Hoping they're at least a 2 seed since I believe they would get the first 2 NCAA games at home.
Top 4 seeds get to host the first 2 rounds
Hoping they're at least a 2 seed since I believe they would get the first 2 NCAA games at home.
Unfortunately, it helps CU's NET when LSU wins.My least favorite coach Kim Mulkey's LSU team lost to Mississippi State last night
I think our last 5 games and the final 9 are all Quad 1. SOS is not really a factor so much as winning enough of these to get a 1- or 2-seed instead of a 3- or 4-.Unfortunately, it helps CU's NET when LSU wins.
Unfortunately, it helps CU's NET when LSU wins.
Hope RG has realized he's gonna have to pay a LOT more money to have her as a coach next year
I still think there is a correlation to what he choses to do with JR and what he is willing to do when it comes time to replace Tad - whether it is Tad or RGs choice is irrelevant.It is about time. If he wants the women's basketball program to stay relevant, he is going to have to fork over the BIG BUCKS.
He hired her on the cheap but the price tag is way higher now and last year's contract doesn't jive with what she has accomplished.
Wait... you think there's a non-zero chance RG replaces Tad with someone that isn't a dud?If he won't pay for a proven commodity to keep her here, there is ZERO chance he will bring in anyone other than a dud to replace Tad.
If I win Powerball, we're good. Jamahl Mosley would only meet the minimum standard I'd bankroll.Wait... you think there's a non-zero chance RG replaces Tad with someone that isn't a dud?
He accidentally hired JR - I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest he didn't hire her because he KNEW she'd have us in the top 5 for the entire season. He got lucky - it could happen again.Wait... you think there's a non-zero chance RG replaces Tad with someone that isn't a dud?
JR was an unknown at the P5 level. I didn't know if we would ever get to this level since JR inherited a bare cupboard and had some big misses with recruits and transfers in the early years.He accidentally hired JR - I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest he didn't hire her because he KNEW she'd have us in the top 5 for the entire season. He got lucky - it could happen again.
Still a 2 seed with being the automatic qualifier. Stanford a 1 seed. I do not understand.
Women's Bracketology: One upset, one big jump for Maryland
How much can one upset impact the bracket? After toppling Duke, Maryland moved from a No. 5 seed to the No. 13 overall team.www.espn.com
Right now, CU has the same conference record as Stanford (9-2) and a similar overall record (20-3 for stanford vs. 19-3 for Colorado), and the same record (4-2) against top 25 teams. However, i think if you look at CU's body of work, it's better overall (slightly).
I think the only justification is that CU has a much tougher schedule down the stretch and may drop more games than Stanford down the stretch, but you'd think if it was close and CU had a stronger SOS and won the P12 tourney that they'd be a 1 over stanford.
I think this is completely valid, and I agree that if the tournament started today that they would have a better resume than CU.Re: Stanford being bracketed higher. It's hard to ignore a #2 NET ranking. They also have more Q1 wins, and have played a stronger schedule (non-con). It's debatable, since we beat them, but I don't see it as an injustice.
View attachment 69731
View attachment 69732
I'm not sure about this particular bracketologist, but I know others notate AQs not based on projections, but on current standings. This is typically most relevant for single-bid conferences.I think this is completely valid, and I agree that if the tournament started today that they would have a better resume than CU.
But the bracketology projection had CU winning the P12 tournament. If they're going to project CU to win the P12 tourney, then I don't understand how that scenario wouldn't put CU over Stanford because in that hypothetical CU will either have 2 more Quad 1 wins than Stanford from the tournament OR have beaten Stanford H2H twice.