I don't have to be a plumber to know my faucet is leaking. 14-26 is a leaky faucet...enough said.
Don't like Hawkins and I have had enough. But, from a cup half full perspective...we are now above .500.--not good, but finding the positive stats usually takes some digging. without going in to great detail about our rankings amongst our big 12 counterparts...basically we are near last in every category after this weekend.
Don't like Hawkins and I have had enough. But, from a cup half full perspective...we are now above .500.--not good, but finding the positive stats usually takes some digging. without going in to great detail about our rankings amongst our big 12 counterparts...basically we are near last in every category after this weekend.
That's not above .500, man. Not even close. We need to go on a 12-game winning streak just to reach .500.
That's not above .500, man. Not even close. We need to go on a 12-game winning streak just to reach .500.
wow, I am retarded...sounds like i need to be on the coaching staff.
I find that Hawkins really makes it difficult for me to like...Hawkins.
I don't like "tude...and he has it big time. He reminds me on Kanye West...all mouth.
Don't like Hawkins and I have had enough. But, from a cup half full perspective...we are now above .500.--not good, but finding the positive stats usually takes some digging. without going in to great detail about our rankings amongst our big 12 counterparts...basically we are near last in every category after this weekend.
hey great effort though sd, can you play wide out
wow, I am retarded...sounds like i need to be on the coaching staff.
So, for the next 10 1/2 days, are we going to be subjected to nothing but complaining about and berating Dan Hawkins? :huh:
So, for the next 10 1/2 days, are we going to be subjected to nothing but complaining about and berating Dan Hawkins? :huh:
So, for the next 10 1/2 days, are we going to be subjected to nothing but complaining about and berating Dan Hawkins? :huh:
So, for the next 10 1/2 days, are we going to be subjected to nothing but complaining about and berating Dan Hawkins? :huh:
Piling on ^^^this^^^. I find it incredibly offensive to get lectured on coming back from adversity when it comes from a guy who has been paid $1 million a year to fail (going on his 4th year). Most people make less than 1/10 what Hawkins does and if their job performance was even close to his they'd be unemployed. Hell, in this economy a lot of people who performed better than him are unemployed from their low-paying jobs. **** him and his arrogance. He's a public employee and he acts like he's above criticism from those of us that are paying his salary and investing a lot of ourselves to support the CU program.
opcorn:
Great thread guys, everyone has pretty much covered what I would have said. Only thing I would add is
You are 14-26 Hawk, STFU and win some damn games. You don't have a lifetime appointment as Head Coach at CU.
And to DBT, the only way Hawk turns the fanbase around is WINNING Big.. And that means like a conference title, etc. Until then, you will continue to have more people against Hawk than for him. He lost any patience from the fanbase based on his team performance in the first two games of the year.. A few wins here and there will not make people forget that.. That's just reality.
Even a recovery to a 6-6 season will not change the minds of the majority of the fanbase. .
Barnett recovered in a similar situation after 2001 with the loss to Fresno State. We'll see if Hawk can repeat that in the near future instead of whining like he's doing here to the media.
opcorn:
Great thread guys, everyone has pretty much covered what I would have said. Only thing I would add is
You are 14-26 Hawk, STFU and win some damn games. You don't have a lifetime appointment as Head Coach at CU.
And to DBT, the only way Hawk turns the fanbase around is WINNING Big.. And that means like a conference title, etc. Until then, you will continue to have more people against Hawk than for him. He lost any patience from the fanbase based on his team performance in the first two games of the year.. A few wins here and there will not make people forget that.. That's just reality.
Even a recovery to a 6-6 season will not change the minds of the majority of the fanbase. .
Barnett recovered in a similar situation after 2001 with the loss to Fresno State. We'll see if Hawk can repeat that in the near future instead of whining like he's doing here to the media.
:nod:10 1/2 days? You are an optimist! Its a safe bet this will continue until the SOB is gone!
Barney didn't go 0-2 before hand either. He and his team didnt look like a dear in the headlights the entire game. We were driving and we were running a strong offense. Ochs got picked in the end zone while we were trying to score. The kid who picked him was a senior and remember the play from film and knew exactly where to go. Game came down to one play. Big, big difference between then and now imho.
opcorn:
Barnett recovered in a similar situation after 2001 with the loss to Fresno State. We'll see if Hawk can repeat that in the near future instead of whining like he's doing here to the media.
That Fresno team was very good. They were ranked like 8th in the country for a while. I doubt CSU and Toledo are going to reach the top 30, let alone the top 10. This comparison bugs about as much as the Mac 0-4 start.
That Fresno team was very good. They were ranked like 8th in the country for a while. I doubt CSU and Toledo are going to reach the top 30, let alone the top 10. This comparison bugs about as much as the Mac 0-4 start.
And how has Hawk done at CU in comparsion to Barnett, Neushiel, McCartney, and even Crowder? Wasn't Hawk saying that he was up to the challenge? He clearly hasn't met that challenge and that is why the fans & media are giving him a hard time. CU's standards are that CU competes for league championships and Hawk's CU teams are nowhere close to doing that.
I agree that a 6-6 record would hardly show any progress for the Buffs if the Buffs manage to finish with a record like that.
Sub 500 seasons in Red
McCartney:
1982 Colorado 2-8-1 1-5-1 T-6th
1983 Colorado 4-7 2-5 T-6th
1984 Colorado 1-10 1-6 7th
1985 Colorado 7-5 4-3 3rd L Freedom Bowl
1986 Colorado 6-6 6-1 2nd L Bluebonnet Bowl
1987 Colorado 7-4 4-3 4th
1988 Colorado 8-4 4-3 4th L Freedom Bowl
Neuheisal:
1995 Colorado 10–2 5–2 T-2nd W Cotton
1996 Colorado 10–2 7–1 2nd W Holiday 8 8
1997 Colorado 5–6* 3–5* T-4th — —
1998 Colorado 8–4 4–4 4th W Aloha — —
Barnett:
1999 Colorado 7-5 5-3 3rd (North Division W, 62-28 Insight.com Bowl
2000 Colorado 3-8 3-5 4th (North Division)
2001 Colorado 10-3 7-1 1st L, 38-16 Fiesta Bowl † 9 9
2002 Colorado 9-5 7-1 1st (North Division) L, 31-28 (OT) Alamo Bowl 21 20
2003 Colorado 5-7 3-5 T-4th (North Division)
2004 Colorado 8-5 4-4 1st (North Division) W, 33-28 EV1.net Houston Bowl
2005 Colorado 7-5 5-3 1st (North Division) L, 19-10 Champs Sports Bowl
Hawkins:
2006 Colorado 2–10 2–6
2007 Colorado 6–7 4–4 L Independence
2008 Colorado 5–7 2–6
2009 Colorado 1-2 0-0
With Mac he replaced Fairbanks who went 7-26 in 3 seasons and left Bill an empty cupboard. I just wonder how bad it really was at the end of Barnetts tenure. Hawkins, through 3 seasons, was 13-24 by way of comparison.
What happened to 1989 and 1990? You left that out.... We all know about 1990, here is 1989 from Wiki:
When the final regular season poll for 1989 was released, the Colorado Buffaloes had taken only seven years to go from 110th to number one in the country. They played in the Orange Bowl against Notre Dame on January 1, 1990. They lost to Notre Dame, 21–6, and ended the year number four in the nation.
The 2001 Fresno team great. They beat CU, Oregon St (SI pre-season #1) and Wisconsin to start the year.
At least when CU lost that game they were in the game. INT in the end zone to end the game trying for a win.