God, I miss this so much.No. Instead, we should immediately bring a motion to rename the conference.
Then hit up Raycom for the big media dollars.
God, I miss this so much.No. Instead, we should immediately bring a motion to rename the conference.
Then hit up Raycom for the big media dollars.
Remember when you knew that if you won the Big 8, you were going the Orange Bowl, instead of waiting until the end of the season to see where you were going, and then actually having your entire team play to win, instead of opt outs, was a BFD?
I was more referring to the logo, but living in ACC land, when I saw a game with Raycom at the bottom of the screen, I did a double take.Raycom is who connected the ACC to the CW for more linear games
Made me chuckle just saying Raycom
View attachment 62706
Klatt had another emergency pod from Thursday before it all happened. Went through everything and at the end touched on FSU and basically said they aren’t going anywhere. They don’t have the money and the only conference (of the P2) that might take them is SEC right now. Also said the ACC isn’t going to dissolve because that would mean the SEC would have to guarantee multiple entries and and ESPN isn’t going to negotiate against itself in paying more for the same content they already have at a fee discount in the ACCGoing to be very interesting to see how ACC plays out. My gut tells me not much changes because of current contracts, but who knows how bad FSU wants out.
NmThose pods suck.
I have Phillips 66 lined for Ad $No. Instead, we should immediately bring a motion to rename the conference.
Then hit up Raycom for the big media dollars.
Yep, agreed. Not to mention the debtThe name of the conference may carry on, but it the PAC12 was doomed once USC and UCLA announced they were bolting. Losing Oregon, UW, AZ, and AZ State was just putting dirt on the coffin. CU and Utah leaving wasn’t as big considering they didn’t share in the tradition and history of the conference over the long haul.
The PAC squandered so many opportunities that brought us here. It was a great conference for so long. The TV fiasco, failing to get on DirectTV, when the league started was mismanagement. Passing on expansion last year was equally dumb.
I think its in alphabetical orderThose pods suck.
No elite programs, but with Kansas, CU and Arizona on the up and up, there’s no real bottom feeders. It’s going to be competitive. If Prime can keep recruiting at a top 20 type level, CU should be very successful in itActually a really tough conference seeing it laid out like that.
Parity in football. It will be really interesting.Actually a really tough conference seeing it laid out like that.
Talk about the times changing; the NFL champ playing the College All-Stars in August:Remember when you knew that if you won the Big 8, you were going the Orange Bowl, instead of waiting until the end of the season to see where you were going, and then actually having your entire team play to win, instead of opt outs, was a BFD?
Klatt talked about how while other leagues designed their scheduling to promote top programs and playoff berths, the Pac 12 pretty much scheduled to promote parity, which is partly why we haven’t seen the Pac 12 represented in the CFP much.Parity in football. It will be really interesting.
yes.. I have Crohn's disease also.He's a party pooper.
Klatt talked about how while other leagues designed their scheduling to promote top programs and playoff berths, the Pac 12 pretty much scheduled to promote parity, which is partly why we haven’t seen the Pac 12 represented in the CFP much.
The new Big 12 is going to have natural parity, will likely only have two or so CFP representatives in a given year, and be a conference with fun, competitive matchups.
I love CFB because every Saturday is fun and meaningful. This is a big part of why I’m excited about the move. Teams with similar competitive footing focused on fun matchups. Any teams can rise and fall any given year. I rarely watch the CFP so as long as the regular season feels like real CFB that’s what I’m aboutKlatt talked about how while other leagues designed their scheduling to promote top programs and playoff berths, the Pac 12 pretty much scheduled to promote parity, which is partly why we haven’t seen the Pac 12 represented in the CFP much.
The new Big 12 is going to have natural parity, will likely only have two or so CFP representatives in a given year, and be a conference with fun, competitive matchups.
According to the Athletic article, he also hired his friend’s boutique consulting company for this so a nice bit of cronyism sprinkled into the mixIt is now pretty obvious why George Kliavkoff did not want to present his media deal numbers. Rumor was ESPN offered them initially $28.5 Million per team per year during the exclusive period but the PAC turned it down because they thought they were being lowballed and were shooting for $50 Million believing they were worth a lot more than they were in reality. The trouble was the market place had shifted and they were not attuned with it. Kliavkoff gets no pass from me, he was supposedly media savvy but turned out to be an idiot.
look left for the first clue.@sackman is still looking for that grill
Those aren't PODS. It's all the BIG12 schools in alphabetical order.Those pods suck.