I vote for LB and the skiboot technique. You can lead a horse to water, but if you can't make him drink it, you can always kick him into it with a skiboot:smile2:
Well Said...I was not trying to point blame, I was just stating that if this was on the university as a whole i would believe we see more of the same. IMOI do not see this as a "fault" issue. Pointing fingers will not resolve the fact that students are not passing. Changing the way that educators approach their students can move mountains - and there is a wealth of research that supports that idea.
The University cannot change the way that lectures are given. That is a professional decision for each professor to make. However, the Athletic Department has absolute control over how tutoring sessions work. Employing sound teaching strategies can only benefit students.
While you cannot force a horse to drink water, you would be suprised how many absolutely will drink from the spring of knowledge if you just know how to handle the horse.
I vote for LB and the skiboot technique. You can lead a horse to water, but if you can't make him drink it, you can always kick him into it with a skiboot
:smile2:
The University cannot change the way that lectures are given. That is a professional decision for each professor to make. However, the Athletic Department has absolute control over how tutoring sessions work. Employing sound teaching strategies can only benefit students.
:yeahthat:
the academic casualties are concerning, though. who oversees the techniques that the tutors use? are the student-athletes academic styles identified and matched to instruction? do the tutors have the means to employ multi-modal instruction? if they rely on aural instruction, that could be why so many athletes are falling off the bus - only a small percentage of people are successful with that mode of learning.
perhaps i need to move back to colorado and revolutionize the instructional methods of faculty and tutoring staff? there should be NO REASON for academic failure given the resources the university provides - however, if their methodolgy is not sound, very little learning can take place. maybe our university needs to better serve the student athletes by working smarter with them.
Ahhh...someone who actually understands the learning process. I had not thought of that but that is a very good point.
The athletic department is hiring for athletic study hall "monitors". Pays $10 an hour.
For any of us who went to CU, we know that it's very much a "sink or swim" institution. In the general student population, you either figure out what you have to do to succeed or you're out. Athletes are given a safety net, which is fine by me. But, they do have that safety net that isn't available to the rest of the students.
And yes, I understand that the demands on their time are great, but so are the demands on a regular student's time if he/she is working him/herself through school.
For any of us who went to CU, we know that it's very much a "sink or swim" institution. In the general student population, you either figure out what you have to do to succeed or you're out. Athletes are given a safety net, which is fine by me. But, they do have that safety net that isn't available to the rest of the students.
And yes, I understand that the demands on their time are great, but so are the demands on a regular student's time if he/she is working him/herself through school.
Also, I'd have to assume that most of the guys that turn up ineligible aren't doing poorly because the tutors aren't doing a good job helping. For the most part they are doing poorly because instead of going to class and doing the readings they are playing X-Box, chasing skirt, and working on their smile (so they can charm profs).
that is quite possible. as an educator, i would love to know what they are doing that they find is working and is not working, particularly in light of bohn's comments about student athletes, academics, and a hinted at process improvement.
I meant to add, however, that I do think that the more effective the instruction and educational assistance, the more likely it is that marginal students will decide they want to go to class and do the work.
This assumes that it's somehow the school's responsibility to motivate them. CU isn't in the business of motivating its students to do anything. It's in the business of teaching them. It's the student's responsibility to learn. I'll agree that there are some instructors who are more effective at motivating their students than others.
To me, it's simple. If I'm Fataagi and I know I'm in trouble academically, I do what I can to rectify the situation. Now we can't know for sure what he did or didn't do, but whatever he did, it wasn't enough.
I'm a big believer in personal responsibility. As far as I'm concerned, Fataagi did not take enough responsibility for his own situation.
It's not the schools fault. The student have every opportunity to get the help they need. You can lead a horse to water but can't make him drink. If the school was in fault I believe you would see this problem more than you do.
Actually, ut has completed a study about this question. Their findings conclude that this statement is not true. One can lead a horse to water and make it drink. The study group found that it takes 3 texans.
Two to hold the horse's head under water, while the other sucks on its ass.
reptasticactually, ut has completed a study about this question. Their findings conclude that this statement is not true. One can lead a horse to water and make it drink. The study group found that it takes 3 texans.
Two to hold the horse's head under water, while the other sucks on its ass.
I love it...:thumbsup:Actually, ut has completed a study about this question. Their findings conclude that this statement is not true. One can lead a horse to water and make it drink. The study group found that it takes 3 texans.
Two to hold the horse's head under water, while the other sucks on its ass.
Does Erick's loss of eligability for academic reasons take coin out of Hawkin's pocket?
There is an academic performace clause in the HC contract, right?
I think it opens up a scholly. Not 100% on it. I think they'll switch Faatagi to a financial aid package to finish up but it won't count towards our scholarship limit. Where's 4DB? he knows these things.
Getting a degree would be nice. jmho.
I think it opens up a scholly. Not 100% on it. I think they'll switch Faatagi to a financial aid package to finish up but it won't count towards our scholarship limit. Where's 4DB? he knows these things.
You can earn a degree with less than a 2.0?
4db is nothing more than a messenger. :smile2::thumbsup:
I am understanding that Erick's grades aren't to team standards. But I didn't think he was flunking out.
I am understanding that Erick's grades aren't to team standards. But I didn't think he was flunking out.
Ok.. you'd know better than I would.
:wow:Are you saying the team has higher standards than the school?