Yeesh, MW is really struggling here.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
CU 11 point Underdogs at Cal...
- Thread starter DiggerBuffs
- Start date
I imagine any team who loses their senior starting QB will struggle
I think most people place more emphasis on what has happened in the last 5, 10, 15 years.
Maybe we can make the definition more specific. Since then end of the McCartney golden era (17 years and counting) CU has generally been a bottom feeder, and especially in the last 8 to 10 years.
Last edited:
Do facts and numbers confuse you?
UCLA lost their starter against Texas and won.
Aaaand point missed. Go away, troll.
BUFFSROCKS
Well-Known Member
You can skew the number of years you want to look back at...or how many years people put an emphasis on to prove you point. I'll skew how long I look back as well...and it's about 5 minutes to realize you're an idiot.
Resorting to name calling is a good indicator that you don't know what you're talking about.
Here is my point, in a post above I was talking about the difficulties of getting out of the cellar. Bottom dwellers tend to stay on the bottom. It's a viscous cycle. I was using a few other teams that have turned it around and noting that in many cases these teams had someone special at the QB position. You, or someone else, claimed that CU is not a "bottom feeder". I acknowledged that CU, unlike other teams, has not always been bad, but 2001 and the early-mid 90s are a long time ago, ancient history in terms of perceived relevance in the world of college football.
What exactly are you contesting? Are you saying that CU is not a bottom dweller? The last time CU was good was a long time ago, freaking ancient history to most fans.
Both statements are correct: CU's all time record puts them in the top 25, but in the 17 or so years since the golden era of McCartney CU has been, for the most part, and certainly in aggregate, near the bottom.
Even after he said "Here's my point..." I still have no idea what he's trying to say. Something about bottom feeders, I guess.
I am still trying to figure out why a troll would chose Mark Wetmore as his handle?
He likes running his mouth