I will say that I had an employee who had an English Bullldog (Like Uga). That thing was the most miserable dog I have ever seen. It couldn’t breathe, it had all kinds of joint problems, inconsistent, etc.No, it isn't.
Some breeds make you say “What”? Just bad ideas.I will say that I had an employee who had an English Bullldog (Like Uga). That thing was the most miserable dog I have ever seen. It couldn’t breathe, it had all kinds of joint problems, inconsistent, etc.
It was really sad.
Yes, it is. "Mini" pigs are a set of pig breeds with a genetic makeup that lends them towards being smaller, much akin to the artificial selection that has driven the creation of dog breeds to a much lesser degree. Given There's variability in their size, and some assholes do restrict their diets, but given normal diets their genetics still lend them towards being smaller. That is not "a genetic mutation," it's a suite of genetic changes that pushes their morphology, on average, in one direction, same as the suite of changes that accounts for dog breeds (or almost any natural speciation) if caught at an early stage in the process.No, it isn't.
Says you, Mr Fancy Pants Scientist!Yes, it is. "Mini" pigs are a set of pig breeds with a genetic makeup that lends them towards being smaller, much akin to the artificial selection that has driven the creation of dog breeds to a much lesser degree. Given There's variability in their size, and some assholes do restrict their diets, but given normal diets their genetics still lend them towards being smaller. That is not "a genetic mutation," it's a suite of genetic changes that pushes their morphology, on average, in one direction, same as the suite of changes that accounts for dog breeds (or almost any natural speciation) if caught at an early stage in the process.
I am also in favor of genetically engineered mini bison. A herd of them, in fact.
Good grief. That program and AD is in some trouble. Makes more sense why they absolutely have to move to the BIG just to save their athletic departmentAt the risk of derailing the absolutely fascinating mini-pig discussion, the New York Times as an interesting deep dive into UCLA’s finances. Bottom line, their stadium football revenue ain’t cutting it, and it doesn’t look to change. They give away an astounding number of free tickets to almost every game. Their Under Armor deal was a shambles, and although they got a nice settlement, they aren’t getting the revenue they counted on. Only thing missing is s B1G deep dive
Link to article
I just think LA is a ****ty market. The fans are front runners. They have a history of not supporting their teams. I think their shiny new stadium is more of an attraction than the Rams.Good grief. That program and AD is in some trouble. Makes more sense why they absolutely have to move to the BIG just to save their athletic department
USC has a massive fan base but UCLA has always been fairly small in the shadow of USC. They are 100% being propped up by their location and nothing else. They'll be on Indiana level when they move to the BIG and just be happy to be collecting a checkI just think LA is a ****ty market. The fans are front runners. They have a history of not supporting their teams. I think their shiny new stadium is more of an attraction than the Rams.
If the money difference isn't overwhelming, there's a great argument to be made that separating gives them a unique opportunity to get out of the shadow and win fans/recruiting in LA.USC has a massive fan base but UCLA has always been fairly small in the shadow of USC. They are 100% being propped up by their location and nothing else. They'll be on Indiana level when they move to the BIG and just be happy to be collecting a check
Possibly, but they've always been apathetic to football.If the money difference isn't overwhelming, there's a great argument to be made that separating gives them a unique opportunity to get out of the shadow and win fans/recruiting in LA.
Plus a bunch of libtards live there.I just think LA is a ****ty market. The fans are front runners. They have a history of not supporting their teams. I think their shiny new stadium is more of an attraction than the Rams.
If the money difference isn't overwhelming, there's a great argument to be made that separating gives them a unique opportunity to get out of the shadow and win fans/recruiting in LA.
Why the **** would UCLA stay in this disaster of a conference?It is possible that the folks in the pac are already aware that ucla is going to be held and that they have assurances from the others that they aren’t going to bolt in replacement of ucla to the big. That would in some way explain the premature sdsu leak.
only add one. and Stanford has a far better chance at sometimes being relevant in the pac than joining the big. Just spitballing…
It's not their choice.Why the **** would UCLA stay in this disaster of a conference?
Its not happening. I'm amazed how many of you think it is.
That is so cool. Engaging young students in research is so valuable. Especially in the engineering and sciences.Apparently Thomas Cech (Nobel Laureate) dropped into my daughter's o-chem class a couple of weeks ago to talk about his research. As a freshman, she said that was super cool. So there are still some smart people hanging around campus.
They'll probably have to subsidize Cal to some extent, but that'll be it. The idea they are is wishful thinking.It's not their choice.
With that said, I do not think the UC Regents will block the move.
Bang on assessment. Add that CU also has excellent associations with government science agencies (NOAA, NIST, NCAR, NASA).Non Mtn version: CU has a world class faculty and research program with a mediocre student body.
you are assuming they get to decide. the uc-regents have made it pretty clear especially governor newsome that they hate this move and have the authority to block it. the issue isn't whether they can (already reviewed by their lawyers and concluded they have the power). the issue is and always has been whether the cal regents will actually do so.Why the **** would UCLA stay in this disaster of a conference?
Its not happening. I'm amazed how many of you think it is.
It won't be blocked. If they do anything, they'll have UCLA give Cal a little bit of that Big 10 TV money. That's it.you are assuming they get to decide. the uc-regents have made it pretty clear especially governor newsome that they hate this move and have the authority to block it. the issue isn't whether they can (already reviewed by their lawyers and concluded they have the power). the issue is and always has been whether the cal regents will actually do so.
some folks are certain that they will not block. i doubt they will block but it is not a sure thing yet.
That last line doesn't bode well for allbuffsIt won't be blocked. If they do anything, they'll have UCLA give Cal a little bit of that Big 10 TV money. That's it.
We're wasting our time talking about this.
It won't be blocked. If they do anything, they'll have UCLA give Cal a little bit of that Big 10 TV money. That's it.
We're wasting our time talking about this.
Wilner's a clown.Don't tell Wilner that, you'll ruin all his fun
The Rose Bowl is a fun experience for opposing fans. I’d imagine it’s pretty lame for UCLA fans. Great, historic venue that is more than half empty during UCLA home games.Plus a bunch of libtards live there.
The Rose Bowl delivers a terrible game day experience for fans. It was a massive mistake not to build a stadium on campus when they had the chance in the 60s.