Sorry man, you’re wrong. So is Tad. Tons of analysis has been done on this and it’s the wrong move.2 fouls in the first 8 minutes of the game. You sit him in that situation.
Sorry man, you’re wrong. So is Tad. Tons of analysis has been done on this and it’s the wrong move.2 fouls in the first 8 minutes of the game. You sit him in that situation.
Sorry man, you’re wrong. So is Tad. Tons of analysis has been done on this and it’s the wrong move.
TDS is the only pure scorerLast night it was damned if you do damned if you don't, they weren't winning either way. I agree he probably sat him for too long.
I didn't know that. I was used to that old school approach and always think of how uncompromising Cheney was at Temple (2 fouls in 1H, you sit until 2H with no exceptions). Of course, he was kind of over the top in other ways. Like, he wouldn't put any rebounders on the blocks for offensive FTs. His thought was protecting against a secondary break off a miss was more valuable than the occasional OReb.Sorry man, you’re wrong. So is Tad. Tons of analysis has been done on this and it’s the wrong move.
I do think some of it also ties in to Tad's defensive philosophies. When you're a team who wins by Ding up and rebounding, you're going to get more fouls. So I get his point, but I still think in a lot of cases you need to trust your guys. Especially a year like this one where our depth is, um, "questionable" and it's one of your better players who is known as a smart heady guy. It'd be easier if we were one of those pansy ass zone teams that don't know how to play real basketball, but because we're not it becomes something Tad needs to balance. I just disagree with how he does it.I didn't know that. I was used to that old school approach and always think of how uncompromising Cheney was at Temple (2 fouls in 1H, you sit until 2H with no exceptions). Of course, he was kind of over the top in other ways. Like, he wouldn't put any rebounders on the blocks for offensive FTs. His thought was protecting against a secondary break off a miss was more valuable than the occasional OReb.
We've played certain guys w/2 at times this year, and TDS has been one of them. A few min here or there w/in final media TO of the 1st half. I was expecting similar for TDS last night -- push to close the halftime gap to 5 or so. Surprised when it didn't happen.I do think some of it also ties in to Tad's defensive philosophies. When you're a team who wins by Ding up and rebounding, you're going to get more fouls. So I get his point, but I still think in a lot of cases you need to trust your guys. Especially a year like this one where our depth is, um, "questionable" and it's one of your better players who is known as a smart heady guy. It'd be easier if we were one of those pansy ass zone teams that don't know how to play real basketball, but because we're not it becomes something Tad needs to balance. I just disagree with how he does it.
Interesting note, we're 303rd in the nation in 2 foul participation. No real correlation that I saw in a quick scan between teams that let them play and success and teams that don't.
There are? Who are they?This just isn't true, man. There a bunch...a bunch of 6'10" guys all over the country who can play ball. No one is asking for a star,l just a guy who isn't a stuff and can get off the floor.
Then maybe we should stop recruiting 2/3 wing players. Ever year.We’re not getting the bugs that would make a difference. Those guys are going to top 5 teams and are one and done. Therefore we need to go for talent. Guards are overlooked. Win with guards.
You’re talking about a problem that exists against 2-3 teams in our conference. I don’t want to recruit stiffs just so we can throw them out against Arizona and UCLA.Then maybe we should stop recruiting 2/3 wing players. Ever year.
And our new guard heavy lineup will still get murdered by any team with 2 bigs. We already can't keep from getting a 6-2 pg guarding a 7-0 C when we have 1 big on the court. How's that gonna work with none?
Don't recruit Colorado HS players. Problem solved.You’re talking about a problem that exists against 2-3 teams in our conference. I don’t want to recruit stiffs just so we can throw them out against Arizona and UCLA.
And those 7 foot centers have to guard a 6-2 guy on the other end.
Talent > Size
Don't recruit Colorado HS players. Problem solved.
You need to watch some ball...I watched 3 yesterday that didn't trip over their feet, rebounded and could actually shoot a FT.There are? Who are they?
...the best tandem we've had Scott/Gordon and we competed, Scott would go out and Wesley would fill the middle and he was more athletic.You’re talking about a problem that exists against 2-3 teams in our conference. I don’t want to recruit stiffs just so we can throw them out against Arizona and UCLA.
And those 7 foot centers have to guard a 6-2 guy on the other end.
Talent > Size
And I'm betting none of those three were 5*, one and done talents.You need to watch some ball...I watched 3 yesterday that didn't trip over their feet, rebounded and could actually shoot a FT.
LL was overrated out of HS...accept it...the truth sucks it is what it is.
6' 10" and up and can jump higher than 3 pieces of paper that are part of the offense. Every time the Buffs come down the floor on offense it's 4 on 5.And I'm betting none of those three were 5*, one and done talents.
Some guts here act like there aren't a lot of 6'9" or 6'10" guys who are plus athletes out there. There are. A lot of them are at smaller programs too because they aren't particularly skilled.
I watch plenty of ball. Give me names. 6’10 dudes who can ball don’t grown on trees. There are 4 guys in the top 30 in scoring in the pac-12 taller than 6’8. 2 of them play for Cal, the worst team in the conference. 1 of them plays for Wazzu and had his worst game of the season against Colorado. The 4th is Ballo.You need to watch some ball...I watched 3 yesterday that didn't trip over their feet, rebounded and could actually shoot a FT.
