Also synonymous with "Walrus".Is "serious" the same as "not funny"?
Also synonymous with "Walrus".Is "serious" the same as "not funny"?
That is so Walrus.Also synonymous with "Walrus".
What happens to these threads? I want to like AllBuffs, and am impressed with the recruiting sub-site, but every time I take a look here the threads disintregate to the chatter of 14-year-olds. I've heard from a number of other posters who would love to ignore the arguments over on NetBuffs, the hype on BuffScoop, the sunshine dwellers on Rivals, and the empty room echoes on Scout; but AllBuffs, after a good start to a thread, seems to unravel into the domain of a giggling bunch of schoolboys.
The stock market is up today, I made some great trades to recover completely from yesterday, I have three meetings this afternoon, but I also have a deep interest in CU's scheduling (especially after some healthy donations), and then I read this, whatever you call it. This stuff pushes the serious posters out.
Is "serious" the same as "not funny"?
I had some things I thought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.Bah - your mother was a hampster and your father smelled of elderberries. I fart in your general direction.
Not when you keep focusing on the off topic conversation you started. Please stick to the thread topic.I had some things I tought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.
I had some things I tought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.
I had some things I thought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.
You are obviously very important. We are sorry for wasting your time. And by the way, you can always threadjack a thread back to its ORIGINAL topic. That requires some very serious posting though.I had some things I thought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.
Ah now we are getting somewhere. I would love to hear about all of the above. Usually these threads turn into jokes because we have run out of **** to talk about. however it is always refreshing to get some new information. By all means speak up
2 home games for us 1 away game in Foxboro. Bohn wants to connect to our east pipelines.
I did see that. Good Scoop. Post #18. Much love but what have you done for me lately?
Besides Tini's mom smack and ****ing with BP? Nothing.
fixed for troof.I am pretty sure allbuffs is just a collection of posters who regularly get banned from all other sports fan sites.
I had some things I thought would be interesting for AllBuffs to hear about; a couple of conversations I had with Mike about scheduling east coast, Chicago-area, and Texas teams, and getting out of the 2-for1 deal with Fresno State, which doesn't help us in recruiting. It's not worth the time trying to fit it in with stuff like this post.
I thought Pabuff was Matt Thompson.
I like the direction in which this thread is headed.
Hey mateys, I wonder if any of you will want to see CU deliver some pay back to the Big 12 on the gridiron down the road?
Hey mateys, I wonder if any of you will want to see CU deliver some pay back to the Big 12 on the gridiron down the road?
Get prepared for people say this is bad logic.I still say CU should do everything it can to make sure they have 7 home games each year; 6 games in Boulder.
During this rebuilding stage it should be something like this:
CSU
1 non-conf BCS school that is mid-tier in their conf (Syracuse, Rutgers, UConn, Indiana, Vanderbilt, Duke)
1 non conf non-BCS school (Wyoming, AFA, Utah State, Idaho, San Diego State)
1 Div I-AA (Northern Colorado)
Where 3-1 is worst-case-scenario and 4-0 is possible.
Gotta get bowl eliglible to get those extra practices in December; as well as program exposure on a national level. There is no glory in playing the toughest schedule in football, although I understand the dollars and cents behind the decision to play tO$U this Fall. Hopefully, we'll be beyond the days of needing a cash cow by going to the likes of tO$U.
Hayden Fry incorporated this recipe at Iowa when he came back in 1979. We still follow it to this day, eventhough the alumni base wants us to play on the big stage week in and week out. Iowa is mandated by Iowa Legislation to play Iowa State, then we play Pitt (BCS), LA-Monroe (non-BCS D1) and Tennessee Tech (D-1AA).
You take your lumps in Oct/Nov; not September. And you always play in late December or January. Those extra practices are vital.
Get prepared for people say this is bad logic.
Hey mateys, I wonder if any of you will want to see CU deliver some pay back to the Big 12 on the gridiron down the road?
This. I said this all offseason, now maybe people will listen. It's not doing us any good to schedule murders row every year.If we're not going to schedule MAC, Sun-Belt or 1AA teams, then we need to schedule teams like Duke, Vanderbilt and Wake Forest. This "anyone anywhere" thing is laughable given the state of our program, and it's killing us. Recruits might like "big games", but they also like teams that go better than 3-9, and they like teams that play in bowl games. This isn't the 80's anymore where there is a limited number of bowl games, all across the country crappy teams are loading their OOC with winnable games, going .500 or below in conference, and making bowl games year after year. Bowls bring money too, and the extra practice in December is vital. It's absolutely absurd that we continue to do this while Embree is trying to rebuild this program. At least give ourselves a chance, getting to a bowl game in the near future would be ****ing huge. It's suicidal to be having road games at Fresno State as your "easy" game when other teams are playing Stony Brook, and then playing top 10 programs on top of that. It's not the 90's anymore, or even the early 00's...we've got to make vast changes in this department. I don't care if some fans might not like it, fans also don't like to come see teams that win 3 games a year, they like teams that are in the running for bowl games.