he tried to call for help and nobody adjusted. We either should have had someone fill immediately or called a time out
Friday night we didn't have to call a single time-out due to confusion
Agreed. Especially on the defensive line. They were slow and weak and didnt seem to have any pass rushing moves other than running straight into the offensive line then getting pushed backwards... thats not an issue you can brush off with "they were thinking too much" or "it was the first game"What concerns me about the defense is the talent deficit, which the new staff does not really seem to be correcting.
Late in the game, they ran some stunts out of the four front. The JVD strip was off a stunt and blitz. I suspect we will see more Saturday.Agreed. Especially on the defensive line. They were slow and weak and didnt seem to have any pass rushing moves other than running straight into the offensive line then getting pushed backwards... thats not an issue you can brush off with "they were thinking too much" or "it was the first game"
It'll be Summers or Brumbaugh.to which coach should get fired before the season is over. It takes real "chops" to turn a mediocre defense with some talent into a defense that is reminiscent of Embree-vs-Fresno St -level-of-incompetence.
Coach Tucker said-- we thought in jest-- that he didn't want to make Luckett worse after switching to DB. Apparently, HCMT wasn't joking. Almost to a man, the defense was worse than last year.
The argument that this is a new coaching staff with a new scheme does not obviate Summer's responsibility to adequately diagnose, evaluate, prepare, and strategize with the current roster.
The fact that the LB coach said this week that the LB's needed at least a few more weeks to understand the defense was not understatement or coach speak. He must have anticipated the impending disaster.
For the moment, let's put aside the missed assignments and wrong alignments (such as one DB covering two WR's). I can understand that happening once in a first game. I cannot understand that happening almost every series until the fourth quarter.
It's obviously a poor scheme and personnel decisions to have ILBs like Van Diest and Landman attempting to cover RB's in space.
It's equally bad to play a soft zone coverage (with DB's 12 yards from the line of scrimmage) on third and five--especially when the opponents have been playing pitch and catch for an entire half.
At what point does a veteran DC say (after not forcing a single punt for 3 quarters) that we are going to abandon some complicated 77 cut scheme, and just play man against a less athletic and less talented team?
From what I saw, the defense didn't improve until well into the fourth quarter when CSU became one-dimensional from score pressure.
How in the world is CU going to be able to stop a skilled team with multiple threats beyond a single WR and RB and one-dimensional QB?
I fear Barnett is right that the failure in scheme and coaching cannot be fixed in a week or two. And if that's the case, this is looking like a 3 win season despite NFL talent at a number of spots.
Moreover, I think trading Drake for Brumbaugh was a significant and inexplicable downgrade in both coaching and recruiting. I hope Tucker doesn't wait two years to make coaching changes. I think there is enough evidence now to say Summers isn't the answer (or is the answer to which coach needs to be fired)
It would have been a better. saner, decision to take last year's defense and build on it, rather than start from scratch--with the same personnel. I don't see Summers recovering to make this even a mediocre defense. I hope I'm wrong.
After an objective argument has been made, let the personal attacks begin:
It is a contradiction and one that needs to be dealt with.I agree with most of your post, but these two things you mentioned sure seem like a stark contradiction.
I agree that the D needs to get better, and I think they will.
After the game a few players talked about CSU doing some things we didnt expect. Adjustments to that was made at the half and we got better.
The nubs only scored 2 touchdowns on offense, only had 276 yards on total offense and turned the ball over 3 times against South Alabama.
The nubs were beat in every category except turnovers.
The nubs are overrated just as we knew they were and we will kick their ass this weekend.
Yes. Let's hope CSU's offense is just really good this year combined with game one communication and fundamental issues on CU's part.Defense was still struggling a lot in second half. Main difference was turnovers. But csu missed a WIDE open long touchdown pass on one drive. On another drive they were at the edge of the redzone and had to settle for a field goal because the center snapped ball 20 yards over the quarterbacks head on second down.
On the sack fumble, that wasnt so much a good play by the buffs as it was a terrible play by the runningback for straight up not blocking the guy that he was supposed to. CSU was still moving the ball at will the entire second half when they werent shooting themselves in the foot
I was also puzzled by the 2 ILBs staying in for nickel (all but dime in fact). I expected to see the Taylor in most of our plays, and in fact, he played sparingly. I also agree with Wells assessment. He took some poor angles early in the game.
Nubs have a true frosh RB/WR who they utilize just like CSU utilized #21. Very quick and tough to get a piece of in the open field. We will need to better utilize angles, the sideline etc to get him bottled up.
Bobo isn't a great coach but he has been around for a long time and knows how to take advantage of a defense in it's first game in a new system with a new coach.Yes. Let's hope CSU's offense is just really good this year combined with game one communication and fundamental issues on CU's part.
It should be out now BreadI tried looking but is there a full game log of snaps played and such that typically comes out from the CU SID?
Where do I find it? I've never been able to find it well on my own, I'm an idot.It should be out now Bread
Look at the youth on this team, the D has a total of something like 52 games started. I was suprised at how well the D line played, I thought when they would rotate a freshman in they would do it one at a time. Nope and the second unit much better than I could have dreamed. Are they Utah good, no not close yet. I to had some questions about the staff like most did, Friday answered a lot of questions and most were positive answers. I think you may end up being more pleased where this D ends up by the end of the year. If the team was mostly a jr and sr team I would agree with you, let them grow up on the field at least a few games before bailing on themI haven't been able to rewatch the game so I may have missed some things, but..
On the OP's main question about Summers, we don't know yet. He has a solid pedigree so I think more than 1 game is needed to fully form an opinion.
That said, the defense was pretty garbage, saved only by their ability to cause turnovers. Causing turnovers is the great equalizer so if they're able to do this with consistency, that's a really good thing. If they just got lucky, we could be in for a long season. They looked confused, out of position, slow to react, and couldn't tackle well to make up for it. Very little pass rush from what should be a decent DL and OLBs.
There were several questionable hires in my mind on this defense so it'll be interesting to see how it plays out. Bumbro seems straight up bad so far, I was holding out to see what he offered coaching wise and one game in and I'm definitely not sold. Please stop letting him fly to Mississippi on recruiting trips. LBs just looked awful, but we know Landman is a good player so I'm putting that on the coaches and/or scheme. That being said, coaches don't get juked out of their shoes and miss tackles so LBs need to play better. Tillman was a projection hire and seems to be a zero on the recruiting front so far, so he better bring it in the corner department. Kind of a tough spot for him because I don't know he has a lot to work with. Safeties actually looked surprisingly good so kudos to MT/Summers for having them ready and causing turnovers.
Look at the youth on this team, the D has a total of something like 52 games started. I was suprised at how well the D line played, I thought when they would rotate a freshman in they would do it one at a time. Nope and the second unit much better than I could have dreamed. Are they Utah good, no not close yet. I to had some questions about the staff like most did, Friday answered a lot of questions and most were positive answers. I think you may end up being more pleased where this D ends up by the end of the year. If the team was mostly a jr and sr team I would agree with you, let them grow up on the field at least a few games before bailing on them
@Big Jim and I had the same reaction: read the first paragraph, decide anyone who leads with that level of hyperbole is an idot whoYou guys read all that?
Kudos, I guess.
Didn't start till the previous game had endedWhere do I find it? I've never been able to find it well on my own, I'm an idot.
Didn't start till the previous game had ended