LL was overrated out of HS...accept it...the truth sucks it is what it is.
Are we going by raw ppg? 'Cause, Tubelis and TDS would be on the over 6'8 list, as well. Also Drew Peterson, as he has 14" of neck. Dante @ Ore. Not sure who the Cal guys are as... that team has no points.I watch plenty of ball. Give me names. 6’10 dudes who can ball don’t grown on trees. There are 4 guys in the top 30 in scoring in the pac-12 taller than 6’8. 2 of them play for Cal, the worst team in the conference. 1 of them plays for Wazzu and had his worst game of the season against Colorado. The 4th is Ballo.
Edit: I missed Branden Carlson from Utah. So there are 5.
My counting skills suck. Just completely skipped over Tubelis, who is leading the conference in scoring and the Cal guys are in the top 40, not top 30. Top 30 all average over 10 ppg, you get to 31 and you are under 10. And I used the above 6’8 cutoff because I thought that’s what TDS was listed at, but you’re right, he is listed at 6’9.Are we going by raw ppg? 'Cause, Tubelis and TDS would be on the over 6'8 list, as well. Also Drew Peterson, as he has 14" of neck. Dante @ Ore. Not sure who the Cal guys are as... that team has no points.
So I see 7? Arizona has 2 (they always have two), Carlson is pretty dope, TDS isn't a *power* power forward, Peterson is a point guard, Gueye stinks, and Dante is... OK?.
So, there are only 3 true post players in this league who make conference-level significant offensive contributions that I would say I covet.
1000% agree. If I could tweak this roster with immediate effect, addressing the front line is well-down the list.My counting skills suck. Just completely skipped over Tubelis, who is leading the conference in scoring and the Cal guys are in the top 40, not top 30. Top 30 all average over 10 ppg, you get to 31 and you are under 10. And I used the above 6’8 cutoff because I thought that’s what TDS was listed at, but you’re right, he is listed at 6’9.
But the ultimate point is that this CU team’s problems do not stem from a lack of big dudes who can play. Our wings stink and we have one reliable guard.
Funny, I don't see Az, UCLA, Ore, Washington (past few years) struggling to guard our guards when they have 1-2 bigs on the court vs. us going small. How come they don't struggle to guard a 6'2" guy on the other end?You’re talking about a problem that exists against 2-3 teams in our conference. I don’t want to recruit stiffs just so we can throw them out against Arizona and UCLA.
And those 7 foot centers have to guard a 6-2 guy on the other end.
Talent > Size
Nows a great time to remind everyone thanks to CU admissions we dont have a 6’10 true freshman who just played 30 minutes and had 8 points and 12 boards against the 15th ranked team in the nation and is shooting 40% from 3 on the year.Funny, I don't see Az, UCLA, Ore, Washington (past few years) struggling to guard our guards when they have 1-2 bigs on the court vs. us going small. How come they don't struggle to guard a 6'2" guy on the other end?
We don't need 3 7'-1" centers on the court at the same time.
We DO need more than 1 guy who can stop the other team's 7'1" C - Evan did fine at this. Wes wasn't 7" tall, nor a Center.. XJ, FFS Tory Miller in all his AF biting ways could play in the middle.
We don't need any more god damn 6'7" left handed wings who can neither shoot nor stop anyone who weighs more than 210 or is more than 6'8" tall.
Nows a great time to remind everyone thanks to CU admissions we dont have a 6’10 true freshman who just played 30 minutes and had 8 points and 12 boards against the 15th ranked team in the nation and is shooting 40% from 3 on the year.
TDS is a "power forward" like Kevin Durant is a power forward.Are we going by raw ppg? 'Cause, Tubelis and TDS would be on the over 6'8 list, as well. Also Drew Peterson, as he has 14" of neck. Dante @ Ore. Not sure who the Cal guys are as... that team has no points.
So I see 7? Arizona has 2 (they always have two), Carlson is pretty dope, TDS isn't a *power* power forward, Peterson is a point guard, Gueye stinks, and Dante is... OK?.
So, there are only 3 true post players in this league who make conference-level significant offensive contributions that I would say I covet.
Houston's non-big bigs:Also just want to point out Kansas won the natty last year with 1 player above 6’8 in their rotation last year. Arizona with a bigger team last year with Koloko, Ballo and Tubelis lost to a Houston team with one player in their rotation above 6’8. We don’t need height, we need grit, toughness and another shot creator.
We definitely look like one of the skinniest teams in the nation. I watch a lot of college hoops and never see a Power Six team that looks as thin as our Buffs.Houston's non-big bigs:
6-8 230
6-8 230
6-8 225
6-7 230
Kansas' non-big bigs:
6-8 225
6-8 225
6-7 225
CU's non-big bigs:
6-9 217
6-8 213
6-6 215
I left out anyone who either red-shirted or was a walk-on / didn't or doesn't play (QA) - as far as I can tell from mins played, started, etc.
It's not just height - we simply don't have the bodies / mass to match up with these guys. We most assuredly don't have the guard skills to go around them. But boy oh boy, do we have some wings.