As a college football fan I'm tired of watching the SEC receive favorable treatment for not apparent reasonAs a college football fan I would much rather watch Clemson vs. Alabama than Clemson vs. OSU.
As a college football fan I'm tired of watching the SEC receive favorable treatment for not apparent reasonAs a college football fan I would much rather watch Clemson vs. Alabama than Clemson vs. OSU.
How does that justify them getting in?As a college football fan I would much rather watch Clemson vs. Alabama than Clemson vs. OSU.
I'd rather watch Georgia v Clemson/Oklahoma/USC. I really think USC would beat just about everyone ranking 4th or lower.As a college football fan I would much rather watch Clemson vs. Alabama than Clemson vs. OSU.
This is either solid sarcasm or one of the stupidest things I've seen recently. Either way, congratulations.The ONLY reason Fresno State was still ranked by the committee late in the season was because they were pumping up the rankings of all of Alabama's opponents to justify putting them in.
They are better than osu.How does that justify them getting in?
So wait, you're upset that conference champs aren't in, but you don't want more 2-loss teams. Which is worse? Because I'm sure you are aware that the two P5 champs that didn't make it both have 2 losses.First everyone complained that the Big XII got screwed because they didn't have a championship game. Now a team that wins it's championship game doesn't make it...again. Oh, and by the way, expanding the playoffs will only make things worse as more and more teams with 2 losses make it in. Before you know it, it will be the NFL with teams going 8-4/7-5 making it and going on a tear at the end of the season and wining the NC. F!
There is a very clear logic to their choice. They followed the charter. It’s not perfect. For those that don’t like these choice, advocate to change the charter, don’t shoot the Committee.As a college football fan I'm tired of watching the SEC receive favorable treatment for not apparent reason
I'm saying i hate the playoffs (earlier post). I don't want 2 loss teams in. But if we're going with this arbitrary bull****, they aren't doing it well. I want teams to play their balls off every year. Then the best 2 play - period. And I want Alabama sitting there going "wait, we were good all year. we only lost our last game to our biggest rival. that's not fair." **** you Alabama.So wait, you're upset that conference champs aren't in, but you don't want more 2-loss teams. Which is worse? Because I'm sure you are aware that the two P5 champs that didn't make it both have 2 losses.
SOR and FPI remain the best predictors of “best” after four cycles of CFP, not conference championships. They chose the four best, as their charter dictates.They are better than osu.
Nine conf gameSomebody needs to force the SEC to adopt a 9 conference game schedule.
You have absolutely no way to prove that.They are better than osu.
Either can you. Committee agrees with meYou have absolutely no way to prove that.
Opponent | Margin | FPI | Sagarin | Opponent | Margin | FPI | Sagarin |
Utah St. | 49 | 85 | 84 | n-Florida St. | 17 | 20 | 30 |
FAU | 17 | 61 | 57 | Fresno St. | 31 | 60 | 56 |
@BYU | 34 | 96 | 113 | Colorado St. | 18 | 72 | 77 |
N'western | 9 | 26 | 19 | @Vanderbilt | 59 | 77 | 83 |
@Nebraska | 21 | 74 | 74 | Ole Miss | 63 | 55 | 59 |
Purdue | 12 | 50 | 35 | @Texas A&M | 8 | 44 | 45 |
Maryland | 25 | 84 | 80 | Arkansas | 32 | 70 | 75 |
@Illinois | 14 | 107 | 126 | Tennessee | 38 | 75 | 92 |
@Indiana | 28 | 49 | 52 | LSU | 14 | 17 | 18 |
Iowa | 24 | 24 | 22 | @Mississippi St | 7 | 19 | 20 |
Michigan | 14 | 23 | 21 | Mercer | 56 | UR | 149 |
@Minnesota | 31 | 66 | 61 | @Auburn | -12 | 6 | 8 |
n-Ohio State | -6 | 2 | 4 |
Wisconsin | Alabama | ||||||
Opponent | Margin | FPI | Sagarin | Opponent | Margin | FPI | Sagarin |
n-Ohio State | -6 | 2 | 4 | @Auburn | -12 | 6 | 8 |
Michigan | 14 | 23 | 21 | LSU | 14 | 17 | 18 |
Iowa | 24 | 24 | 22 | @Mississippi St | 7 | 19 | 20 |
N'western | 9 | 26 | 19 | n-Florida St. | 17 | 20 | 30 |
@Indiana | 28 | 49 | 52 | @Texas A&M | 8 | 44 | 45 |
Purdue | 12 | 50 | 35 | Ole Miss | 63 | 55 | 59 |
FAU | 17 | 61 | 57 | Fresno St. | 31 | 60 | 56 |
@Minnesota | 31 | 66 | 61 | Arkansas | 32 | 70 | 75 |
@Nebraska | 21 | 74 | 74 | Colorado St. | 18 | 72 | 77 |
Maryland | 25 | 84 | 80 | Tennessee | 38 | 75 | 92 |
Utah St. | 49 | 85 | 84 | @Vanderbilt | 59 | 77 | 83 |
@BYU | 34 | 96 | 113 | Mercer | 56 | UR | 149 |
@Illinois | 14 | 107 | 126 |
How does that justify them getting in?
