To the "get ugly" part. Good. Scott needs to start feeling some heat.
So he has that going for him, which is nice! :lol:At least Ed Rush didn't call Miller a *******.
Ha, you beat me to my edit. I kind of felt bad after I posted that.So he has that going for him, which is nice! :lol:
Not surprised.. It will get worse.. Ed Rush Pac-12 head of officials investigated for targeting Arizona's Sean Miller http://t.co/NApLgGIJcu
@mcuban 5 hours ago
Referee Michael Irving -- who sources confirmed was in the room with Rush on Friday -- hit Miller with a controversial technical with 4:37 left in the Pac-12 semifinals against UCLA. The Bruins wound up winning the game, 66-64. Miller was upset about a double-dribble call on Arizona point guard Mark Lyons, arguing that a UCLA player had gotten his hand on the ball before Lyons picked it up.
Miller later claimed he did not direct any profanities at Irving or any of the other officials at the time. The technical was his first of the season.
“The reason I got the technical foul is because I said, ‘He touched the ball. He touched the ball. He touched the ball. He touched the ball. He touched the ball,'" Miller said immediately after the loss. Miller was reprimanded by the Pac-12 and fined $25,000 by the league for confronting a game official after the game had concluded, as well as for acting inappropriately toward a Pac-12 staffer in the hallway of the arena.
"As a basketball referee, it's a horrible position to be put in by your supervisor," he continued. "If you don't do anything, you probably won't get any good games down the road -- or you may not get any games at all. That leaves us in a tough spot."
"He's a bully," the referee said of Rush. "He just bullies everyone. That was his whole tenor of the meeting on Friday. We're all afraid of him. He's the most respected basketball officiating person on the West Coast and he's been given all the juice."
Completely agree. And it's why Buffnik will probably lose his seat on the Board of Directors for the Canadian Power Trio Hall of Fame. You just can't joke about that kid of stuff, Nik!Was Rush joking? It was an inappropriate joke if he was. There are some things in our professional lives we can't joke about because it undermines the integrity of our profession. Each profession probably has a couple of taboos, and I'm flabbergasted that even joking about offering incentives to give a certain coach a "T" isn't a firing offense.
And of course that joke came from somewhere--I'm guessing as a joke it was half-hearted at best.
A joke, just like Henry II's.
Is that the name of the restaurant with all the goofy **** on the wall and the mozzarella sticks?
and on queue Andy Glockner turns up the heat.
The Pac-12 simply cannot have this. Larry Scott cannot enable this. He’s too savvy a businessman to believe he can brush this under the rug and have Pac-12 basketball operate under a cloud of suspicion. Rush may very well have been joking, but the impact of his words, both on the referees who report to him and to the fans who watch his league, is anything but a joke. The only joke would be if the league does nothing about this.
At least the C-Unit has a built in chant for blown/bad/controversial calls next year. Don't chant "Bull****", chant "Cancun" instead. The league office will get pretty tired of hearing that one in a hurry I'm guessing.
"Payyyyy-Rolllll" "Mo-ney Talks" "You've been bought" "We've been Rush'd"
The band needs to learn AC/DC's "Money Talks".
That would be great. I really like "Can-cun" as a chant. Easy to chant, a little funnier than the others, makes the point...
The fact that this is the lead story on Sports Center means Rush can start packing his office up now. Too much of a media storm for him to stay. And given the tech called against Miller in the UCLA game, he was at best joking about giving a reward for a tech on Miller in order to emphasize t-ing Miller up.
The fact that this is the lead story on Sports Center means Rush can start packing his office up now. Too much of a media storm for him to stay. And given the tech called against Miller in the UCLA game, he was at best joking about giving a reward for a tech on Miller in order to emphasize t-ing Miller up.
He’s still going to get fired but Scott now appears weak.
Anyone know the backstory on this, i.e., why does Rush apparently have a bug up his ass re Miller? Do these guys have a history with each other?
I agree that whether he was "joking" or not is irrelevant ... when you target an individual as the butt of a joke, it exhibits a disrespect that one's subordinates pick up on. It would be like your boss made a joke about a colleague in a meeting with his subordinates at which the colleague was not present. It sends the wrong message. Rush must go ASAP.