buffsyko
Club Member
62-20-2 is not a rivalry. The game in Denver has become stale and interest is evaporating ...
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Congrats Buff Fans
- Thread starter CsquaredCC
- Start date
62-20-2 is not a rivalry. The game in Denver has become stale and interest is evaporating ...
I'd like to know how ticket sales impact the payout to each school. I don't know the details, but surely the stated payouts are based on selling most/all of the tickets? If not, who is subsidising the 20,000 unsold tickets? If the contract for this fiasco doesn't include a cancellation clause based on (lack of) attendance, then CU needs a new legal staff.
buffsyko
Club Member
Go back to ramnation with the rest of your delusional fans. Thomas is over-hyped and I wish this series would go away. Your fans are more obnoxious than husker fans.
buffsyko
Club Member
Why should CU stoop to a NON bcs school ?????
JimmyBuff
Well-Known Member
It would be interesting to know. I'm guessing corporate partners are.
The Guest
Guest
Jesus people--notably Jimmy and CC--don't you remember this debate from a few years ago.
The general outline (and I'm sorry Jimmy, I'm going on memory here, not google, but it was a subject nearly every day in the BDC).
--Most CU fans wanted to abandon the series. And if it had to happen, we wanted it either on campus, or alternating between Folsom and Denver.
--CSU fans called us chicken****. They also talked up the big venue being good for the state and how awesome the game is at Denver.
--Bohn tried to get out of the contract, but political pressure was applied. He later admitted that there were hard feelings between CU and CSU's athletic department at the time because of this deal.
--I don't remember the numbers specifically, but I think CU was projected to make a half-million more every other year (away game year) if it was in Denver (non-factor if we alternated between Folsom and Denver), but CSU stood to make a lot more money in this arrangement.
--As CU fans we kept referring to this as "charity" because that extra half-million was because CSU has a ****** stadium, we didn't want to play the game anyway, and we never wanted to play it in Denver--especially on home years.
How can you people not remember all of this? It consumed us as a fanbase for quite some time.
And CC...really? You want to play this on campus? Jesus Christ, that's all that CU fans ever wanted. It was CSU whininess and a myopic political entity (governor or state legistature...I don't remember which) that really forced this hand. As a person you're entitled to an opinion, but as a CSU fan you DO NOT get to complain about the venue.
The general outline (and I'm sorry Jimmy, I'm going on memory here, not google, but it was a subject nearly every day in the BDC).
--Most CU fans wanted to abandon the series. And if it had to happen, we wanted it either on campus, or alternating between Folsom and Denver.
--CSU fans called us chicken****. They also talked up the big venue being good for the state and how awesome the game is at Denver.
--Bohn tried to get out of the contract, but political pressure was applied. He later admitted that there were hard feelings between CU and CSU's athletic department at the time because of this deal.
--I don't remember the numbers specifically, but I think CU was projected to make a half-million more every other year (away game year) if it was in Denver (non-factor if we alternated between Folsom and Denver), but CSU stood to make a lot more money in this arrangement.
--As CU fans we kept referring to this as "charity" because that extra half-million was because CSU has a ****** stadium, we didn't want to play the game anyway, and we never wanted to play it in Denver--especially on home years.
How can you people not remember all of this? It consumed us as a fanbase for quite some time.
And CC...really? You want to play this on campus? Jesus Christ, that's all that CU fans ever wanted. It was CSU whininess and a myopic political entity (governor or state legistature...I don't remember which) that really forced this hand. As a person you're entitled to an opinion, but as a CSU fan you DO NOT get to complain about the venue.