OSU got worked twice. Alabama lost only once, on the road, in the most heated rivalry in sports. I have a hard time believing OSU advocates wouldn't argue for OSU over Bama if Bama got killed by OU at home, got killed at Mizzou/Kentucky, and OSU's only loss was to a top ten Michigan team on the road.
Schedules are made years in advance. CSU is usually a pretty decent G5 and FSU is almost always a top ten team. Pretty difficult to penalize Bama because FSU didn't turn out to be as good as it usually is.
New plan Larry Scott, beat SEC at it's own game.
6 Conference games. No championship game. Play a bunch of scrubs.
Anyone who says the committee rewards "aggressive" scheduling hasn't been paying attention.
If USC had scheduled Mercer instead of ND, they'd be in. If the Big10 didn't have a conference championship game, Wisconsin would be in. I could see arguments between Ohio State and USC, but Bama did nothing to deserve to be there. Who did they beat? When your best win is against a team that lost at home to Troy, you don't get in the playoffs.
Like in BBall, it shouldn't be about who you lost to, it should be about who you beat.
1. Bama beat #17 team at home and #23 team on the road. Trash.
2. OSU beat #6 Neutral site, #9 home and #16 home. Conference champ
3. USC beat #13 home and neutral, and played 12 P5 teams in 13 weeks. Conference champ
You make key points. But wins are only part of the evaluation. The Committee looks at the while body of work, using advanced metrics correlated to “best”, their charter. You can’t cherrypick.New plan Larry Scott, beat SEC at it's own game.
6 Conference games. No championship game. Play a bunch of scrubs.
Anyone who says the committee rewards "aggressive" scheduling hasn't been paying attention.
If USC had scheduled Mercer instead of ND, they'd be in. If the Big10 didn't have a conference championship game, Wisconsin would be in. I could see arguments between Ohio State and USC, but Bama did nothing to deserve to be there. Who did they beat? When your best win is against a team that lost at home to Troy, you don't get in the playoffs.
Like in BBall, it shouldn't be about who you lost to, it should be about who you beat.
1. Bama beat #17 team at home and #23 team on the road. Trash.
2. OSU beat #6 Neutral site, #9 home and #16 home. Conference champ
3. USC beat #13 home and neutral, and played 12 P5 teams in 13 weeks. Conference champ
Who a team lost to should, and does matter.New plan Larry Scott, beat SEC at it's own game.
6 Conference games. No championship game. Play a bunch of scrubs.
Anyone who says the committee rewards "aggressive" scheduling hasn't been paying attention.
If USC had scheduled Mercer instead of ND, they'd be in. If the Big10 didn't have a conference championship game, Wisconsin would be in. I could see arguments between Ohio State and USC, but Bama did nothing to deserve to be there. Who did they beat? When your best win is against a team that lost at home to Troy, you don't get in the playoffs.
Like in BBall, it shouldn't be about who you lost to, it should be about who you beat.
1. Bama beat #17 team at home and #23 team on the road. Trash.
2. OSU beat #6 Neutral site, #9 home and #16 home. Conference champ
3. USC beat #13 home and neutral, and played 12 P5 teams in 13 weeks. Conference champ
It was proven. FPI and SOR.If Alabama wants to be considered one of the top four teams they should have to prove it. Playing Fresno, Colorado State, and Mercer instead of real teams, and travelling for none of those takes away any credibility they have.
They played 3 what would be called quality teams in Auburn, LSU, and Miss State, and lost one of those. They did try to have a quality win but Florida State was bad but still their schedule is inexcusable.
And no we don't need to go to six or eight teams. We are having trouble finding four teams that we can argue were the best in college football this year and people want to add another 2-4 teams to the mix. No. One of the special things about college football is that the regular season matters. I don't want some 3 loss team getting hot/lucky at the end and winning the title.
Yesterday was the first round of the playoffs with the conference championships, those games should be the priority in getting into the playoff.
Not an SEC fan. Just telling the truth. I don’t care who is in as long as the charter is followed.SEC fanboi all hot and bothered today.
Not an SEC fan. Just telling the truth. I don’t care who is in as long as the charter is followed.
Bama was ahead of tOSU in every poll.
Why change this week?