Would you feel better in we called it Buc-ee's Conference? The Big12 will take us back whenever we want.
the truck stop 12 is our money gimp.
Would you feel better in we called it Buc-ee's Conference? The Big12 will take us back whenever we want.
Sam Bradshaw did a pretty good breakdown and series of ratings comparisons across college football and a general response/critique to Mandel’s methodology. It incorporates things like channels, timeslots, etc. Also provides a good example of why general averages that disregard channel and time slot are flawed. It doesn’t include data from 2022-2023 since these were put out last summer and fall.The data that I referenced compared apples to apples by network. It did not solve for time slot.
Can I see your data? That would be helpful.
You can call the Big 12 Buc-ee's if you like, but the rest of the country will be calling the PAC irrelevant (assuming the PAC even exists a month or so from now).Would you feel better in we called it Buc-ee's Conference? The Big12 will take us back whenever we want.
please share which of the truck stoppers you represent. i promise to mock your team if we fall into this conference.You can call the Big 12 Buc-ee's if you like, but the rest of the country will be calling the PAC irrelevant (assuming the PAC even exists a month or so from now).
I use to laugh at ISU, KU, KSU years ago, maybe it's a good thing we've been buried in the no longer relative PAC.You can call the Big 12 Buc-ee's if you like, but the rest of the country will be calling the PAC irrelevant (assuming the PAC even exists a month or so from now).
This pope seems pretty judge-y.You can call the Big 12 Buc-ee's if you like, but the rest of the country will be calling the PAC irrelevant (assuming the PAC even exists a month or so from now).
Thanks, appreciate the data. It looks like they are indeed pretty close, which was not at all what the original poster was implying. Using the below as the smoothed summation chart, I still think the PAC has the edge, but I also agree that we are splitting hairs. Also, the four new entrants into the Big 12 would bring the average down, although I realize those schools get less exposure in G5 than they would in a P5 league. They were not included in the below chart. However, it seems that only Cincinnati outdrew Colorado, by a whisker, and both teams have had polar opposite W/L records.Sam Bradshaw did a pretty good breakdown and series of ratings comparisons across college football and a general response/critique to Mandel’s methodology. It incorporates things like channels, timeslots, etc. Also provides a good example of why general averages that disregard channel and time slot are flawed. It doesn’t include data from 2022-2023 since these were put out last summer and fall.
It’s comes in two parts but it is an interesting discussion for those that like numbers and statistics. It is a little lengthy.
The TL;DR summary is the two conferences’ and their leftovers are largely comparable with a lean to the Big 12.
Big 12 vs. PAC numbers and response to Mandel methodology:
Stop The Propaganda: The truth about Big 12 vs. Pac 12 TV numbers
Whenever realignment strikes people tend to throw out television numbers. Truthfully, many claims are not supported by the data.sicem365.com
Discussion as it relates to all college football and individual team rankings:
How Many Viewers Did Your NCAA Team Attract?
We take a look at EVERY FBS team and also compare league by league! Who's the top ten in viewership? How do the ACC schools rank relative to each other? How big a boost does Alabama give the SEC West? It's all inside.sicem365.com
Oh god - we have Baylor fans coming here again and links to Baylor websites.
This is reason enough to stay in the Pac12
LMAOSam Bradshaw did a pretty good breakdown and series of ratings comparisons across college football and a general response/critique to Mandel’s methodology. It incorporates things like channels, timeslots, etc. Also provides a good example of why general averages that disregard channel and time slot are flawed. It doesn’t include data from 2022-2023 since these were put out last summer and fall.
It’s comes in two parts but it is an interesting discussion for those that like numbers and statistics. It is a little lengthy.
The TL;DR summary is the two conferences’ and their leftovers are largely comparable with a lean to the Big 12.
Big 12 vs. PAC numbers and response to Mandel methodology:
Stop The Propaganda: The truth about Big 12 vs. Pac 12 TV numbers
Whenever realignment strikes people tend to throw out television numbers. Truthfully, many claims are not supported by the data.sicem365.com
Discussion as it relates to all college football and individual team rankings:
How Many Viewers Did Your NCAA Team Attract?
