What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

puke GIF
 
even the 2nd best option might be an absolutely dog **** one

I don't yearn for the B12 days either, but options seem to be:

-stay in the P12, add random MWC teams, hope UO/UW don't dip at the first chance, likely get a ****ty tv deal
-go to the B12, most notable team is apparently Okie St, gross as ****
-merge with the B12, at least hopefully keep the good parts of the P12 and good football B12 I guess.

idk I don't love any options, but we seem ****ed

tbh even going to the B1G isn't that appealing from a football perspective. Like, games against Indiana at 9 AM PST don't do it for me, but we need that ****ing money. Plus games against the upper end of the conference would be fun

giphy.gif


in a perfect world, the P12 un****s itself a decade ago, works something out with Texas/Okie and a few others and we have a massive TV deal, but we done ****ed that up so
 
This would be a good team to discuss a merger with the B12. Playing in Texas again would have some recruiting benefits.

No mergers unless we have the bay schools and PNW schools committed. This is a chance to bury the terrible leadership that killed this conference. Giving them leverage only to have UO, UW, and probably Stanford leave anyway would be a terrible choice.
 
I’m somewhat surprised that people haven’t recognized what makes sports fun. It’s certainly not being an also-ran in a field/tier with the likes of Alabama and Georgia. I’ve mentioned on this board for years that everyone would be happier if they understood and accepted how truly far behind all the western schools are from the SEC. There really is no formula for national relevance for Colorado without coming up with some white knight scenarios (like an actual Knight, Phil). You need to be competitive and you need real rivalries.

Of course, in the highly unlikely event that CU was offered an invite to the Big Ten, you take it. And that would make CU more competitive, although it really still doesn’t mask all the other deficiencies regarding recruiting footprint, NIL support, fan support, and school support. All the SEC money hasn’t made Vanderbilt any better.

Personally, I don’t care if CU is playing down a level. That’s ok. Just be competitive in that league. And be part of a regional league, one where you play nearby schools. It’s more fun. I always feel the smaller schools have been having way more fun than we sometimes recognize. And if you want to watch the best of the best in the sport, go catch a Broncos game.
That’s fair I just think it’s hard for a bunch of 35 year old CU fans to accept that this program doesn’t even have the chance to be part of the national conversation by being in a lower tier league
 
The problem with merging the Pac 10 and Big 12 is that anything less $1B/year for that conference and it doesn’t matter. Even at $1B/year, spread across 22 teams, that’s $45m/year per team when the B1G and SEC will be around $100m/each.

A full on merger of conferences would need media revenue to come in somewhere around $2B/year for the conference of 22 programs to come remotely close to what the B1G and SEC are getting and we know that’s not going to happen.
 
I believe the conference Presidents and ADs are very responsible for the mess the PAC12 is in. They allowed Larry Scott to proceed on his path with little questioning and little supervision. Larry Scott made $50 million off the PAC12 and destroyed it. But the Presidents deserve their share of the blame, Jon Wilner has been pointing out for years the flaws with Larry Scott and the direction of the PAC12. But no one stood up to stop a captain who had taken the ship off course.

The argument of which conference is the weakest has been answered - it is the PAC?
Sucks how? Moving to the PAC was the right call at the time. The incompetence after we switched conferences is what killed CU football.
I think our problem was many things.

Hanks right. We got hurt a lot by the Pacific time zone.

But we got hurt the most by the TV king makers that decided Central and East teams were the best for their bottom lines and rewarded them. The Central and East are more densely populated than the West (Another strike against us). Our games got on as a late night filler after thought.

AHoel is also right that leaving the fertile recruiting grounds of Texas for the less fertile grounds of California also hurt us. Parents have stopped letting their kids play football. Most of the schools in the Pac struggle to recruit except for one compared to their central and east rivals.

BlackNgold is right that the Presidents were too hands off with Scott. Kudos to him for getting us the best deal in that 1st year. Only to be eclipsed and passed by the B1G and then SEC. Too bad OU and UT refused. Kind of sucks that after the P12 its A few MW schools and no obvious add. And at least 8 to 9 of the Presidents seemed ok dokie with the status quo.

They call all that death by a thousand cuts.
 
again, TIFWIW as who knows about this guy, but he did call SC and UCLA to B1G back in April (before that as well)








It occurred to me that this is a pretty logical idea. Im not sure its a great idea. But its a vast improvement in terms of the unknown right in front of us right now.

With the TV people I think they have dollar amount limits that might stop the B1G at LA schools. ND saying NO probably ends expansion for now because of the loss of excitement and momentum only ND can generate.

None of that BigPac24 merger stops the B1G from picking off the next two best pieces in say 5 years.

For USC and UCLA, and for some members of the BigPac24, the distances traveling here will be a strain in terms of money, schedules, and educational outcomes.
 
