Don't understand why people are surprised that 'tini sets his sights low...
BTW, one reason you need stronger comp is the BCS formula. You do want to play in BCS games and maybe for the MNC, yes?
I don't disagree with ya BuffedUp. I like the formula -- one cupcake, one middlin team from somewhereville, and one BCS level opponent.
Unfortunately, a cupcake and a middlin prolly won't put butts in Folsom seats. Been that way a long time. We're likely to see the same type of scheduling we've seen for quite a while.
Consistent winning coupled with a good marketing effort is what will put fannies in the seats. Relying on the opponent to sell CU games is a culture we need to put behind us. If we have to deal with losing 10k+ sold tickets a year for several years in order to set the stage for long-term health, it's a deal we need to make. Fortunately, unprecedented revenues from the conference kick in beginning with the 2012 season so we can absorb some short-term pain.
Unfortunately, a cupcake and a middlin prolly won't put butts in Folsom seats.
Consistent winning coupled with a good marketing effort is what will put fannies in the seats. Relying on the opponent to sell CU games is a culture we need to put behind us. If we have to deal with losing 10k+ sold tickets a year for several years in order to set the stage for long-term health, it's a deal we need to make.
Consistent winning coupled with a good marketing effort is what will put fannies in the seats. Relying on the opponent to sell CU games is a culture we need to put behind us. If we have to deal with losing 10k+ sold tickets a year for several years in order to set the stage for long-term health, it's a deal we need to make. Fortunately, unprecedented revenues from the conference kick in beginning with the 2012 season so we can absorb some short-term pain.
Agree 100%. Particularly the part in bold. There are a lot of schools that we could get in here that would be just fine and would probably get us a solid win. Utah State, Weber, Idaho, NMSU, UNM, UNC, Wyoming. These are the schools we need to be in contact with to ensure we're getting 6 true home games in odd years.
The South does have some dank BBQ but I still don't think we need to schedule the LSU's yet.
**** you. I'm not the only one that said we didn't need to have these tough ass schedules just so that we could put asses in the seats but funny that you would only quote my post and not the others.We get it. ****ing man up and stop being such a whiney pussy.
**** you. I'm not the only one that said we didn't need to have these tough ass schedules just so that we could put asses in the seats but funny that you would only quote my post and not the others.
It's not just about butts in seats...it's about football entertainment value. For someone like yourself who has not missed a home game since 1997, certainly you could be able to appreciate the excitement of a big game.
While W's are important, so is keeping the fans happy.
I for one would be disappointed if CU opted to cheat it's fans from having the opportunity to play on some of the more exciting campuses around the nation.
The A/B/C OOC format works fine. No one is saying schedule A/A/A.
There's nothing wrong with picking which A level teams CU should play based upon entertainment value.
Plus I expect CU to be competitive no matter where they play. That's why those coaches make the big bucks.
Yeah, but the other half of that salary is in scenery.Except for the fact that CU's last two coaches have been paid like C-level coaches. Embree is getting a whopping $750,000 a year to coach the Buffs. That salary puts him at 11th in the Pac-12, I believe - only Washington State's head coach is paid less. (Not sure what Stanford is paying Shaw)
Yeah, but the other half of that salary is in scenery.
It's not just about butts in seats...it's about football entertainment value. For someone like yourself who has not missed a home game since 1997, certainly you could be able to appreciate the excitement of a big game.
While W's are important, so is keeping the fans happy.
I for one would be disappointed if CU opted to cheat it's fans from having the opportunity to play on some of the more exciting campuses around the nation.
The A/B/C OOC format works fine. No one is saying schedule A/A/A.
There's nothing wrong with picking which A level teams CU should play based upon entertainment value.
Plus I expect CU to be competitive no matter where they play. That's why those coaches make the big bucks.
Did you consider Georgia or West Virginia to be the A game?
Oh I was under the impression that your A games were games against LSU/OSU/FSU/Bama/UF etc. The UGA and WVU games were a lot of fun at home.Yes.
LOL. I hope that isn't the sales pitch Bohn uses.
don't laugh, that's how CU sells it's faculty salaries. sure, you may not be getting paid what you might get at a peer institution....and the cost of living is high....but, hey!, look at all THIS!
Oh I was under the impression that your A games were games against LSU/OSU/FSU/Bama/UF etc. The UGA and WVU games were a lot of fun at home.
ehh. only way I'm getting excited if its 1,1,1.
Again, the A games I'd like to see over the next twenty years are:
Army
Virginia
Iowa
Ole Miss
Tennessee
South Carolina
Notre Dame
Penn State
Alabama
LSU.
I've attempted to sequence them in such a way to allow CU to get it's act together, with the easier games earlier and the harder games later.
Each team was selected because of the famed game-day experience. Recruitment was not a factor. I've avoided schools CU has played in recent years during regular season. I've had enough of the B12, so leave them off.
I've heard CU is most like Berkeley, Austin, UVA, and Madison in terms of the college vibe. CU can check off 3 of those 4. Gotta get to Virginia.
I've heard lots of good stories about tailgating at LSU, Ole Miss and Bama. Tennessee and S.Carolina sound fun, too.
Notre Dame, Penn State and Army are just hollowed grounds, kind of like playing between the Hedges in Athens and playing at the 'Shoe.
I'd expect CU to be competitive in all those places and I'd sure rather suffer a loss in any of those places over somewhere like Toledo or Fresno.
Speaking of Army - we talk about having a beautiful campus in Boulder, but in all honesty, Army has us beat by a mile. West Point is breathtaking. The whole campus sits on the side of a hill that overlooks the Hudson River. I can't imagine what it's like in the Winter, but in the Fall, there's probably no more picturesque spot in the country. There's no "town" to speak of, though. There's a small business district that occupies about a half mile of road leading into the academy.
I'd totally go to West Point for a football game.
don't laugh, that's how CU sells it's faculty salaries. sure, you may not be getting paid what you might get at a peer institution....and the cost of living is high....but, hey!, look at all THIS!
In terms of SEC, Knoxville and Columbia are obviously great atmospheres, but Bama, Ole Miss and LSU have far superior campuses. Bama's Bryant Denny literally towers over the campus, as does LSU's Death Valley. With South Carolina, tailgating is great on the SC fairgrounds, but Williams-Brice is a good mile or two off campus. Of course, the Buffs could actually win at South Carolina, Ole Miss (or Tenn in current form). All so hypothetical, but it's mid-July, ain't got nothing else to talk about..