Because So Cal is the path to winning the Pac-12 South. Looking at Clemson recruiting is not particularly useful.
Going away from the core footprint just seems like spreading resources out for not a lot of payoff.
I'll volunteer. I will be cheap so they can buy out Eliot. The gameplan can be made in Barzil, so everyone will be happy.Hopefully HCMM has another Leavitt attending his church we can get
Eliot is a hard one, he inherited a bad situation, but I know he was a UK castoff.
Youre missing my point. Its the model-yes California and Texas need to be core to what we do, but we also need to think out of the box and widen things. Why not go into NOLA for talent if we can find a point assistant there?
Two things-One, half this staff has a Mountain West/WAC background still. Every offensive assistant other than Chiaverini came with MM five years ago. Enough of that. That conference is garbage. There should be enough power five openings (the secondary market hasn't even started yet) to where we can find quality replacements. Two, we need guys who can recruit. I don't care where they've got connections. If I see Darrin Chiaverini listed as the primary recruiter on give or take half our current commitments, thats a HUGE problem.
I prefer P5 guys as well, but that isn't always going to be the case. My point was, if we are deciding between a guy from Army who recruits wherever Brown recruited vs a guy working at SDSU, get the SDSU guy. If we're deciding between a UCLA castoff or a Purdue castoff, get the UCLA castoff. (not a dig on Brown or Els really, they're alright hires, but they haven't exactly rolled in and lit the recruiting world on fire). Given the turnover in the P12 this year, I'm all for raiding the UCLA/ASU/OSU staffs. But it's a mistake to simply discount MWC guys simply because Mac's guys have been meh.
I'm not opposed to NOLA recruiting, although Embree sent EB the legend in there and we didn't get ****, but it should be an extension of Houston recruiting. So basically group that in with TX recruiting. I'm just not down with hiring people with southeast connections or northeast or midwest or wherever, I don't give a **** what Clemson is recruiting. They can walk into any living room in the country and get guys. We can't.
Nussmeier is awful.
Apparently everyone gets to stay
And our current play caller is not?
Source?
Speculation, or you heard something?Apparently everyone gets to stay
Bash Lindgren all you want. I am fine with replacing him.
But have you watched Florida lately? They have been significantly worse than us on offense. Nussmeier would be such a bad choice. All for throwing out names, but let's at least throw out decent choices.
Didnt every FL qb get hurt this season though?Bash Lindgren all you want. I am fine with replacing him.
But have you watched Florida lately? They have been significantly worse than us on offense. Nussmeier would be such a bad choice. All for throwing out names, but let's at least throw out decent choices.
Didnt every FL qb get hurt this season though?
The lack of any news out of CU is weird. Thought we would be in the mix for some new blood. There are a couple that could be let go and it certainly wouldn’t hurt our recruiting!
It's only weird if you actually expect CU to perform like their peers....The lack of any news out of CU is weird. Thought we would be in the mix for some new blood. There are a couple that could be let go and it certainly wouldn’t hurt our recruiting!
You guys seem to forget we technically don’t have an AC opening here.
I get it. My (possibly UBL) point is that MM doesn’t feel the need to go hire any new coaches when there aren’t any openings on the staff. All these other schools are hiring to replace guys.Oh, I don't think that's being forgotten. I think that's actually the point...
I get it. My (possibly UBL) point is that MM doesn’t feel the need to go hire any new coaches when there aren’t any openings on the staff. All these other schools are hiring to replace guys.