Last edited:
If it is the four schools jumping to the Big 12, I cannot understand why people would be mad. That is a legitimate conference.

I wonder how many of those people ever experienced the nirvana of the Big 8. I know it's too early to tell what the divisions (if there will be any) will be like but having UA, ASU, Utah, BYU, CU, KU, KSU, and maybe ISU will still be fun to watch in football. I'm tickled by the thought of what basketball is going to be like.

If one of those has an undefeated season, the CFP is doable and wouldn't this set up have a better chance of making the CFP than the current Pac-12?
 
None of that BigPac24 merger stops the B1G from picking off the next two best pieces in say 5 years.

I guess unless, as the guy says, they make UO and UW (and everyone else) sign a big ol GOR. You could (in theory) placate everyone by saying, okay, let's sign this GOR til 2035, since the ACC's GOR goes that long anyway, and that would (again in theory) probably keep everything in place til then.

BUT, if I'm Oregon, and this BigPac doesn't give me at least $50M (and I don't see this thing getting $1.2B), I don't want to really be sitting around for 15 years while USC, UCLA, et al get $100M per. Yeah, Uncle Phil's awesome and all, but come on.

Plus **** anything to do with not burning the Pac-12 network to the ground.
 
How interested in Miami, Clemson and and FSU will the SEC be? They already own the footprint. How much more $$ do those programs bring that conference?

Expansion for any conference is going to be about brand, not market. Many of the top brand schools are in small college towns but the name draws eyes.

At this point anything is on the table. I wouldn't be surprised to see the SEC invite Oregon/UW and they're undoubtedly talking to ND. Needless to say it's doubtful ND would join the SEC but ND only has 2 options if they join a conference, the SEC and B1G.
 
Got my 1st season tickets in 1966. Attended most games the next 40 years.
Games in the Big 8 era were great, lots of rivalries, people had a ton of fun. It was cool to finish high in the league (top 3), go to a bowl.
A plus, in those days there were a lot of Colorado kids who got a shot and excelled.
IMO, you all are corrupted by the craving for media and attention. We have to be ranked, we have to be national contenders.
Let's get in a competitive league and enjoy.
 
Expansion for any conference is going to be about brand, not market. Many of the top brand schools are in small college towns but the name draws eyes.

At this point anything is on the table. I wouldn't be surprised to see the SEC invite Oregon/UW and they're undoubtedly talking to ND. Needless to say it's doubtful ND would join the SEC but ND only has 2 options if they join a conference, the SEC and B1G.

You never know what'll happen, but if either the Big Ten or SEC are smart, they let ND stew until they're stuck with deciding to be left out or join a conference on equal terms as everyone else.
 
This whole downward spiral for CU was obviously brought on by themselves as we all know. They were spooked by the fake scandal and never recovered. But I will also say the the move to the Pac12 give CU more reason to de-emphasize football and let them think they were an elite academic institution. The Pac 12 is full of apathetic fanbases whose admins snub their noses at elite football powers around the country.

Larry Scott held an introductory press conference in NYC saying he was going to make the Pac12 a national brand and everything went downhill from there, starting with the P12 Network which is one of the biggest running jokes in college football. The presidents and LS then double downed by refusing to partner the network with Fox or ESPN. They snubbed their noses at adding schools from Texas, the Oklahoma schools, or BYU. The affiliation with the Pac12 has attributed to the downfall of CU football because it enabled our administration to even further downplay the importance of football as a front porch of the university.

This conference is getting exactly what it deserves. Good for USC and UCLA for bolting to a real football conference. They didn't want to be stuck in this **** show when the B1G and SEC are pulling away from everyone else.
 
If ND agrees to join B1G…

1. the best +1 partner is Oregon.

2. the best +3 partners are Oregon, UDub, Stanford.

All depends on what ND does. And if B1G wants 18 team conference or 20. If ND balks, I think they stay at16.

That’s my $0.02 summary.
 
If ND agrees to join B1G…

1. the best +1 partner is Oregon.

2. the best +3 partners are Oregon, UDub, Stanford.

All depends on what ND does. And if B1G wants 18 team conference or 20. If ND balks, I think they stay at16.

That’s my $0.02 summary.
I read somewhere that we were a package deal with ND.

Im so sick of watching losses. I’m actually coming around to the idea of playing wherever we can be competitive, national relevance be damned.
 
Hopefully the BigXII powers that be say we don’t want to work with anything resembling the current PAC12 network, and want to have their games and conference news more accessible to casual viewers.

I will be so happy to have many CU games on ESPN+ and that will help with the exposure. If the P12 says eff it with the P12N and puts P12N games on ESPN+ this year and next year before moving to the B12, that would be great.
 
Back
Top