Or cu brings in the boulder/Denver market! Boulder could care less about cu.
Or cu brings in the boulder/Denver market! Boulder could care less about cu.
Or cu brings in the boulder/Denver market! Boulder could care less about cu.
Who dis? New phone.Or cu brings in the boulder/Denver market! Boulder could care less about cu.
You are correct here, and I'm not sure the DU model could be repeated many places.I think DU is a bad example. Oddly enough, hockey and Gymnastics are revenue sports at DU, while basketball isn’t. DU is essentially a D-2 school for most things outside of those sports (and skiing, but that’s a passion sport for DU much the same way as it is at CU). Long story short, competing in hockey won’t be a problem. Where they might have issues is in the more obscure sports like soccer and swimming.
You guys are so funny! Get a clue on the politics of boulder!
Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.Somebody help me on how the politics of Boulder have anything to do with CU delivering the Denver TV market.
Beyond that, if I read Fred’s remark correctly, Boulder is supportive of CU athletics. I mean he did say they could care less.
Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Wait. You said Boulder could care less. So could they or not?Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Fred 2 knows that what he is posting is idiotic, he's a troll and has managed to get some posters here to engage.Hmmm. Interesting that CSU averaged 26,500 fans per home game in 2023 or 73% of stadium capacity. CU averaged 53,000+ at 106% of capacity. I can see your point here that the Rams have better fan support. Yep, makes complete sense. Of course, if that is a problem, I'm sure the CSU HC's wife can speak up for him and explain the situation.
2023 FBS Attendance Trends | D1 ticker
A look at FBS attendance for the 2023 season compared to year-over-year and five-year-over-year averages. | Data through Week 13.www.d1ticker.com
Or cu brings in the boulder/Denver market! Boulder could care less about cu.
Fred, it’s been a long time since CU and Boulder haven’t mutually depended upon one another. It’s a settled peace with some happiness mixed in. You need to find another contrast. Ft. Fun and CSU are boring to the world and to each other.Yes you are an idiot! ft fun cares more about the rams than boulder cares about cu! Fact! The city does not embrace university and sees it as a hindrance.
Well that’s only if you don’t account for population; according to the US Census, the population estimate for 2022 for Boulder was 106K, whereas Fort Collins had fewer people with an estimated population of 169K.Hmmm. Interesting that CSU averaged 26,500 fans per home game in 2023 or 73% of stadium capacity. CU averaged 53,000+ at 106% of capacity. I can see your point here that the Rams have better fan support. Yep, makes complete sense. Of course, if that is a problem, I'm sure the CSU HC's wife can speak up for him and explain the situation.
2023 FBS Attendance Trends | D1 ticker
A look at FBS attendance for the 2023 season compared to year-over-year and five-year-over-year averages. | Data through Week 13.www.d1ticker.com
Some are there just hoping to hear some Lady Gaga songs.26,500? I find that hard to believe
Article is behind a paywall but I don't believe this for a second
Article is behind a paywall but I don't believe this for a second
No to autobids
The number feels like 50 between the super leagues. I think the Big 12s emphasis on basketball likely keeps it at the table to an extent if we're stuck here after the ACC collapses.This is my point. A 30 team league will eat itself alive. You need the Vanderbilts, Mississippi States, Rutgers and Indianas to do a couple things: first, to give Michigan and Georgia a week off, but also to make for a great story when those schools break out and do well.
30 is way too low, 80 is way too high. 64 is a good number that provides for a lot of schools to have a seat at the table while everybody gets ridiculously rich. If you believe, as I do, that we are eventually heading to a 14-game season and a 16-team playoff, 64 is the perfect number. The entertainment over the next 10-15 years will be watching the teams right on that bubble fight each other like rats in a sock.
Let's see what happens if they go 9-3 in 2024. Games against Vanderbilt for Alabama serve a purpose. Same thing that games against Baylor (who if we're honest is awful right now) will do for CU.That implies that Alabama a) wants a conference and b) wants South Carolina to be a part of it and I have doubts about both.
I have seen this exact same thing play out elsewhere. The big teams will keep pushing for a bigger piece of the pie as they win more, contribute more and attract more people and at one point break away from the rest and do their own thing where they can decide who's part of it and make the rules as they see fit.