I'm thinking with the future cash infusion from the Pac 12 TV revenue, Colorado can start aiming towards having 7 home games a year a little more often.
I'd like to see us play 1 big time game a year. Then we have CSU every year which I'd say is not quite a cupcake. For the last two I'd like to see us play decent teams that have a pulse, but hopefully are easy wins. Toledo and Montana State should be easy wins btw. I think it'd also be nice if we could schedule some games against Texas teams so it's not like we're never in Texas playing games (maybe helps a little with recruiting).
I'm thinking with the future cash infusion from the Pac 12 TV revenue, Colorado can start aiming towards having 7 home games a year a little more often.
This is tougher that it first looks. Every team in the P12 has the same limitation as CU, only three OOC. Every BCS school wants 7 home games. If you are the Troy athletic director, you also want 6 home games. When Troy offers up a one-and-done with Nebraska, it's because the Nebraska AD has a bigger bag of cash than the next guy.
Schools who whore themselves out for a paycheck (*cough*CU@tOSU*cough) can stand to make some serious money. Schools like Utah State, Webber, UNLV, Idaho, South Dakota, New Mexico State, and others are going to stop answering the phone because of the number of P12 schools begging them for a one-and-done. This will force CU into looking at Northern Colorado, School of Mines, and CSU-Pueblo to help fill the dance card.
In 2014 CU apparently plays in Hawaii again (was this a 2 for 2 arrangement??)...
I say F&^% the BCS and give me a huge game every week
I say we set up a 1 and done with Grand River University.
I will take a close loss to a good team over a blowout against San Diego State any time.
This is a topic that I am really passionate about. WE SHOULD PLAY NO CUPCAKES. I don't care what the other teams are doing to back into BCS bowls to get beat by Boise State etc...
I want to see quality wins. I will take a close loss to a good team over a blowout against San Diego State any time.
If we are good enough to WIN a BCS bowl or conference championship in the first place, the wins will come.
This is a topic that I am really passionate about. WE SHOULD PLAY NO CUPCAKES. I don't care what the other teams are doing to back into BCS bowls to get beat by Boise State etc...
I want to see quality wins. I will take a close loss to a good team over a blowout against San Diego State any time.
If we are good enough to WIN a BCS bowl or conference championship in the first place, the wins will come.
I understand your passion and agree with your sentiment. I also agree that when Colorado is a perennial top 25 program again that the non con should adjust accordingly when we are in the discussion for post season BCS/championships. However to force that kind of schedule on the school know just makes no sense. When people point to team records even just from 2 years ago, they don't care who you played in your non conference, they just read the record. Colorado needs to take advantage of the system that they are forced to play in as much as possible to succeed.
I don't consider the SDSUs of the world to be cupcakes. I'm happy as long as I don't see 1AA teams on the schedule.
I agree, the system is what gets everyone. Bowl games are cool and all, but unless you're in a BCS bowl it's usually just some game with 20,000 fans in a ****** town on the gulf coast.
Blowing out cupcakes is really boring, and a horrible waste of a home game. I'm all for playing cupcakes on the road, but don't devalue season tickets.
For example, I go to almost every Texas game here in Austin, and they typically start the year with 3 home blowouts before conference play. Its boring as hell. The stadium is 1/4 full after halftime...
Are you kidding? They get way more than they deserve. They are able to rest their starters almost every game and avoid injuries unlike schools in big time conferences. They only have to "get up" for two games a year. If they were in the SEC, x-Big 12 or whatever they call it now, or the PAC 12, they would have to "get up" almost every week. Avoiding injuries, resting players, and playing second rate competition almost every week, and then being rated in the Top 10. Why would they want it any different?Boise doesn't get where it wants because it plays in the WAC and plays teams like San Jose State, New Mexico State, Utah State, Idaho, etc and only play one or two real teams a year.
Do you mean Toledo kill CU?I think that teams tend to play to the level of their competition. If you start the season with cupcakes once you hit conference play you're ****ed (see Nebraska and Texas)
Also, our games have a shot of getting televised if they are against a BCS school, and we will draw many more fans. No one outside of Colorado (except for people on allbuffs and fans of the other team) cares about CU vs Montana State, CU vs New Mexico State, CU vs Wyoming etc...
And who wants to travel to boulder to see CU kill Toledo?
(yes i purposely used some cupcakes that Danny sucked against)
Need at least 1 challenge in the non-conference. I'd love to see a "Colorado Kickoff" every season where we play Nebraska or Michigan or Notre Dame (etc., etc.) at Invesco every year to open the year. After that, keep the schedule relatively light. Try to get 2 home games in the years we have 5 Pac-12 roadies against only 4 home conference games.
Not only "no", but "HELL NO! and are you out of your freaking mind?!?!"
The fewer games at Invesco, the better. I don't care who the opponent is. I hate that place.