That is my concern. I find it tedious to flip between app and regular network. That works both ways, so there's some benefit to the app if people start there but I would expect that on balance it will work against ratings.If I get locked in on a couple of linear games working my last and Xfinity c buttons in te mud-afternoon wonder, I just can’t image making the effort to get over to Apple to check in on Oregon State vs ASU.
It is a tough position no doubt. Years of mismanagement that ultimately lost you the LA market and at a time when corporations are trimming spending. Not a good series of events.Kliavkoff to the Pac-12 presidents:
I bet the CU at TCU opener is one of the top 5 most viewed regular season broadcasts with a Big 12 team next season.It is a tough position no doubt. Years of mismanagement that ultimately lost you the LA market and at a time when corporations are trimming spending. Not a good series of events.
Fox is all in on the BIG and ESPN is SEC. I think we all know where this is going and CU needs to position themselves for the next round. I am not convinced that is the Big 12 and think that is a short sighted move.
If Apple is offering you better financial terms and has a plan for exposure you take it. Apple wants to succeed and has every incentive to promote and make the partnership successful. ESPN does not as we are one late night game and ESPNU/ESPN+ filler content to them. We will never be a featured product.
I have DIRECTV stream for live sports and can easily switch between apps. Works like a dream. No clumsy input management. It’s great. Once you get a clean app set up there’s no turning back imo.That is my concern. I find it tedious to flip between app and regular network. That works both ways, so there's some benefit to the app if people start there but I would expect that on balance it will work against ratings.
All that said, I've been told that I'm old and a smart tv neophyte. That flipping among different apps isn't a big deal. I'm skeptical, though, because usually ease-of-use is king when it comes to broad acceptance of technology.
Yes. Open to leaning how to manage all this better on a remote.That is my concern. I find it tedious to flip between app and regular network. That works both ways, so there's some benefit to the app if people start there but I would expect that on balance it will work against ratings.
All that said, I've been told that I'm old and a smart tv neophyte. That flipping among different apps isn't a big deal. I'm skeptical, though, because usually ease-of-use is king when it comes to broad acceptance of technology.
Mulitple TV'sYes. Open to leaning how to manage all this better on a remote.
What Apple should do is buy exclusive rights to the Pac 12 and have a subscription OPTION to for an NFL Red Zone type of set up. With 12 teams (assuming SMU and SDSU are added), 3 games in the early window going on simultaneously, 2 games the afternoon window and the premier game of the week in the prime time window. Basic access to Apple TV gets you whatever game you want with commercials, but the Red Zone option for $100/season gets you commercial free coverage of all the games like NFLRZ.
Best guess? Indeed, only an educated guess: The Pac-12 will get a deal that pays its schools $25 million annually. The current 12-year Pac-12 deal that expires next year averages $20.8 million. The length of the active deal made former commissioner Larry Scott an easy target as the league got lapped by other conferences.
A $25 million would lag approximately $50 million annually behind the Big Ten. As such, concerns would be raised about whether such a figure would be enough to keep Pac-12 schools from bolting for potential opportunities in the Big Ten and Big 12.
Most of those insights are coming from Washington State's Prez, Kirk Schulz. He's been around a while-but here's the thing with his POV. WSU is either remaining a Pac 12 member (if the conference manages to survive) or heading to the MWC if it doesn't. He's got a bias.Actual News
Pac deal expected by mid-March. Some good, candid insights if you register with your email to be able to read the full article.
Pac-12 media rights: Nobody “spiraling off into places of despair” as process nears resolution, WSU president says
Washington State president Kirk Schulz believes the conference must finalize a new media agreement by the middle of March: “The longer it goes, the more noise there will be.”www.mercurynews.com
The B1G and SEC have already gotten everything they want from the Big 12. That's the main reason for its stability. The only member with a chance of an invite is Kansas.Most of those insights are coming from Washington State's Prez, Kirk Schulz. He's been around a while-but here's the thing with his POV. WSU is either remaining a Pac 12 member (if the conference manages to survive) or heading to the MWC if it doesn't. He's got a bias.
