Roy has the avs going well. But other than that, I would argue Tad is the best.
I can't listen to the radio anymore right now. I'm a Broncos fan, but all they want to talk about is the Broncos still. The Nugz are waffling, the Rockies are starting Spring Training, the Avs are playing AWESOME, the CU Buffs have lots of storylines as they right the ship headed towards the end of the season..... yet I keep having to hear the same Broncos talk every.single.day.
I can't listen to the radio anymore right now. I'm a Broncos fan, but all they want to talk about is the Broncos still. The Nugz are waffling, the Rockies are starting Spring Training, the Avs are playing AWESOME, the CU Buffs have lots of storylines as they right the ship headed towards the end of the season..... yet I keep having to hear the same Broncos talk every.single.day.
To catch you up, D-Mac was saying how he wants Incognito on the Broncos. I wasn't surprised because obviously he hasn't learned his lesson from his time at KBPI.
That ****ing guy! How does that shriveled, whiny voiced bastard still have a job? How does Big Al stand working with someone who knows so little about sports?
Would love to listen to Al again but I gave up listening to that show until dmac is history. He makes Evans look like mother****ing Dan Patrick in comparison.
Sandy did a nice job of covering the Buffs, our tournament chances and the fUCLA loss. He can be arrogant and long-winded, but he does know his stuff better than most on the Denver radio channels anyway
Skimming the headlines of the DP Sports Section before coming into work would pretty much clear that bar.
Sandy spent 90% of his 45 minutes today (pre-empted for Olympics coverage) gushing about Tad Boyle. Tad's going to be on the Drive tomorrow I think. Was shocking to hear him keep going about the Buffs.
Sandy spent 90% of his 45 minutes today (pre-empted for Olympics coverage) gushing about Tad Boyle. Tad's going to be on the Drive tomorrow I think. Was shocking to hear him keep going about the Buffs.
It's Hour 2 w/ Mike Evans here:can you give me the approximate time this was on? would love to hear a replay.
How can you not talk up these Buffs if you're doing a Colorado sports talk show on the cusp of March Madness?
What about the candy he gives out on Halloween? Hmm pretty sure another qb had that story before lol.Is that a serious question? Because if it is, here's the answer: The NFL combine is next week. The draft soon after. OTAs need to be reported on. And then there's always the issue of what Peyton Manning does in his spare time.
Attendance? It's A) the wins and B) the obvious quality of Tad as a coach. If CU was .500 and packing CEC, we wouldn't be seeing any media coverage.I should add that the biggest reason this stuff is getting reported the way it is is due to the fact that the games are well attended. CU sold out it's season ticket allowance. That got people's attention in a hurry. Dave Krieger talks about that all the time. People like Sandy are giving this attention because they figure that other people are giving it theirs. The logic being that if CU is constantly getting 10K+ into their games (which I think they are), then there must be something going on there that is worthy of reporting.
Attendance? It's A) the wins and B) the obvious quality of Tad as a coach. If CU was .500 and packing CEC, we wouldn't be seeing any media coverage.
Is that a serious question? Because if it is, here's the answer: The NFL combine is next week. The draft soon after. OTAs need to be reported on. And then there's always the issue of what Peyton Manning does in his spare time.
Is that a serious question? Because if it is, here's the answer: The NFL combine is next week. The draft soon after. OTAs need to be reported on. And then there's always the issue of what Peyton Manning does in his spare time.
They've had these wins before. It was obvious Tad was a good coach when he was at UNC. So while I would agree that those are factors, I maintain that the biggest reason is actual attendance. You don't ignore 10,000 people showing up at 9:00 on a Wednesday night to watch a basketball game. The opposite side of your argument is also true - if CU was 20-8 and pulling crowds of 5,000, the media coverage would be far more limited. Not only would it be limited, but it would probably be somewhat critical, as in "What's wrong with CU fans when they can't support a 20-8 team"? That would be the story, not the play of the team itself.
They've had these wins before. It was obvious Tad was a good coach when he was at UNC. So while I would agree that those are factors, I maintain that the biggest reason is actual attendance. You don't ignore 10,000 people showing up at 9:00 on a Wednesday night to watch a basketball game. The opposite side of your argument is also true - if CU was 20-8 and pulling crowds of 5,000, the media coverage would be far more limited. Not only would it be limited, but it would probably be somewhat critical, as in "What's wrong with CU fans when they can't support a 20-8 team"? That would be the story, not the play of the team itself.
Attendance is just one measure. College basketball and particularly the Buffs are shown to a wider audience than the Mammoth and lax. Plus the fact there's message boards like this, there's a clear interest. How many people on Twitter are talking about the Mammoth?Not sure I agree with this. The Colorado Mammoth average over 15,000 a game, and I don't recall hearing them mentioned once - ever - on local sports talk radio.