Other than the stadium the only possibility is that Eustacy (sp) got a hold of some beer and co-eds again and Graham tried to keep it under the table (in a manner of speaking.)
please refer to my previous comment, failing on the stadium goals isnt a logically fire-able offense.
I have a 12 pack that says CSU will announce within the next year that they're not moving forward with the stadium plan. They had to fire Graham in order to kill the stadium. He wouldn't ever let the deal die.
No info, but they could also be trying to get out in front of a COI action that hasn't been reported yet.
JG has been rumored to be in the "whatever it takes to win" category, legal or not.
That is the thing you dont have to fire a highly successful guy like Graham if you arent going to follow his plan he shows himself the door. If you are Dr. frank you simply say we have decided to go in a different direction we need you to back it and things take care of them-self, it also doesnt happen quickly like this. With a guy like Bohn you have to fire him because he's not a visionary he's a manager who takes kick in the nuts after kick in the nuts and stays.
Something else is up.
The stadium maybe dead but at CSU not getting a new on campus stadium built in a hostile town is not a friable offense not when you are winning and and on the upswing. Hell I dont know that RG could get Folsom built today, but if you brought him in to do it and changed tack, he'd simply leave.
Why would Graham quit on his own? His ego wouldn't allow that.
We'll have to agree to disagree the successful high functioning people i know don't hang on like that.
ramnation right now
if they were doing this in anticipation of ncaa action, they wouldn't have spun it this way. they will look dishonest when the next shoe drops and i don't think they'd make that mistake.
they could be covering up something untoward, but perhaps not an ncaa violation.
We'll have to agree to disagree the successful high functioning people i know don't hang on like that.
This was what I thought too. No reason to fire him today unless a big donor (Pat Stryker never seemed to get along with JG) called Frank and demanded the action (or he engaged in some act of moral turpitude, such as sexual harassment). Shocking, really. Isn't JG one of the big donors anyway? This move tells me that expectations will be scaled back.Maybe a big donor doesn't like Graham?
Maybe a big donor doesn't like Graham?
This could be a good decision for the Rams. The guy did make good hires, but had no experience as an AD. He was probably running amok up there.
Could also be a sign that CSU is getting more serious about being included in the P5 after the recent news?
Maybe a big donor doesn't like Graham?
This could be a good decision for the Rams. The guy did make good hires, but had no experience as an AD. He was probably running amok up there.
Could also be a sign that CSU is getting more serious about being included in the P5 after the recent news?
I'd like to point out the nice shrubbery!Render of CSU's new on campus stadium
There was no one more serious about positioning CSU for the changing college athletics landscape than Jack Graham. No one.
I really think that it's probably Graham behaving in a way that doesn't align with a non-profit public university. That environment is diametrically opposed culturally to how an entrepreneurial CEO relates to the world. Benson has struggled with this, but with him we had someone who was more of a politician than businessperson by the time he entered university life so it worked out ok. Different role, too. Benson's at the top of the food chain as president. I'm not sure he could deal with reporting to one or more academicians.
Did you even read what you just wrote? CSU has been doing EVERYTHING to position themselves for P5, by letting a big donor run the show. Then reality hit. They were spending money hand over fist that they don't have.
You left out shenanigans.smells of misconduct, malfeasance, gross negligence, etc.
if the sheep are lucky, he was merely banging a student or a goat or something and this is not financial or academic related.