Buffs find a bit of a running game and keep Carr on the sideline to an extent. We win 42-38 in a nail biter.
Early season poling is a great indication of how good a team is...
CU's stats are actually better, and that comes against much stiffer opposition. So the "big numbers" argument isn't very good.Lots of kool aid drinking this week. I am praying they pull this out. And I am 100% confident it will be light years better than out performance last year. BUT I think this is gonna be a tough one for our boys. First of all their offense is putting up some big numbers and Carr is a stellar QB. Their receivers are all very fast a very big, could pose issues against our undersized nickle and dime backs. Our D will do better than last year but even with good planning I still think they are gonna put up 40+ points. Gonna be tough for us to keep up. The only way I see us getting close to winning is if they somehow discover a running game this week to keep the ball outta Carr's hands and control time of possession. But considering our running game was PATHETIC against CSU and UCA (who btw have significantly worse talent up front than FS) I am not hopeful that happens. It should be an entertaining one but sadly my prediction: FS- 45 CU-30
What crack are you smoking?CU's stats are actually better, and that comes against much stiffer opposition. So the "big numbers" argument isn't very good.
I get what you're saying about big WRs, but we don't have any smurf DBs anymore. Awuzie and Moseley are both near 6'.
Maybe so, but I like the other kind better. Buffs 39, Fresno 35.45-27 Fresno. Yes, there are moral victories.
I said "stiff". Not "better". Rutgers didn't roll into Fresno with a one game season on their mind, in-state rivalry, hugeass chip on their shoulder (and crazy time zone issues...that game was played pretty late on the west coast). Yeah, Rutgers beats CSU head to head...but CSU v CUWhat crack are you smoking?
Rutgers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CSU
CAU > Cal Poly
Yes, their backups are not world beaters. I'm hoping Coach Mac goes crazy uptempo and grinds their starters into oblivion with the altitude forcing them to roll in backups frequently.Apparently FS put in their backups in the second half, but looking at the game stats from this game and rutgers, I agree.
uhhhh, sure. I guess you can make this argument. It sucks, but you can do it. Also, there is a joke in there somewhere.I said "stiff". Not "better". Rutgers didn't roll into Fresno with a one game season on their mind, in-state rivalry, hugeass chip on their shoulder (and crazy time zone issues...that game was played pretty late on the west coast). Yeah, Rutgers beats CSU head to head...but CSU v CU
Touchéuhhhh, sure. I guess you can make this argument. It sucks, but you can do it. Also, there is a joke in there somewhere.
Yes, their backups are not world beaters. I'm hoping Coach Mac goes crazy uptempo and grinds their starters into oblivion with the altitude forcing them to roll in backups frequently.
Why is that? Their defense will be gassed at altitude and their starters on defense aren't exactly amazing and their backups like stated above aren't world beaters. It could back fire by Fresno being on offense more, but I'll trade points for ten more snaps for Fresno on offense.About the absolute last thing you want to do, is pick up the tempo with Fresno State.
Why is that? Their defense will be gassed at altitude and their starters on defense aren't exactly amazing and their backups like stated above aren't world beaters. It could back fire by Fresno being on offense more, but I'll trade points for ten more snaps for Fresno on offense.