This can't be 100% streaming IMO. If its similar access to ESPN's prime windows as what we've had with Apple taking the place of the Pac 12 network, that probably works. CU as an institution has had a visibility issue. That's why we hired Coach Prime. We went from worst power 5 program to basically being able to pick and choose the transfers/recruits we wanted with that move alone. I'm not going to be happy if CU goes along with a deal that is all streaming-especially if its an Apple-MLS set up where you have to buy the subscription to Apple TV and then turn around and buy all the Pac 12 content.
Another thing with this-this sport is heading for a Power 3 in the context of the playoff. We know FOX and ESPN are all in with their respective super conferences, but I think those two leagues are going to want to be nationwide when all this is done. The Big 12 likely becomes the leftover power league-schools like Okie Lite and TCU wind up there. They dont bring enough to the table to get the B1G or SEC invite, but they're not Washington State or Oregon State.....if that makes sense. The super leagues will take what they want out of the ACC (which then dies) and the Big 12 to make sure they're everywhere nationwide, and then off we go. I don't see the Big 12 being able to lock even the four corners schools in with their GOR because the whole sport knows there's another round of this coming when the ACC's GOR dissolves.
I have DIRECTV stream for live sports and can easily switch between apps. Works like a dream. No clumsy input management. It’s great. Once you get a clean app set up there’s no turning back imo.
Most of those insights are coming from Washington State's Prez, Kirk Schulz. He's been around a while-but here's the thing with his POV. WSU is either remaining a Pac 12 member (if the conference manages to survive) or heading to the MWC if it doesn't. He's got a bias.
This can't be 100% streaming IMO. If its similar access to ESPN's prime windows as what we've had with Apple taking the place of the Pac 12 network, that probably works. CU as an institution has had a visibility issue. That's why we hired Coach Prime. We went from worst power 5 program to basically being able to pick and choose the transfers/recruits we wanted with that move alone. I'm not going to be happy if CU goes along with a deal that is all streaming-especially if its an Apple-MLS set up where you have to buy the subscription to Apple TV and then turn around and buy all the Pac 12 content through a separate subscription.
Another thing with this-this sport is heading for a Power 3 in the context of the playoff. We know FOX and ESPN are all in with their respective super conferences, but I think those two leagues are going to want to be nationwide when all this is done. The Big 12 likely becomes the leftover power league-schools like Okie Lite and TCU wind up there. They dont bring enough to the table to get the B1G or SEC invite, but they're not Washington State or Oregon State.....if that makes sense. The super leagues will take what they want out of the ACC (which then dies) and the Big 12 to make sure they're everywhere nationwide, and then off we go. I don't see the Big 12 being able to lock even the four corners schools in with their GOR because the whole sport knows there's another round of this coming when the ACC's GOR dissolves.
Because...Why is everyone b****ing about hooking up with the most valuable company on the planet?
That Minnesota blogger who claims to be an insider but doesn't have a great track record speculated about Google possibly being involved because of Sunday Ticket. That would be idealspeaking of super rich tech companies with TV goals, has google said anything on expanding into CFB? With them getting NFL sunday ticket, you'd think the more football the merrier
There is a lot going on in this post. And it reads like you were typing drunk. Can you clarify? lolIf I get locked in on a couple of linear games working my last and Xfinity c buttons in te mud-afternoon wonder, I just can’t image making the effort to get over to Apple to check in on Oregon State vs ASU.
I’m watching ESPN and Fox games at 2:30 pm on a November Saturday. Maybe a game on ESPN2 as well. Back and forth. I’m checking scores of other games. All easy tasks on my Xfinity remote.There is a lot going on in this post. And it reads like you were typing drunk. Can you clarify? lol
I’m watching ESPN and Fox games at 2:30 pm on a November Saturday. Maybe a game on ESPN2 as well. Back and forth. I’m checking scores of other games. All easy tasks on my Xfinity remote.
How to flip in and out of Apple streaming game of OSU vs ASU?
Yeah you can. There is section of the app where all of your recordings are stored.Can you record like a DVR on DIRECTV Stream?
