SIAP but Utah was the president and professor that came up with the $50M number and killed the ESPN deal. Think speculation at the time was ASU.
If I recall we were blaming Cal, no?
SIAP but Utah was the president and professor that came up with the $50M number and killed the ESPN deal. Think speculation at the time was ASU.
Anyway we can get Sims as QB again for those Georgia Tech games?The Buffs are walking into a much much better situation with the Big12 in terms of platforms and places for our games. No more P12N to make us disappear, and you know that we will be getting almost all the best spots throughout the year on ESPN.
One thing we need to is schedule OOC very strong, contrary to thoughts of a weaker schedule.
Publicity is better than anything for us, so do we not look at North Dakota and CSU as games to get rid of?
Go get Oregon State and Washington State for those!
View attachment 65774View attachment 65775
Tbh I stopped reading this thread about 705 pages agoIf I recall we were blaming Cal, no?
Me too! Hadn’t read in weeks and checked it today and saw that it had become focused on truck stops.Tbh I stopped reading this thread about 705 pages ago
Oh noes, accused of having a hot take on a message board filled with hot takes. I’m so injured.
It's Big 10 country but that's what I have heard they do at truck stops in Nebraska.Me too! Hadn’t read in weeks and checked it today and saw that it had become focused on truck stops.
****ing Big12.
Which one?? Indiana / Northwestern? Maryland / Rutgers? Minnesota / Rutgers? Iowa / Northwestern? I’m vomiting typing this.There are a lot of uninteresting matchups on that schedule
Asking for details on a subject to which nobody would have any details and you think that’s giving the benefit of the doubt? Sure thing Jimmy.I apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt originally. My mistake. Won't insult you further by doing it again.
I know it.Which one?? Indiana / Northwestern? Maryland / Rutgers? Minnesota / Rutgers? Iowa / Northwestern? I’m vomiting typing this.
SIAP but Utah was the president and professor that came up with the $50M number and killed the ESPN deal. Think speculation at the time was ASU.
KSU v OSU was on Yesterday and I threw up in my mouth just thinking about it.Anymore than the Big 12 CU is walking into?
UW vs UM/tOSU/SC/Oregon/PSU/Wis/MSU/UCLA all seem pretty interesting.
The content the B1G is going to put out is going to be incredible, IMO. It’s just not going to be great from an on field results standpoint for a lot of teams who have playoff aspirations.
SIAP but Utah was the president and professor that came up with the $50M number and killed the ESPN deal. Think speculation at the time was ASU.
Other than Coach Prime and TCU the rest of the conference were joining’s football interest is limited to the state the team in question resides in. And in some cases those teams are even highly regionally limited within their respective states (TT to UT, a UCF to UF/FSU/UM, an OSU to OU). Over time these uncompelling matchups could be a problem for CU.My gut tells me that the the Big 12 contract could turn into a bargain for the networks. Especially if we can hold onto CP.
I share this concern, but I think that the lack of a clear marquee brand could make things a bit more compelling as the brands struggle for supremacy. (I hope)Other than Coach Prime and TCU the rest of the conference were joining’s football interest is limited to the state the team in question resides in. And in some cases those teams are even highly regionally limited within their respective states (TT to UT, a UCF to UF/FSU/UM, an OSU to OU). Over time these uncompelling matchups could be a problem for CU.
So does the SEC or Big10 grab us for 2025?I comprehend what you’re saying fine. I just completely disagree.
Call out all the variables you want, but my argument is simple.
If Colorado is winning and top 25 all next year, no single game any week or aggregate of games by any other team will match Colorado.
As Prime says, we will dominate.
Announcement eminent.So does the SEC or Big10 grab us for 2025?
This is sad.
Yeah. With a healthy Rising, Utah is easily the best this year. Struggling at the moment, though.It's also all wrong - Fixed it
1) Utah
2) Kansas
3) WVU
4) CU
5) BYU
6) KSU
7) OSU
8) TCU
9) TT
10) ISU
11) AZ.
12) Cincy
13) ASU
14) UH
15) Baylor
16) UCF
The rivalry with Utah might actually be fully embraced when we are playing each other over and over for conference titles
I don't think we'll have divisions. Everyone is going away from that. Better chance of sending teams to the playoffs if your best 2 teams play in the CCG.I may have missed it (I have not peeked into this thread after the change was announced), has the Big 12 announced divisions yet?
It's also all wrong - Fixed it
1) Utah
2) Kansas
3) WVU
4) CU
5) BYU
6) KSU
7) OSU
8) TCU
9) TT
10) ISU
11) AZ.
12) Cincy
13) ASU
14) UH
15) Baylor
16) UCF
CU won 10 games in 2016 and was in the Pac-12 Championship.I know none of the Hateful 8 were big football brands, but everyone but Kansas been good at some point over the last decade, which is more than you guys can say.
It's the most wide open conference in the P4 with no traditional blue blood and a bunch of teams that can't sustain high level success. That's why Utah is right in thinking it's probably going to be the heavy favorite to win the B12 next year. In year one with Prime, CU's recruiting class was better than every Big 12 program not named Texas and OU, which is also why CU fans are optimistic that the Buffs will probably be a co-favorite to win the conference.Funny how a lot of middling Pac 12 teams think they're going to dominate the Big XII. Utah I understand, and you guys are justifiable, but I saw an AZ guy talking about running the conference. Even ASU thinks they could start to turn it around. I know none of the Hateful 8 were big football brands, but everyone but Kansas been good at some point over the last decade, which is more than you guys can say. Glad to see Pac 12 hubris will survive the conference. I was worried for a minute there.
Final record for you guys...6-6 I'd say...maybe you sneak to 7. About where I think my Cyclones will be. Bene a fun season so far, though.