Sexton Hardcastle
Club Member
This has nothing to do with the 90's
:smile2:
This has nothing to do with the 90's
:nod:You are starting with the assumption that price is the deciding factor in getting fannies in the seats. It has been shown time and time again that it is winning.
ESPN has a detailed by school breakdown
http://b2.caspio.com/dp.asp?AppKey=900c1000ea466e223e104a22814a
The University subsidized the CU AD by 5.5m $.
And here´s a list of the Top 10 subsidized ADs
http://thesportseconomist.com/2011/03/15/college-athletic-department-subsidies/
Does anyone know how we've done over the past decade with not just paying off the expansion, but putting butts in the suites?
Good news. I was thinking things were a lot worse. Thanks abs.recently the numbers have been good despite dan's sucking, we've been over 90% the past three seasons on the suites and I believe sold them out last year. Prior to that i have no idea/info.
Why are we thinking about expansion?
Damnit. I totally forgot about the 90's.the 90's?
If the Sooners can't even sell out, what makes anyone think CU can? :lol:
Damnit. I totally forgot about the 90's.
I also heard the counting crows are the best band ever and will be replacing the band for most football games.
Apparently this thread has turned into one of those ads for Bing.
Look up OU's attendance in the 90's when their football program was equivelant to what CU is now. I bet CU's % is way better.
This has nothing to do with the 90's
valdez thought it was about the 90's so I thought I would talk about the 90's
valdez thought it was about the 90's so I thought I would talk about the 90's
Dark beer? Bleh.90 schilling is an American beer done in the scotch brown ale style.
Dark beer? Bleh.
Part of what makes UT such a money earner is the fact that they have a 100,000+ seat stadium. That's twice the size of Folsom, and they probably charge more per seat than CU does, and make more off of concessions, parking, etc.
When CU is in a position to expand Folsom, it really needs to do so. A 53,000 seat stadium won't cut it, long term. We'll need it to be 80,000+ in order to really compete with the rest of the college football elites.
Damnit. If one more person feels the need to chime in with "We don't sell out now, we shouldn't even be thinking about expansion". I'm gonna go berzerk. We're NOT talking about expansion now. The point is that places like UT make so much money partly because they have 100,000+ seat stadiums that they fill. We need to be at a point where we can fill an 80,000 seat stadium in order to compete at that level. This has nothing to do with any kind of discussion about stadium expansion right now. Don't read things that aren't there.
Ticket sales and stadium revenue is a small portion of the pie. The big reason why Texas makes all that money, is because there alumns donate a lot of money to the program, and they have a major tv deal with the Big 12, that is why Nebraska left the Big 12 because they were tired of the deal texas is getting in terms of revenuse. That is why you hear people call the new conference the texas 10. The make matters worse, Texas is going to earn even more money after signing a deal with ESPN. It is unfair, the competitive advantage texas is getting. Texas also invested in alot of sports. What we need to do as a program, is to get better in Basketball, track and field, and invest in more sports teams, maybe add Baseball and Softball.