There will be another round of moves when the ACC's GoR blows up.
the next round of realignment is likely happening in 2030 (announced in 2027/2028), so unless the ACC votes to dissolve, those programs will be waiting another 8-9 years after that.
I have a thought that Notre Dame ends up destroying the ACC GoR.The ACC is going to be hard to break upeven if ESPN tried to do an ACC to SEC raid. theyd have to take all ACC teams in a merger.
Back in 2016, the ACC and ESPN agreed to a 20-year media rights deal through 2035-36, a deal that brought about the birth of the ACC Network — owned and operated by ESPN — which launched in 2019.
That deal, per Steve Wiseman of The News and Observer, based out of Raleigh, North Carolina, “irrevocably and exclusively grants to the conference during the term all rights necessary for the conference to perform the contractual obligations of the conference expressly set forth in the ESPN agreement.”
In layman's terms, as explained by Wiseman, “any TV revenue a school is due from the ACC’s contract with ESPN is conference property through June 30, 2036, regardless of whether the school remains an ACC member or leaves for another conference.”
Explained further by Wiseman, the ACC’s grant of rights means that were a school to leave the conference for another, “the ACC would get any media revenue generated from athletic events on its campus through summer 2036.”
Which in essence would mean, as ESPN’s Andrea Adelson explained it, “Any departing school would ... forfeit its media rights and the ability to have home games and some non-conference games air on TV. In all sports. Through 2036.”
Throw in exit fees — according to Adelson, those currently stand at $120 million — and that is a lot of money to lose
The ACC’s grant of rights keeps being brought up in conference realignment discussions. Here’s why
The ACC’s grant of rights agreement has become a major talking point when it comes to the future of college football.www.deseret.com
They're going to remain a power league I think if for no other reason than any sort of anti-monopoly type lawsuits go away. ESPN and FOX (who have both inked deals with the Big 12 IIRC) will make sure of it IMO because they're likely defendants in an anti-monopoly suit if one comes The SEC/Big 10 would combine for 8 of the 12 playoff bids, with the Big 12 getting 3, and the G5 that one.The B1G and SEC have already gotten everything they want from the Big 12. That's the main reason for its stability. The only member with a chance of an invite is Kansas.
So, if the SEC and B1G expand to like 24 teams each then it's likely that the leftovers will look at the Big 12 as the best remaining.
But I could see the P12 remainders each forming new conferences by raiding the best options from the MWC, AAC and Sun Belt.
For example, WSU, OSU, ASU, FSU, SDSU, BSU, UN-R, UNLV, USU, CSU, AFA, UNM, UTSA, SMU, Rice and Tulane would be a good 16-team western conference that would warrant a playoff invite. (ASU would likely go Big 12 expansion in this scenario and the new western conference would probably opt for SJSU and its media market.)
Their deal is different. I think it's something like they must go to the ACC if they join a football conference through 2036 while playing all other sports in the ACC + a certain number of FB games each year vs ACC opponents. Meanwhile they have their own separate media deal for FB. I'd assume their terms are different.I have a thought that Notre Dame ends up destroying the ACC GoR.
- they want to go B1G
- Start negotiating with conference
- 8-10 other teams say "no deals, we're in this together"
- ND says "let's take this to court"
Yes, they have a special media deal, but they're locked into the same GoR as the other 15.Their deal is different. I think it's something like they must go to the ACC if they join a football conference through 2036 while playing all other sports in the ACC + a certain number of FB games each year vs ACC opponents. Meanwhile they have their own separate media deal for FB. I'd assume their terms are different.
But the games on their campus aren't part of it. I don't know, but that seems significant enough to make their exit a lot cheaper and less disruptive.Yes, they have a special media deal, but they're locked into the same GoR as the other 15.
My understanding is that the GoR covers all games by member schools needed to fulfill the ESPN contract. The five games per year ND plays ACC teams are part of that. So their GoR liability is 5/8 of the full ACC members.But the games on their campus aren't part of it. I don't know, but that seems significant enough to make their exit a lot cheaper and less disruptive.