We take a look at EVERY FBS team and also compare league by league! Who's the top ten in viewership? How do the ACC schools rank relative to each other? How big a boost does Alabama give the SEC West? It's all inside.sicem365.com
…OK.To a lot of folks that don't respect or like CU, it's this kind of attitude that makes them believe CU grads are unjustifiably haughty. I promise you that an SMU degree has more cachet in most parts of Texas than a CU degree does; the same goes for a BYU degree in Utah. (Grades being equal, etc.) CU is a fine school, but overrating it comes off as provincial and odd.
The snobs killed the Pac-12. It is dead.So much arrogance here and for what?
This arrogance is why things are at this point. PAC 12 presidents thought they were so much better all the while letting Larry Scott run the conference into the ground. Same arrogance that recently let the Big12 swoop in and pull off a coup and negotiate the majority of the remaining tv slots that were still available.
What have you seen from Kliavkoff that makes you think he's capable of pulling off a TV deal that makes remaining in this conference make sense?rebutting your rebuttal-- the point is to try to hold together long enough to draw a better outcome later. we sign our lives away to the ****ing big 12 and we are stuck with the ****ing big 12 and all that entails.
maintaining optionality over time is our best option, imho.
fact is, we don't know. the narrative is being driven by a bunch of ****-head pundits who are actively working to break up the pac. some due to self interest and a whole bunch others due to the usual bias against the west coast.What have you seen from Kliavkoff that makes you think he's capable of pulling off a TV deal that makes remaining in this conference make sense?
I'll wait.
And no one said we were, and athletic affiliation has nothing to do with is anyways.So no, we’re not the same.
We’ve been looking for a rival. If we’re in a conference with Baylor, it’d be instant.Oh god - we have Baylor fans coming here again and links to Baylor websites.
This is reason enough to stay in the Pac12
Allbuffs doesn't like Baylor but your average player and fan doesn't care less.We’ve been looking for a rival. If we’re in a conference with Baylor, it’d be instant.
I don't see much of a natural rival in either conference.We need a real rivalry again. The nebraska game was circled on the calendar every year to look forward to.
I can’t feel any real rivalry with Utah as our rival. Does anyone else?
Question for everyone….Looking at conference expansion and where we end up …… in the big 12 or pac, who would you like to be our rival going forward?
Neither league has good options.We need a real rivalry again. The nebraska game was circled on the calendar every year to look forward to.
I can’t feel any real rivalry with Utah as our rival. Does anyone else?
Question for everyone….Looking at conference expansion and where we end up …… in the big 12 or pac, who would you like to be our rival going forward?
West Virginia: Jed Clampett never understood the Cee-ment pond and Granny put too many dandelion greens into her possum stew.We need a real rivalry again. The nebraska game was circled on the calendar every year to look forward to.
I can’t feel any real rivalry with Utah as our rival. Does anyone else?
Question for everyone….Looking at conference expansion and where we end up …… in the big 12 or pac, who would you like to be our rival going forward?
There won't be pods. SEC and B1G are going to protected rivals + rotating, Big XII will most likely do the same.Neither league has good options.
In the PAC, our travel partner would remain Utah. And I guess that would remain our (forced) rival. I think Oregon would feed much more of the rivalry energy, but CU would be after Washington and Oregon State in the Duck’s view.. Maybe Arizona, but again playing second fiddle toASU.
In the Big 12, I’m not even sure who would be the travel partner if the 4 corner schools jumped. Utah and BYU would be instant rivals and travel partners. It’s entirely possible that CU could be lumped into a midwestern pod with KU, KSU, and ISU since AZ, ASU, Utah, BYU make too much sense as its own pod.
The Big Ten and Nebraska make the most sense honestly.
We built our NU rivalry through playing meaningful games. Once we start competing, we can start developing rivalries.We need a real rivalry again. The nebraska game was circled on the calendar every year to look forward to.
I can’t feel any real rivalry with Utah as our rival. Does anyone else?
Question for everyone….Looking at conference expansion and where we end up …… in the big 12 or pac, who would you like to be our rival going forward?
I ran outYou never forget your first college football rivalry hate. But I have much more hate to give.
if you change your handle to Jerkass God (Alpha Male) and start posting pics of your d-bag exotic sports cars, i am sure you will find your mojo.I ran out